crippler9
Club Legend
- Jun 9, 2020
- 1,141
- 1,518
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I’d rather pick a man instead of kidsHayden Young Lachlan Ash
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’d rather pick a man instead of kidsHayden Young Lachlan Ash
Oh you poor poor soul, imagine not starting Harmes lol. Can't believe I have to go through it again. Averaged 95 in 2019 playing midfield/hff, was moved to the backline for no apparent reason apart from Goodwin being an idiot as usual. Is confirmed to be back in that role, has been playing there in match sim and playing like his 18/19 self again. Viney, Brayshaw, Oliver all still playing round 1 but have all had their injuries and could be slightly underdone. Harmes is only 25 as well so scope for improvement too. At worst he averages 80-85 and makes a bit of cash as a stepping stone, at best he's 95-100 and a useful D6. I expect an average anywhere in the 90's. Massive POD too.Wheres all this love coming from for Harmes?
Only one score of 100 plus last year ( 103 )
Next two highest scores are 95 and 77.
I also can't see Harmes averaging 90+ but everyone is more than welcome to have him in their teams.Cant see any of those guys averaging 90 plus imo.
Oh you poor poor soul, imagine not starting Harmes lol. Can't believe I have to go through it again. Averaged 95 in 2019 playing midfield/hff, was moved to the backline for no apparent reason apart from Goodwin being an idiot as usual. Is confirmed to be back in that role, has been playing there in match sim and playing like his 18/19 self again. Viney, Brayshaw, Oliver all still playing round 1 but have all had their injuries and could be slightly underdone. Harmes is only 25 as well so scope for improvement too. At worst he averages 80-85 and makes a bit of cash as a stepping stone, at best he's 95-100 and a useful D6. I expect an average anywhere in the 90's. Massive POD too.
I think it all just depends on where you prioritise the cash use very hard to predict which mid price is going to kill it SuperCoach wiseI also can't see Harmes averaging 90+ but everyone is more than welcome to have him in their teams.
Absolutely, mid pricers are always the hardest to pick, probably why I'm against a lot of them hahaI think it all just depends on where you prioritise the cash use very hard to predict which mid price is going to kill it SuperCoach wise
I also can't see Harmes averaging 90+ but everyone is more than welcome to have him in their teams.
Young, Ash, Cumming, Markov, I think have just as much chance to average 90 as Harmes. Sure he has done it before but with two pigs with him in the midfield in Petracca & Oliver, I can't see him scoring enough to justify just picking even a 100k rookie over him and using the extra cash to upgrade elsewhere.
Massive pod but everyone has him?Oh you poor poor soul, imagine not starting Harmes lol. Can't believe I have to go through it again. Averaged 95 in 2019 playing midfield/hff, was moved to the backline for no apparent reason apart from Goodwin being an idiot as usual. Is confirmed to be back in that role, has been playing there in match sim and playing like his 18/19 self again. Viney, Brayshaw, Oliver all still playing round 1 but have all had their injuries and could be slightly underdone. Harmes is only 25 as well so scope for improvement too. At worst he averages 80-85 and makes a bit of cash as a stepping stone, at best he's 95-100 and a useful D6. I expect an average anywhere in the 90's. Massive POD too.
3% ownership. Bit of a BF special.Massive pod but everyone has him?
Been plenty of them in years gone by.3% ownership. Bit of a BF special.
No current season stats available
I think it all just depends on where you prioritise the cash use very hard to predict which mid price is going to kill it SuperCoach wise
I'll do the same with Harmes, that's my point.I'd just about put my house on Cumming and Markov not averaging anywhere ****ing near 90 ppg.
Unlike those guys Harmes has actually done it beforeI'll do the same with Harmes, that's my point.
Unlike those guys (except Markov), he's spent 6 years in the system and he costs 344k.Unlike those guys Harmes has actually done it before
That's fine but you clearly didn't watch him in 2019. He only scored below 80 twice all season. Obviously role plays a big part for Harmes, but at 344k if he can consistently score above 80 and average 95 then I'm sold. I think most Harmes owners are hoping his ownership stays low though, so you do you and enjoy Markov!Unlike those guys (except Markov), he's spent 6 years in the system and he costs 344k.
Markov is at a new club where he's more than likely brought in to play consistently so added him in.
The others are youngsters who are very possibly about to burst and are cheaper to some extent.
Just think in general across all positions there are better mid priced options than Harmes so save your money and spend it elsewhere as I don't think Harmes will go close to a 95+ average this year.
Good luck to those that pick him though.
Unlike those guys (except Markov), he's spent 6 years in the system and he costs 344k.
Markov is at a new club where he's more than likely brought in to play consistently so added him in.
The others are youngsters who are very possibly about to burst and are cheaper to some extent.
Just think in general across all positions there are better mid priced options than Harmes so save your money and spend it elsewhere as I don't think Harmes will go close to a 95+ average this year.
Good luck to those that pick him though.
Could have been, he's one of many players I think could potentially be a better choice than Harmes in way of money management &/or points scoring.How do you know Markov wasn't bought in to play a lockdown role?
I don't have Markov, he was used as an example, but you do you and enjoy Harmes. I'd rather use my money elsewhere.That's fine but you clearly didn't watch him in 2019. He only scored below 80 twice all season. Obviously role plays a big part for Harmes, but at 344k if he can consistently score above 80 and average 95 then I'm sold. I think most Harmes owners are hoping his ownership stays low though, so you do you and enjoy Markov!
Could have been, he's one of many players I think could potentially be a better choice than Harmes in way of money management &/or points scoring.
Just think the love for Harmes is strange imo.
Like I said though good luck to the guys that are going with him.
I'm probably not picking Harmes either but to write off him averaging 90+ as if it's not even a possibility is a bit silly.