List Mgmt. 2021 List Management: Draft, Trade, Free Agency and Academy
- Thread starter Lach72
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Pick 8 and a future second for pick 18 and Neale
Please don't recommend this... they already cant decide if he should be a defender and wanted him in the midfield.. if they have him up forward as an option we may aswell as have pinch hitting ruck.
id snap Brisbane's hand off if that was offered.
dont forget we have plenty of Cap space coming up with Mundy fyfe walters heading towards the end of their contracts/careers
Taylor
Community Leader
- Moderator
- #15,656
What's your thoughts on this?
Will Ashcroft is projected top five next season and Brisbane will expect to have a first round pick of their own at let's say #14, if they had our pick to go along with that then they have the points to potentially buy a pick inside the bid for Ashcroft and get let's say #4 and #6 in that draft.
Right now, Collingwood would wish they had their pick #2 and another first, because they'd swap pick #1 for it and get the top two players in the draft.
Our pick could allow them to match a bid for Ashcroft without it chewing up their own first round pick too, which makes it's value even higher.
Yeah but that’s like saying I’d rather have a warm beer over a cold ham and cheese toastie and they forgot the ham.
I agree with you. The lions supporters don't..they want nothing to do with a future 1st.
- Jun 6, 2010
- 4,030
- 12,851
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Dillon Panthers
Listening to Trade Radio. . I swear Peter Bell must’ve had sex with Stephen Silvagni’s wife.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Jun 30, 2011
- 6,211
- 12,202
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Why get angry? Just reflect in satisfaction on the fact that someone with apparently the knowledge and insight of a troll on the BigFooty Drafts and Trading Board was Carlton's List Manager for several years
All the stupid trades he did? Not 4D chess as it turns out; he's just an idiot.
- Sep 27, 2018
- 2,313
- 4,622
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- brisbane lions
Terry Wallace was so much better at this gig.
Have a shot everytime SOS says " I've got no idea"
- Jun 6, 2010
- 4,030
- 12,851
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Dillon Panthers
And Brad Lloyd hates them both. Lloyd gets along with Bell/Walls so I expect a fair trade between both clubs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Honestly surprised Lloyd survived the carlton purge.
showemhowtorock
Cancelled
- Jun 18, 2019
- 1,389
- 3,974
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
all the talk about Freo being desperate to get Callahan and now this is interesting
- Jun 30, 2011
- 6,211
- 12,202
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
How the hell are the Cats supposed to trade up the order to 2? Does anyone read his stuff before it gets published?
The only clubs in a position to trade for 2 would Richmond and us. Realistically just us I'd have thought unless they want future firsts or swags of second rounders.
#VICBIAS
Pick 1 if you want 100%.
But most don’t have him in top 10 calculations. I’d have thought he’d be available at their pick 13 but the gap from 2-13 would be a nail biter if that’s literally their main target.
Interesting if Finn is our main target. He won’t be there at 6 (8). So we could attempt 6 and 8 for 2 and 13.
Problem is we potentially miss out on what i’d think is our main tall target in Amiss. But at 13 there would still be plenty of options.
He's a jerk plain and simple
Pussinbootz
Headless Chook
- Oct 17, 2016
- 466
- 843
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Doesn’t Ashcroft need to nominate Brisbane before they get access to him? Pretty sure he’s a Vic Metro kid. Would be pretty funny if he didn’t after all this talk of them not wanting future picks. I saw heaps of people carrying on about it during the Neale saga a few weeks back
- Jun 30, 2011
- 6,211
- 12,202
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
A trade for 2 is at least feasible for us under certain scenarios. For instance if GWS rated (ignoring the Father Sons and Horne Francis) Callahan, Hobbs or Ward (Or Erasmus too for that matter) as only slightly better prospects that a group containing Gibcus, Andrew and Rachele they might feel that given where there list is at (Midfield rotations full of young A grade mids) it maximises list quality to target talls and flankers. Then they could justify trading down to our 6 and 8 knowing they'll get two of the ones they want. This is all predicated on them rating those players as only slightly inferior prospects. If Callahan is clearly the 4th best prospect they should take him.
2, 13 <> 6, 8, 27
Normally the premium for trading up would be more than this, but if it's a mutual deal.
The other horrible idea that crossed my mind:
2, Coniglio <> 6, 8
2, 13 <> 6, 8, 27
Normally the premium for trading up would be more than this, but if it's a mutual deal.
The other horrible idea that crossed my mind:
2, Coniglio <> 6, 8
you're right - it's horrible
- Thread starter
- #15,675
2 and 13 and Coniglio for 6 and 8 and a future 2nd
They get Mac Andrew and Coniglios ridiculous contract off their hands we get Coniglio, Callaghan and JVR/Amiss/Rachele
They get Mac Andrew and Coniglios ridiculous contract off their hands we get Coniglio, Callaghan and JVR/Amiss/Rachele
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
