Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2022 AFL Draft Discussion

what do we do?

  • trade back in with a future first and take phillipou

  • trade back in with a future second and take barnett

  • trade back in with a future second for someone else

  • only take MM and keep the other spot for PSD/rookie


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Our draft haul:

Pick 17 - Max Michalanney (matched F/S)
Pick 43 - Billy Dowling
Pick 50 - Hugh Bond

Rookie Pick 5 - Andrew McPherson (re-listed)
Rookie Pick 21 - Paul Seedsman (re-listed)
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad


AFL 2022: Spectre of a Tasmanian team has rivals on red alert to avoid compromised drafts chaos​

Clubs do not want to be stuck trying to rebuild when the likely new Tasmanian team is introduced, but the AFL has an idea to combat fears about a draft wipe-out, writes Jay Clark.

A new Tasmanian team would be forced to trade out a significant portion of its top draft picks for mature players in a bid to speed-up the 19th team’s on-field rise.
The league has begun briefing clubs on the proposed list concessions for a new Tasmanian team which aims to avoid the mistakes made in the Gold Coast and GWS Giants’ setup.

In particular, the league wants a new Tasmanian team to be more competitive in its first few seasons and, at the same time, minimise the impact of the draft concessions on rival clubs.

It means the 19th club would still receive a swathe of top draft picks but the league will make the club trade them for stars and ready-to-go role players rather than stockpile early selections for elite underage talents.

It will ensure rival clubs will still have access to the traded-out first-round draft picks in contrast to the 2010-2012 period when the Suns and Giants dominated the drafts.

Nine of the first 13 players at the 2010 draft went to Gold Coast and 11 of the first 14 players in the 2011 draft went to GWS, as well as the top-two players the following year.

It heavily restricted teams’ access to top-end talent for a three-year period, but the league is determined to avoid the same scenario when Tasmania is likely brought in from 2027.

A decision is expected to be made by the AFL in the next few weeks with strong support expected from all but two or three clubs.

The spectre of a Tasmanian team was a factor in this year’s trade period as Geelong and Hawthorn made moves to access young talent before the compromised drafts likely begin from 2025.
Jones please
 

AFL 2022: Spectre of a Tasmanian team has rivals on red alert to avoid compromised drafts chaos​

Clubs do not want to be stuck trying to rebuild when the likely new Tasmanian team is introduced, but the AFL has an idea to combat fears about a draft wipe-out, writes Jay Clark.

A new Tasmanian team would be forced to trade out a significant portion of its top draft picks for mature players in a bid to speed-up the 19th team’s on-field rise.
The league has begun briefing clubs on the proposed list concessions for a new Tasmanian team which aims to avoid the mistakes made in the Gold Coast and GWS Giants’ setup.

In particular, the league wants a new Tasmanian team to be more competitive in its first few seasons and, at the same time, minimise the impact of the draft concessions on rival clubs.

It means the 19th club would still receive a swathe of top draft picks but the league will make the club trade them for stars and ready-to-go role players rather than stockpile early selections for elite underage talents.

It will ensure rival clubs will still have access to the traded-out first-round draft picks in contrast to the 2010-2012 period when the Suns and Giants dominated the drafts.

Nine of the first 13 players at the 2010 draft went to Gold Coast and 11 of the first 14 players in the 2011 draft went to GWS, as well as the top-two players the following year.

It heavily restricted teams’ access to top-end talent for a three-year period, but the league is determined to avoid the same scenario when Tasmania is likely brought in from 2027.

A decision is expected to be made by the AFL in the next few weeks with strong support expected from all but two or three clubs.

The spectre of a Tasmanian team was a factor in this year’s trade period as Geelong and Hawthorn made moves to access young talent before the compromised drafts likely begin from 2025.
Hey Gil, if you don't want to compromise future drafts SEND NORTH MELBOURNE FFS!!!

They're starting the rebuild now, will be up and firing by then.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Currently have him at 3 in my rankings
Must admit I am a bit confused and disappointed now , I was certain everything was lining up for us to use 5 on Matteus and absolutely could have secured Rankine with next years first + some if necessary.
Surely it’s not possible he may have been considered a fraction too young with his early draft d.o.b as a potential big body mid for the rebuild and we will look to a Hollands type or pre /free agent for that, but I’m lost now having thought it a no brainer.
 


So with the likely introduction of a Tasmanian 19th AFL side in 2027, we have 4 more 'uncompromised' drafts. If we have been drafting with an eye to 2024 as a finals tilt, we will still have time to top up on high end youngsters and it may be that when the team comes in, we are going to potentially be one of the least affected teams as we would have built from the ground up and our youth will all be entering mid 20's only by then

It would suck to have to go into rebuild mode a year or 2 before that side likely comes in
 

SA's top 5 at the National Draft Combine.​

2km Time Trial​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (MINUTES)
Jakob RyanGlenelg6:16
Billy DowlingNorth6:21
Mattaes PhillipouEagles6:25
Max MichalanneyNorwood6:30
Harry BarnettWest6:32

20m Sprint​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (SECONDS)
Mattaes PhillipouEagles2.993
Jakob RyanGlenelg3.01
Isaac KeelerNorth3.019
Max MichalanneyNorwood3.028
Will VerrallSouth3.046
Will-Verrall-2022-Draft-Combine-Jonathan-DiMaggio-AFL-Photos.png

South Adelaide’s Will Verrall showing off his speed in the 20m Sprint. Picture – Jonathan DiMaggio (AFL Photos)

Agility Test​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (SECONDS)
Max MichalanneyNorwood8.362
Billy DowlingNorth8.413
Mattaes PhillipouEagles8.478
Jakob RyanGlenelg8.566
Adam D'AloiaEagles8.717

Standing Vertical Jump​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Will VerrallSouth67
Jaiden MagorSouth66
Max MichalanneyNorwood64
Harry BarnettWest62
Billy DowlingNorth61


Running Vertical Jump - Right​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Mattaes PhillipouEagles83
Max MichalanneyNorwood76
Will VerrallSouth73
Billy DowlingNorth72
Jaiden MagorSouth69

Running Vertical Jump - Left​



PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Will VerrallSouth90
Mattaes PhillipouEagles87
Billy DowlingNorth75
Jakob RyanGlenelg75
Harry BarnettWest75

 

2km Time Trial​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (MINUTES)
Jakob RyanGlenelg6:16
Billy DowlingNorth6:21
Mattaes PhillipouEagles6:25
Max MichalanneyNorwood6:30
Harry BarnettWest6:32

20m Sprint​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (SECONDS)
Mattaes PhillipouEagles2.993
Jakob RyanGlenelg3.01
Isaac KeelerNorth3.019
Max MichalanneyNorwood3.028
Will VerrallSouth3.046
Will-Verrall-2022-Draft-Combine-Jonathan-DiMaggio-AFL-Photos.png

South Adelaide’s Will Verrall showing off his speed in the 20m Sprint. Picture – Jonathan DiMaggio (AFL Photos)

Agility Test​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (SECONDS)
Max MichalanneyNorwood8.362
Billy DowlingNorth8.413
Mattaes PhillipouEagles8.478
Jakob RyanGlenelg8.566
Adam D'AloiaEagles8.717

Standing Vertical Jump​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Will VerrallSouth67
Jaiden MagorSouth66
Max MichalanneyNorwood64
Harry BarnettWest62
Billy DowlingNorth61


Running Vertical Jump - Right​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Mattaes PhillipouEagles83
Max MichalanneyNorwood76
Will VerrallSouth73
Billy DowlingNorth72
Jaiden MagorSouth69

Running Vertical Jump - Left​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Will VerrallSouth90
Mattaes PhillipouEagles87
Billy DowlingNorth75
Jakob RyanGlenelg75
Harry BarnettWest75

So Phillipou is skilful, clever, determined, big AND athletic and fast...

Sounds pretty good
 
SA's top 5 at the SA STATE Combine

Impressive display by South Adelaide's 198cm Tall Defender/Ruck.

2km Time Trial​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (MINUTES)
Lachlan ScannellGlenelg5:49
Frank SzekelyNorth6:22
Kyle MarshallSouth6:27
Archie LovelockGlenelg6:33
Tom EmmettSturt6:33

20m Sprint​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (SECONDS)
Rhett MontgomerieCentral3.013
Kyle MarshallSouth3.016
Oscar KregarWest3.039
Darcy MinchellaWest3.054
Shaun BennierNorth3.09


Agility Test​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBTIME (SECONDS)
Tom EmmettSturt8.161
Shaun BennierNorth8.179
Jake WalkerGlenelg8.21
Rhett MontgomerieCentral8.213
Kobe RyanWest8.317

Standing Vertical Jump​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Oscar KregarWest71
Kyle MarshallSouth68
Kobe RyanWest64
Frank SzekelyNorth64
Lachlan ScannellGlenelg63

Running Vertical Jump - Right Hand​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Kyle MarshallSouth85
Kobe RyanWest81
Lachlan ScannellGlenelg79
Darcy MinchellaWest76
Oscar SteeneWest73

Running Vertical Jump - Left Hand​

PLAYERSANFL CLUBHEIGHT (CM)
Kyle MarshallSouth89
Oscar SteeneWest83
Oscar KregarWest83
Lachlan ScannellGlenelg82
Kobe RyanWest79
 
Last edited:
Must admit I am a bit confused and disappointed now , I was certain everything was lining up for us to use 5 on Matteus and absolutely could have secured Rankine with next years first + some if necessary.
Surely it’s not possible he may have been considered a fraction too young with his early draft d.o.b as a potential big body mid for the rebuild and we will look to a Hollands type or pre /free agent for that, but I’m lost now having thought it a no brainer.
Wasn't certain we would have got him at what will be pick 6. 2023 is meant to be a much stronger deeper draft anyway. A lot of clubs seem to be valueing 2023 picks higher than 2022 picks.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Must admit I am a bit confused and disappointed now , I was certain everything was lining up for us to use 5 on Matteus and absolutely could have secured Rankine with next years first + some if necessary.
Surely it’s not possible he may have been considered a fraction too young with his early draft d.o.b as a potential big body mid for the rebuild and we will look to a Hollands type or pre /free agent for that, but I’m lost now having thought it a no brainer.
Didn't an ITK poster say that Adelaide had spoken to Phillipou and there were some red flags?
 
Wasn't certain we would have got him at what will be pick 6. 2023 is meant to be a much stronger deeper draft anyway. A lot of clubs seem to be valueing 2023 picks higher than 2022 picks.
Sure, have read about next years draft and who knows what pick we may have and could be a great player available to us. Guess what I was floating is after a total rebuild at what point is it getting too late to go to the draft for your No 1 elite
mid ( arguably your most important player )and you really need to trade one in.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

As I’ve said a few times , put him in the bottom age list of this year and he sits in the top 3

So given he’s only eligible by 6 days why not get him as he’s available now rather than wait for a pick in next years 1st round

Edit • top 3 outside Harley Reid
 
As I’ve said a few times , put him in the bottom age list of this year and he sits in the top 3

So given he’s only eligible by 6 days why not get him as he’s available now rather than wait for a pick in next years 1st round
Question is, what would we have to give up

Say he’s available at the Dogs’ pick - would you do 11 + their F2 for 23 + our F1? IMO that might be what it’d take
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2022 AFL Draft Discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top