List Mgmt. 2022 AFL Draft & Rookie Draft

[Aphrodite]

 

[The Return of the Paf]

If you're praising what is historically worst recruiting team in the AFL, while bagging out us, maybe you should possibly reconsider your opinions.

Just a thought.

Why should I give a figg what their draft history is like, don't know, don't care. It would be disingenuous for that to influence my opinion on what they managed in the last two nights. They killed it. At any rate, let's not call the kettle black.

 

[Juice030103]

Take a bow Austin take a ****en bow


2 players I really like in hollands and Cowan


Don’t know much about Binns but from what I’ve seen on Blue abroad and on here seems like a good get


And then the project player in Lemmey. Very good drafting.

Now for number 17

 

[Beyond Blue]

We don't have a list spot

Well that’s problematic then, unless there is an unforeseen retirement/delisting.

 

[Stamos]

Well that’s problematic then, unless there is an unforeseen retirement/delisting.

That would be very unforeseen.

 

[Benaly28]

Couldn’t give a rats toss bag what any other team did,very happy with our choices,some may consider them ‘vanilla’ a bit like Sam Walsh

18

Sam Walsh

Age

25

Ht

184cm

Wt

84kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

25.1

5star

K

13.5

5star

HB

11.6

5star

M

5.1

5star

T

3.2

5star

CL

3.4

5star

No current season stats available

D

26.2

5star

K

15.4

5star

HB

10.8

5star

M

6.0

5star

T

3.2

5star

CL

4.8

5star

………..yeh na.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[TENACIOUS]

Really stoked with our draft...

We got our players we wanted... Our outside & balanced mids and a KPF who was touted as a potential pick #1 at stages last year (slid for reasons) while keeping our future first...

Austin and Co are stars, up there with the best in the business...

 

[Dunna Heartknee]

Binns was the one I wanted with our second pick can seriously play.
Agree with Pommy re Cowan stoked with this selection.
Lemmey could be one of the best tall taken in this draft or be a bust, really happy with this selection.
All in all, a good night for us.

 

[bmaurizio]

Pragmatic draft selections addressed our need for outside run and and a little toughness too, like Lemmy 202cm forward that presents strongly and kicks well, if he develops to potential it will be a massive win.
Well done Nick Austin and team, very happy with the outcome.

 

[Kreuuuzeurns]

So with pick 40 something you wanted a forward that would get the number one defender ahead of Harry and Charlie? No pressure Lemmey

Was more the type of player rather than a comment on talent.

 

[The Dochs in]

We passed on our last pick, and are intending to use it on rookie’ing Ed.

Question. Is he worth it anymore? Would we have been better off going for more youth, another KPP?
We’ve just drafted two endurance beasts, we also traded in acres for the wing. Do we need Ed anymore? Endurance beast was his thing. What will he offer next year for us?

It’s sad but true. I love Ed but fear this makes sense. A developing ruck would pose the “smarter” option you’d suspect. I also tend to think TDK might not be a Carlton player in 12 months so 12 months development might be crucial in a 200cm kid

 

[gandaal]

Why should I give a figg what their draft history is like, don't know, don't care. It would be disingenuous for that to influence my opinion on what they managed in the last two nights. They killed it. At any rate, let's not call the kettle black.

Here's an alternative point of view:
-They selected with pick 10 a player that was projected to go 10-15, because he's a massive flog and very inconsistent, but got people excited because noted recruiting geniuses Essendon became interested with pick 4.
-They picked up a tall athlete with mediocre on field performance with pick 31
-They selected a player projected to go 15-30 with pick 35. Not a massive slide in an even draft. A guy who plays a bit forward, a bit in the middle but does neither particularly well.
- They picked a club linked key forward with pick 44. A player whose linked club has a terrible list but still thought he was too shit to take the last spot on their list even though he was totally free at that point.

Who will be right? Only time will tell.

 

[katmanblue]

Lemmey is good enough to play round 1

Big call.


On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[TerryWallet]

TW, Who would you have picked with pick 32?

I probably would have picked Hotton.

 

[The Return of the Paf]

Cowan is our best get at his pick but overall, our strategy baffles me. Playing it ultra safe the one moment then speculating wildly the next. Will Cowan develop into something more important to our structure than a not so quick HPF? If we think we desperately need more run, what makes Binns a better bet than Hotton? Is Lemmey's level of upside really that good because he looks totally disinterested. I would have preferred we split the Binns pick, TBH.

 

[Arr0w]

"Apparently" if we had traded back with the Swans for 14 and 17 (wanted massive overs), we supposedly would have taken Weddle and Allan

 

[chopflop]

Hi Carlton fans.

I had you for our mock draft.

I took
Weddle, Binns and Lemmey for you.
So pretty close. Weddle was a personal favourite so I took him early.

Looks like you have addressed the outside endurance need with your picks.

Best,
Chop

 

[thylacine60]

Hi Carlton fans.

I had you for our mock draft.

I took
Weddle, Binns and Lemmey for you.
So pretty close. Weddle was a personal favourite so I took him early.

Looks like you have addressed the outside endurance need with your picks.

Best,
Chop

fair effort!

 

[gandaal]

"Apparently" if we had traded back with the Swans for 14 and 17 (wanted massive overs), we supposedly would have taken Weddle and Allan

Well considering the crazy deal they got from the Hawks, the Swans were right to ask for massive overs.

 

[Stamos]

"Apparently" if we had traded back with the Swans for 14 and 17 (wanted massive overs), we supposedly would have taken Weddle and Allan

Sounds right, although it would have been 'wanted', rather than 'taken' with Allan, because Pies took him before Swans' second pick.

 

[Arr0w]

Sounds right, although it would have been 'wanted', rather than 'taken' with Allen, because Pies took him before Swans' second pick.

May have switched the picks and got both

 

[ferrisb]

Both Harry's and Charlie, TDK ruck changing with Lemmey

We could get smashed by opposition rucks playing TDK with Lemmey...

 

[Arr0w]

We could get smashed by opposition rucks playing TDK with Lemmey...

Could, but our forward line with both Harry's and Charlie could be unstoppable

 

[marcmurphy3]

For those flipping out don't stress. I have been watching the draft closely for 15 years. There have been heaps of times where I have been disappointed by a selection that turned out great and vice versa. You can't make any definitive conclusions at this stage.

That said, I like our selections.

 

[ferrisb]

View attachment 1564185

Fox footy, one year ago to the day.

Hopefully also describes him one year from now...

 

[tarczonandjane]

For those flipping out don't stress. I have been watching the draft closely for 15 years. There have been heaps of times where I have been disappointed by a selection that turned out great and vice versa. You can't make any definitive conclusions at this stage.

That said, I like our selections.

A good point. People were doing virtual high fives, air kisses, and the whole works in here after the Matthew Watson draft. Full points to anyone who can name the talls we took in that draft (without doing a Google search). We supposedly smashed it.