TENACIOUS
Premiership Player
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2008
- Posts
- 4,679
- Reaction score
- 17,266
- AFL Club
- Carlton
1How many top 30 picks do we have before any player movements?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
1How many top 30 picks do we have before any player movements?
There is also potential for extra picks from players that may be traded out. For example are these around the mark….
TDK will be a first rounder otherwise we won’t trade himThere is also potential for extra picks from players that may be traded out. For example are these around the mark….
Tdk = pick 20-30 (?)
Fisher = pick in 30-40
Jsos = pick >40
Dow = pick 30-40 (?)
If so we don’t have too many pick options <30
Would we consider using our future 1st or 2nd this year?
I agree multiple top picks would be best. Someone like Reid would be great but I'd much rather 3 good kids.If TDK was to go and we got a first rounder for him,
I'd be pissed if we traded 2x firsts, just to move up a few places in the order...
More picks at the top end of the draft the better...
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
A lot of optimism there.I agree multiple top picks would be best. Someone like Reid would be great but I'd much rather 3 good kids.
Our movable assets imo are:
2023 F1, TDK, 2024 F1 and Fisher, Gov, Dow, Hewett/Kennedy.
2023 F1 - 4-8
2024 F1 - 10-15
TDK Trade - 15-20
Fisher Trade - 40-50
Gov Trade - 30-40
Dow Trade - 40-50
Hewett/Kennedy Trade - 20-30
Hope we'd be able to combine all of that to get something like 5, 10, 15, 30. Give or take a few picks either way.
Then we go 1 of 4 ways depending on who's available with our first selection which probably dictates the rest of our choices afterwards.
5 - Colby Mckercher (Balanced Mid)
10 - Darcy Wilson (Outside Mid/Fwd)
15 - Jack Delean (Small Fwd)
30 - Ollie Murphy (KPD)
5 - Nate Caddy (KPF/3rd Tall)
10 - Darcy Wilson (Outside Mid/Fwd)
15 - Will Lorenz (Balanced Mid)
30 - Jack Callinan (Small Fwd/HHF)
5 - Nick Watson (Small Fwd)
10 - Darcy Wilson (Outside Mid/Fwd)
15 - Will Lorenz (Balanced Mid)
30 - Ollie Murphy (KPD)
5 - Zane Duursma (Inside Mid/Fwd)
10 - Darcy Wilson (Outside Mid/Fwd)
15 - Connor O'Sullivan (KPD)
30 - Jack Callinan (Small Fwd/HHF)
I'm still not sure what the best option would be... I'd like us to have a crack at Ben Mckay more than Gresham to allow us to use Young as a backup Ruck/Fwd if TDK was to leave
Won't go through all the different points you've written but I think we're pretty likely to finish bottom 6 as it is, one win against a pathetic Gold Coast side won't change my opinion on that... But if we did have a renaissance I think we should be doing everything we could to trade into the top 5 picks this year given the types of players available around that mark.A lot of optimism there.
Think we will be closer to #8 than #5. Either way it will be fascinating to see how the draft order pans out.
Reid, Walter and increasingly suggested Duursma(I don’t see it, high ceiling but lower floor than I would like at the pointy end) top 3.
In the mix top 5 Curtain, Caddy, Watson, McKercher definitely, with a handful of others who could enter the top 10.
That forward with X factor seems to be our greatest priority. Would be a great outcome of Caddy or Watson reaches us. Different players, but both would serve a purpose. Caddy likened to our Charlie, mobile under sized key/third tall, if Watson was a few centimetres taller would be getting some of the Reid pick one love. Small forward/utility with athleticism, skill and mongrel. I don’t dislike Darcy Wilson, just missing X factor for mine compared to others
Depending on the perception of Young internally, as well as long term intentions for Kempy, Dan Curtain could be very attractive. Defender first, but played both forward and mid at club level this season. KPD and/or high level interceptor with a VERY complete skill set.
I have my doubts any of the three I just named will get to us. If they do, it reverts to “best available” for me.
Doubting we chase a pure mid. Cripps, Walsh, Cerra, Kennedy, Hewett, Doc are logically going nowhere. A resurgent Cuners, Dutchy is likely to develop as much engine room as wing, Binns an option on the outside and some have written Carroll off too early. ( I am forecasting a state league mid acquisition). Williams will be back to add dash too either back or connecting.
Healthier Walsh, Cuningham and better deployed Cez improve the mobility and reckon they may have to decide between Kennedy and Hewett as top team staples in coming years. Not seeing vacancy signs in our midfield. Campo boys likely to add to our mobility the following year. I can also see us redeploying some of our current defenders on wings as the positional squeeze tightens.
If TDK was to leave, there would be some argument to grab 207cm Mitch Edwards to “fix” our long term rucking issues as well. Likewise, if McGovern is not retained we would be prompted to look at Curtain if he lasts or O’Sullivan probably a little later or even Will Patton, more interceptor than KPD enter our high end mix.
Already had Phillipou and Hollands bracketed for our pick at this stage last year, this year remains a mystery.
We see things quite differently. Won’t get in to a tit for tat debate.Won't go through all the different points you've written but I think we're pretty likely to finish bottom 6 as it is, one win against a pathetic Gold Coast side won't change my opinion on that... But if we did have a renaissance I think we should be doing everything we could to trade into the top 5 picks this year given the types of players available around that mark.
A tier ranking right now of the top 20 prospects would be something like:
Tier 1 - H Reid
*
Tier 2 - Walter, Caddy, Watson
*
Tier 3 - Duursma, Mckercher
*
Tier 4 - Curtin, Edwards, Sanders, Rogers
*
Tier 5 - Wilson, Read, Delean, O'Sullivan, Moir
*
Tier 6 - Philactides, Patton, Lorenz, Tholstrup, McCabe, A Reid
The players in that tier 4 will be expected to go between about 6-12 and would all be pretty well useless for us in the short term. All may end up good players for us down the track but someone like Curtin coming in next year would not be something I'd be happy with. Curtin will need a few years to be strong enough to play KPD, Edwards probably need 4-5 just to be able to play in the AFL as a ruck full time. Sanders is a scrappy big bodied inside mid who's biggest flaw is his ball use, which is more of the same for us. Rogers, tied to GCS Academy.
Duursma and Mckercher are the most realistic options for us that would benefit us in year 1. Caddy and Watson are my two favourites in the draft but they are very unlikely to go past pick 3 and 4 after Walter and would take a lot to get up to either. Can't see it happening but who knows what happens draft night.
If its clear they are all unattainable I wouldn't be surprised if we traded down into that tier 5-6 to pick up more players like Wilson, Delean, Moir, Tholstrup, Lorenz etc rather than going for a Curtin or Edwards who I love as prospects... just not for us in the position our list is in right now. By the time they start impacting games consistently and are physically developed, Charlie, H and Weitering etc will be closing in on 30 years old and Cripps, Doc etc will likely be retired.
I just feel like we'll be looking for year 1-2 impact from any players we pick up this year to maximise the primes of Charlie, Weiters etc and try and address any KPP/Ruck holes we have via trade or free agency. Waiting around for Edwards to add 20kgs to his frame and build his tank just doesn't seem like a wise choice even if he may end up a better player than someone like Delean who would provide us spark in the forward half very early on.
Yes it's clear we don't see eye to eye on it all but thats fine, I'll leave it at that. I think Edwards, Curtin, Sanders and others are going to be very good players for someone, just don't think they're fits for us but thats okay.We see things quite differently. Won’t get in to a tit for tat debate.
Curtain will play AFL year 1, he is as much ball player as KPD, think Weitering with “wheels”. (Third tall releasing Kemp up the ground would suit me.) Edwards will be much quicker than you are suggesting, he has forward capability as well, making for easier integration, is the best ruck prospect for many years and could conceivably be incorporated as early as year 1, if drafted to a needy team. Will be “capable” in two to three years. Will absolutely be a slow burn to reach the peak of his powers, but will get plenty of games year 2 latest.
Sanders is a much more bankable prospect than McKercher and is the type to adapt to multiple positions if needed. I am astounded that you are knocking his ball use while elevating McKercher. I may have a little bias as Sanders’ grandfather was a star of “my era” and I have watched plenty from afar, keeps stepping up. If McKercher miraculously gets over his ball butchering, I would be happy to revisit. He absolutely has “the moves”. I am Tasmanian originally and as an old left footer, love seeing the point of difference. I would love to “support” McKercher, but our club needs good users before anything else, and he just ain’t it. He has and will turn heads, but how many clubs tolerate poor kicking from high possession players?
You give Moir a couple of years in the system with a professional trainer and he's going to develop into a monster.
I agree multiple top picks would be best. Someone like Reid would be great but I'd much rather 3 good kids.
Our movable assets imo are:
2023 F1, TDK, 2024 F1 and Fisher, Gov, Dow, Hewett/Kennedy.
2023 F1 - 4-8
2024 F1 - 10-15
TDK Trade - 15-20
Fisher Trade - 40-50
Gov Trade - 30-40
Dow Trade - 40-50
Hewett/Kennedy Trade - 20-30
Hope we'd be able to combine all of that to get something like 5, 10, 15, 30. Give or take a few picks either way.
Then we go 1 of 4 ways depending on who's available with our first selection which probably dictates the rest of our choices afterwards.
5 - Colby Mckercher (Balanced Mid)
10 - Darcy Wilson (Outside Mid/Fwd)
15 - Jack Delean (Small Fwd)
30 - Ollie Murphy (KPD)
5 - Nate Caddy (KPF/3rd Tall)
10 - Darcy Wilson (Outside Mid/Fwd)
15 - Will Lorenz (Balanced Mid)
30 - Jack Callinan (Small Fwd/HHF)
5 - Nick Watson (Small Fwd)
10 - Darcy Wilson (Outside Mid/Fwd)
15 - Will Lorenz (Balanced Mid)
30 - Ollie Murphy (KPD)
5 - Zane Duursma (Inside Mid/Fwd)
10 - Darcy Wilson (Outside Mid/Fwd)
15 - Connor O'Sullivan (KPD)
30 - Jack Callinan (Small Fwd/HHF)
I'm still not sure what the best option would be... I'd like us to have a crack at Ben Mckay more than Gresham to allow us to use Young as a backup Ruck/Fwd if TDK was to leave
If Caddy is gone at our pick, then Id go this young fella for sure.
Edwards big mark and goal. Delean late consolation. Moir back on. Sanchez and O’Driscoll superb forward craft.WA V SA 3/4 time WA getting the better if it.
Tholstrup the star of the show working wing/half forward hybrid role.
Edwards, Curtin, Hardeman, Hall and SA’s Patton maintaining their high status.
WA second ruck Livingstone capable on ball and very dangerous forward with multiple goals.
Sanchez and O’Driscoll showing athleticism, skill and superb pressure as forward options.
Moir injured, Delean unable to get in to goal.
Couple of others draftworthy, but that is most of it.
TDK will be a first rounder otherwise we won’t trade him


Pretty certain like most deals, it has to be mutually beneficial to both parties, as we have seen for a significant period now in the trade period.I don’t know what people mean when they this. TDK is out of contract, we don’t hold much leverage.
Pretty certain like most deals, it has to be mutually beneficial to both parties, as we have seen for a significant period now in the trade period.
Agree no benefit for us to lose TDK for less than a 1st round pick.
Geelong the most likely club have a pick likely 10-14, if they want him they are going to give us their 1st round otherwise we won't let him go eg same as Daniher some years ago to Sydney.No benefit to us and I hope he stays, but if all that’s offered is say pick 25, what then? Lose him for nothing to make a point?
I do t think it will get to that but I don’t see him requesting a trade and then re-signing if we don’t get a good enough pick
Geelong the most likely club have a pick likely 10-14, if they want him they are going to give us their 1st round otherwise we won't let him go eg same as Daniher some years ago to Sydney.
l also hope he stays, hoping we can trade next year's 1st to address some list needs now.
Good user, always has been, but not bursting with speed, which I think the club wants?We see things quite differently. Won’t get in to a tit for tat debate.
Curtain will play AFL year 1, he is as much ball player as KPD, think Weitering with “wheels”. (Third tall releasing Kemp up the ground would suit me.) Edwards will be much quicker than you are suggesting, he has forward capability as well, making for easier integration, is the best ruck prospect for many years and could conceivably be incorporated as early as year 1, if drafted to a needy team. Will be “capable” in two to three years. Will absolutely be a slow burn to reach the peak of his powers, but will get plenty of games year 2 latest.
Sanders is a much more bankable prospect than McKercher and is the type to adapt to multiple positions if needed. I am astounded that you are knocking his ball use while elevating McKercher. I may have a little bias as Sanders’ grandfather was a star of “my era” and I have watched plenty from afar, keeps stepping up. If McKercher miraculously gets over his ball butchering, I would be happy to revisit. He absolutely has “the moves”. I am Tasmanian originally and as an old left footer, love seeing the point of difference. I would love to “support” McKercher, but our club needs good users before anything else, and he just ain’t it. He has and will turn heads, but how many clubs tolerate poor kicking from high possession players?