Remove this Banner Ad

Preview 2024 National Draft Preview Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter giantroo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
If he had of committed we definitely go for talls this year.

Not knowing could leave us a bit thin in the midfield should he leave next year.

A bit disappointing considering he had a few tough years when he first arrived and the club stuck by him.

Sent from my CPH2197 using Tapatalk
If he ****ing what?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Im wondering if Richmond wont give 6 -10/11 for 2 understandably not likely they would prefer to fatten with teen picks......would they give 6 for F1

Then we give Pick 2 & F2 to GWS for 15 & 16 & F1

Losing Pick 2, F1 & F2
Gaining 6-15-16 GWS F1


We lose some capital but get selections right where we want them + GWS F1
Don’t mind it.
Another GWS option if we had a secondary trade agreed with Melb (or Saints). Preferably 15 & 16, more likely 15 & 21.

F1 > GWS 15, 21
(-44 points based on F1 pick 4)

2, 21 > Melb 5 & 9
(-48 points)

5 - Tauru
9 - Armstrong (Shanahan)
15 - Berry (Hannaford)

Would be much simpler if we still had 25 to play with..!
 
Don’t mind it.
Another GWS option if we had a secondary trade agreed with Melb (or Saints). Preferably 15 & 16, more likely 15 & 21.

F1 > GWS 15, 21
(-44 points based on F1 pick 4)

2, 21 > Melb 5 & 9
(-48 points)

5 - Tauru
9 - Armstrong (Shanahan)
15 - Berry (Hannaford)

Would be much simpler if we still had 25 to play with..!
15&16 is horrendous, there isn't an adjective bad enough to describe 15&21. That proposal can FRO.
 
Can anyone think of a recent draftee that has modelled themselves on a North Melbourne player? Our players always are seemingly looked over when it comes to role models..
I recall an interview where Harley Reid compared himself to Lance Picioane.

Of course, there’s no guarantee he’ll reach those heights. Still, a man can dream.
 
Would we be unpopular if we bid on both Ashcroft and Kako before doing our real business with #2 ?
Only to the teams getting the benefits. In reality it’s negligent not to. Lombard as well. I’d be happy to get Ashcroft or Lombard with pick 2 anyway.
 
Only to the teams getting the benefits. In reality it’s negligent not to. Lombard as well. I’d be happy to get Ashcroft or Lombard with pick 2 anyway.
Lombard looks like a quicker, more dynamic Touk Miller going by the highlights. Super prospect.
 
10 wont be part. 6/11. Pick 2 maybe maybe they’ll swindle F3.

Richmond fans are going to melt. Tigers want pick 1&2.
Of course the Tigers want 1 and 2! I’m just surprised at how little half the supporters on here would accept for the pick. 6 and 10 or 11 should be the least we accept. It’s still most likely that we lose that deal in the long run.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1248177

Interesting list Langford at 3 is really high and someone finally not putting him out of that top 5, Sid Draper at 7 is a bit of an iffy and same goes with Leonardo Lombard at 13 way too low.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

How can we make a verbal agreement to trade North our F3 when we gave it to Fremantle in the Bolton trade?
Big clubs are allowed to trade the same pick to several teams- read the fine print
 
How can we make a verbal agreement to trade North our F3 when we gave it to Fremantle in the Bolton trade?

Not to mention we don't need a verbal agreement, our clubs could file that trade today if we've agreed on it.
 
In isolation yes, has to be linked to getting 5 & 9, I’d be stoked to walk away with:
5 - Tauru
9 - Armstrong
15 - Berry
Tauru and or Armstrong are essential gets even if we take one of them at 2. Trade F1 to get a second and third pick further down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom