
mpal6
Norm Smith Medallist
I don't think Allen will get paid as much as you'd think. Definitely not Joe money.
If we pay Allen anywhere close to 800k and a long contract, AFL will do the secret herbs n spices to get Eagles pick 2.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Supercoach Rd 19 Rd19 SC Talk - New badges! - Trade Talk - Carnage! - Capt/VC - BigFooty Cup – Round 3 ,//, AFLW Fantasy 2025! ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 19 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Captains
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I don't think Allen will get paid as much as you'd think. Definitely not Joe money.
That's true but to be fair his next best season was just 28 goals in 21 games.He's kicked 50 goals in a season bro. He is a proven KPF talent at AFL level when fit.
And as a FA Joe would command a lot more than OA.8-900k reportedly.
His 28 goals in 21 games came when Kennedy and Darling were both in the team so he was playing 3rd fiddle. The 20 last year was from 11 games. I don't see any better ready to go key forwards that are gettable for us at this moment.That's true but to be fair his next best season was just 28 goals in 21 games.
His career: 0 (but just 2 games), 20, 18, 28, 53, 20 & 4 this year.
He looked like he was going to be a very good player. One thing, Allen has been accurate 143/77.
Just a matter if he can regain his form.
If the club decide they want him that's great.
If not i am sure they will find the best they can.
I am neither for nor against Allen at this early stage of the season.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
When fit.He's kicked 50 goals in a season bro. He is a proven KPF talent at AFL level when fit.
Not much more than that & he would have been the highest paid player at the club.8-900k reportedly.
Not Joe money for next year and beyond, he was well worth a decent pay rise.I don't think Allen will get paid as much as you'd think. Definitely not Joe money.
When fit.
There's more to it than kicking 50 goals in a season. He's missed a lot of footy through injury. Averages 1.4 goal a game right now. Has some issues that obviously effect his game in a negative way.
I just dont think he's a great fit. Would love to be proven wrong but it just doesnt feel good to me.
Probably not an accurate comment. Being a Priemiership Team, those who have recently re-signed have done so for significantly higher $ than before. It's really a juggling act based on what the club believe's a player is worth. I trust we have the right people to make that call.We are just giving Daniher's money to Allen.
Morris will get his own money.
Not Joe money for next year and beyond, he was well worth a decent pay rise.
Probably not an accurate comment. Being a Priemiership Team, those who have recently re-signed have done so for significantly higher $ than before. It's really a juggling act based on what the club believe's a player is worth. I trust we have the right people to make that call.
Agree with all that you say above. Further to that we currently have:I worry about investing salary cap space into OA, who may or may not be much better than what we already have and can't ruck to boot.
How many years contract do you think he will be after and can we match bids from the like of Hawthorne without tying up too much time and money.
The Devils are about to add a new meaning to wage inflation, and I think we are better off keeping some head room to match possible offers on our young stars.
If Hipwood gets injured, we're incredibly exposed. Sam Day would be leading the forward line in the "big man" stakes. He's playing his role well, crashing packs, bringing ball to ground, but has so far kicked 2 goals.Agree with all that you say above. Further to that we currently have:
a) A team who have won 7 out of 8 thus far.
b) A forward line thats scored more than Collingwood (who are on top of the ladder.)
c) Key Forwards who have rarely been outmarked this year. (so far)
d) The game has changed where key forwards now just need to be competitive & give our small guys the opportunity of picking up the crumbs when the pill hits the ground. Our mozzie fleet up forward are pretty bloody good.
I'm not convinced we need OA or an outside Key Forward. Maybe as the year rolls on it may become the plan but right now as we look at the season thus far, our boys are doing great. OA will not come cheap. Managing what we have now & seeing how they perform this season will be a good indication.
Maybe we mightn't see how much we miss Daniher and how everything is working until later in the year when the teams have sorted themselves out and the best teams begin to emerge.Agree with all that you say above. Further to that we currently have:
a) A team who have won 7 out of 8 thus far.
b) A forward line thats scored more than Collingwood (who are on top of the ladder.)
c) Key Forwards who have rarely been outmarked this year. (so far)
d) The game has changed where key forwards now just need to be competitive & give our small guys the opportunity of picking up the crumbs when the pill hits the ground. Our mozzie fleet up forward are pretty bloody good.
I'm not convinced we need OA or an outside Key Forward. Maybe as the year rolls on it may become the plan but right now as we look at the season thus far, our boys are doing great. OA will not come cheap. Managing what we have now & seeing how they perform this season will be a good indication.
Agree with all that you say above. Further to that we currently have:
a) A team who have won 7 out of 8 thus far.
b) A forward line thats scored more than Collingwood (who are on top of the ladder.)
c) Key Forwards who have rarely been outmarked this year. (so far)
d) The game has changed where key forwards now just need to be competitive & give our small guys the opportunity of picking up the crumbs when the pill hits the ground. Our mozzie fleet up forward are pretty bloody good.
I'm not convinced we need OA or an outside Key Forward. Maybe as the year rolls on it may become the plan but right now as we look at the season thus far, our boys are doing great. OA will not come cheap. Managing what we have now & seeing how they perform this season will be a good indication.
If we can get him back to where he was it's a no brainer.Considering we don't need to give up anything than (increasing) cap space, I think he actually does come cheap, all things considered.
Anyone else "comparable" would come at a relatively similar $$$ figure, but cost us picks or players, with the former being even more valuable now with the re-calibration of the assigned points.
With where our list is at, and hopefully a decent Academy pick every year or so that we need picks and points for, we'd be mad not to make use of the FA market.
There's nothing wrong with looking around, but remember that trying to get anyone decent who is still under contract will involve paying up in draft picks. In this draft we're trying to match a player who looks like a top 10 pick. We can do that with our draft hand, but not if we're trading out high picks for good veterans.Below from wheeloratings.
Just to see if any other player might do the job over Day and Allen
I have started with the ending of what wheeloratings have classed as a pure ruck.
The list is in average hit outs order.
The headings state totals but they are averages except for goals
Day at the top of H/O list but not when you look at other categories.
View attachment 2298265
View attachment 2298264
View attachment 2298261
We'll fix that good and proper. Don't you worry about that!One thing, Allen has been accurate 143/77.
I remember when we signed a free agent forward who had also missed a lot of footy through injury, averaged 1.77 goals a game and had some issues that were obviously affecting his game in a negative way. It worked out pretty well. I'm willing to take a similar gamble again for a reasonable price.When fit.
There's more to it than kicking 50 goals in a season. He's missed a lot of footy through injury. Averages 1.4 goal a game right now. Has some issues that obviously effect his game in a negative way.
Let's ask a question, would we be a better team this year with Joe rather than Day? The answer is obviously yes. Why? Joe brought lots to the table that Day doesn't, most obviously a huge goal threat. If teams didn't cover Joe well, he'd destroy them (when he kicked straight), and if they did cover him well, they'd leave holes elsewhere for others to exploit.Agree with all that you say above. Further to that we currently have:
a) A team who have won 7 out of 8 thus far.
b) A forward line thats scored more than Collingwood (who are on top of the ladder.)
c) Key Forwards who have rarely been outmarked this year. (so far)
d) The game has changed where key forwards now just need to be competitive & give our small guys the opportunity of picking up the crumbs when the pill hits the ground. Our mozzie fleet up forward are pretty bloody good.
I'm not convinced we need OA or an outside Key Forward. Maybe as the year rolls on it may become the plan but right now as we look at the season thus far, our boys are doing great. OA will not come cheap. Managing what we have now & seeing how they perform this season will be a good indication.
I remember when we signed a free agent forward who had also missed a lot of footy through injury, averaged 1.77 goals a game and had some issues that were obviously affecting his game in a negative way. It worked out pretty well. I'm willing to take a similar gamble again for a reasonable price.
Consider as well, if Allen had absolutely no knocks on him and was consistently in great form, we'd be no chance of getting him. His club would have offered him a lot of of money for a lot of years for him to stay, and if he didn't take it, they'd certainly match him and demand a huge price in a trade. It's only key forwards with some concerns who even become available to other teams (unless that team is Geelong I guess).
Let's ask a question, would we be a better team this year with Joe rather than Day? The answer is obviously yes. Why? Joe brought lots to the table that Day doesn't, most obviously a huge goal threat. If teams didn't cover Joe well, he'd destroy them (when he kicked straight), and if they did cover him well, they'd leave holes elsewhere for others to exploit.
I think a big reason we have a better record so far this year is that our smalls have stepped up a gear, like Bailey and Ah Chee, but imagine how many more opportunities they would get if defences were distracted by another big goal threat at CHF.
No current season stats available