This in spades.
Both NSW and Qld are divided into two areas, split between two teams. That's a massive leg up regardless of how you spin it. There's no qualification that a player must be indigenous or from a migrant background, just that they're in one of the academies.
The other thing that never seems to get mentioned is the fact that the northern teams talk about their own investments into their academies, however that investment comes from distributions made to them by the AFL which is primarily generated by a handful of clubs.
The Saints haven't been particularly nuanced in their approach to F/S and academies, however the points they make aren't any less valid, at least with respect to the academies.
This push back is one that really infuriates me whenever I hear it (Cal Twomey the latest in an article the other week) and for a different reason than you've highlighted.
If Victoria was divided up between just Collingwood and Geelong these same people don't think these 2 sides wouldn't be very happy to pour millions into their own academies also? Turn it up.
As it is now I always find it somewhat odd that Oakleigh is part of our NGA region and yet we've seen NGA players representing the Chargers not being tied to us. I can only assume if they come from a regional area originally like JUH that takes precedent over what U18 side they play for. I also assume that if you come from Metropolitan Melbourne what U18 team you can represent is dictated by what zone you live in or am I wrong?
As it is I thought it was pushing the boundaries of what should be allowed when we had a kid playing in the Victorian U18 competition last year and yet was tied to a Northern club. When does the Northern academy end and the elite Victorian pathway begin?
On principle GWS and the Suns probably should be given a little more leeway (in what form I don't know) as they don't have the same access to F/S prospects but that's not that case for the Lions and Swans as evidenced by their current playing lists.










