Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If you're going to come on here and post news about our club, the least you could do is offer Murdoch tabloids paywalls the respect they deserve and post the full article.
Not allowed by admins - against rules. Sorry to give you update when we will actually know what's happening. You're right somebody else (North supporter) did it anyway. It's a public thread but it will not happen again.If you're going to come on here and post news about our club, the least you could do is offer Murdoch tabloids paywalls the respect they deserve and post the full article.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Your admins might respect scumbag right wing media owners but nobody here does. Have at it.Not allowed by admins - against rules. Sorry to give you update when we will actually know what's happening. You're right somebody else (North supporter) did it anyway. It's a public thread but it will not happen again.
Ralph writing that as if he knows something (or wants readers to think he does).It is understood that the latest inquiry is close to being finalised and could result in the AFL stepping in to penalise Thomas this time, after the Roos were forced to act last season.
If the allegations were proven the league would be forced to suspend Thomas given his previous issues and the AFL’s strong stance on respect towards women
This fukcwit is known as the truck ( and hates it). He will make a comment like this then say the complete opposite when the outcome is advised. Classic 50/50 have no idea ,click bait don't care about the individual who he makes this siht up about. Maybe the herald sun should be waiting for the outcome instead of this peanutRalph writing that as if he knows something (or wants readers to think he does).
If he knows something then the AFL have still got a serious leaking issue.
If he knows nothing then Ralph is just a sh!t stirrer, although I suppose 90% of punters are probably making the same sort of guess about outcomes.
I just hope this isn't media trying to engineer an outcome.
writing thisNot allowed by admins - against rules. Sorry to give you update when we will actually know what's happening. You're right somebody else (North supporter) did it anyway. It's a public thread but it will not happen again.

As I said - the rumours I hear are that the suspension will be significant. I am told there has been consideration to deregistering him for a period of time and finalising the actual penalty is what is delaying the announcement. Just saying what I hear. I don't know the actual details of the allegations but the rumblings are they are very serious. I suppose we will know early next week.
Wait and see what the allegations are - I'm not sure what will be made public.Cut him loose mother goose
(if true)
Xander McGuire will have the scoopWait and see what the allegations are - I'm not sure what will be made public.
Can’t be good if he’s getting a lengthy suspension.Wait and see what the allegations are - I'm not sure what will be made public.
Ironic you've reclassified a distinct similarity as a point a difference.Funny isn't it? That America's national day celebrates kicking the English out of America, and India's national day celebrates kicking the English out of India, but Australia's national day celebrates the English arriving in Australia. Funny probably isn't the right word. Sad might be a better way to sum it up.
Agree which imp mean the delay bodes well for TT. If they need more information from complainant, then they clearly dont have enough to warrant a penalty. There are also optics at play that they must not be seen to rushing to a no charge finding.I understand people 'want an answer', but having managed a professional standards unit in a large organisation, I can assure those interested that these things rarely run on time. Causes for delay are long and varied, but include:
a. the investigator asking the complainant for further and better particulars
b. providing the subject of the complaint the opportunity to respond to those further particulars
c. a request(s) from the complainant or the subject of the complaint for extensions of time (the reasons for which might be many and varied, eg, illness)
d. referral of findings to external legal opinion to ensure those findings are properly based, and 'will stand up'
Complexities like these are much more likely to be in play than any ulterior motive of the AFL to spin the process out (and in any event, I can't see what such a motive might be)