Melbourne had the best list according to Champion Data heading into the 2019 season...finished 17th.Champion data also routinely tell which squads are elite and they don't turn out to be. Collingwoods greatest midfield etc etc
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Melbourne had the best list according to Champion Data heading into the 2019 season...finished 17th.Champion data also routinely tell which squads are elite and they don't turn out to be. Collingwoods greatest midfield etc etc
Ah Champion Data. More like desisted after 3 games in 7 years data. Absolute s**tMelbourne had the best list according to Champion Data heading into the 2019 season...finished 17th.
Yes Caddy may work, but I reckon his papers are stamped. Reckon Cumberland will force his way into the side early next year. Not afraid to go for his marks and very good once the ball hits the deck. Reckon he will really surprise, has all the attributes.That's an interesting observation. I think it has some merit but I'd rather, if he's still at the club, throw in the forgotten solider back in there - Caddy. Caddy plays the hybrid tall midfielder role well and would offer is another marking target but wouldn't become an immediate liability when the ball comes to ground and is contested. Additionally, Caddy is a strong body who finds spaces in congestion and makes clever decisions under pressure.
Failing that, a mid sized midfielder such as RCD, Ross or Miller could fill that role along side Jack and Lynch as talls, Castagna, Stack and Aarts/Rioli Jnr acting as smalls.
Yes Caddy may work, but I reckon his papers are stamped. Reckon Cumberland will force his way into the side early next year. Not afraid to go for his marks and very good once the ball hits the deck. Reckon he will really surprise, has all the attributes.
If we're to challenge for a flag in 2022 and 2023:
We need our starting midfield in 2022 to be Nank, RCD, Bolton and Prestia. Second string needs to be CCJ, Dusty, Graham, Baker.
No room in there anymore for Cotch, Shedda, Ross, Lambo, Pickett. Most too old, Ross not good enough.
I really worry for Cotch and Shedda. Might end up fighting for a spot on the half-forward line. Sad way to finish great careers.
I actually think I'd prefer a starting midfield of Nank/Soldo, Prestia, Edwards/Cotch and Bolton/Dusty.
Nank rotating with Soldo (center, forward, bench).
Prestia needs to run out a game for us to really be in contention. He is a two way runner so only needs time on the bench. If he's injured, RCD would take his spot.
Edwards/Cotch are still a class above. Edwards is still the player the coaches trust to win the crucial clearance when we need it. Cotchin, is slowing down but he makes a massive difference as a defensive midfielder. I would have Edwards in the center and have him rotate with Cotch in the forwardline where both can be creative and win the ball at ground level.
Bolton/Dusty are our X-Factor is the middle and forward. If we are flying, Dusty should be spending most of his time forward but last season we needed him in the middle of the ground to fill holes.
That's just my thoughts but I don't think you can write off proven stars too early. Share the load, rest and rotate them but don't put them to pasture yet.
No need to worry about Edwards, he was just banged up this year, has plenty left in himFair call. I'm pretty concerned about Cotch and Edwards going on one year too long, but agree that this would have been our best midfield in 2021 if all players were fully fit.
I think the club has already made the call that we'll head to the draft.You really want your damaging match winners to be in the prime of their careers to have a shot at a flag imo. Say 25-30 ideally. Let's not be like some other highly successful clubs and hold out for too long and not see the signs. Fact is that our big names aren't in their prime. I might just be biased after having a peruse at melbourne and bulldogs lists but i'm starting to think a mini rebuild is the way to go. As in hit the draft hard this year and next (and maybe even the one after) and give the over 30s slightly altered roles where they are more about supporting younger players rather than winning off their own shoulders. A little quickie. Fact is we've had a dream half decade and are in a position to do a fairly quick rebuild.
Tricky thing is that with all the injuries we won't really know whether we are over the hill until well into next season. I wonder what call the club will make.
You can only come up with three reasons Damo? Seriously chief you going to have to raise the bar lolAlright, there's been a lot of negativity around our flatlining season, but here's just 3 simple reasons why I feel we can rebound strongly next year:
1. A fit list. This first one is obvious. We're missing way too many games from our experienced upper end players currently. We can lament how all the youth aren't up to it, but at the moment they're being expected to carry too much of the load, rather than being added into the mix gradually with good support around them. I think we'll miss the 8 from here, which adds an extra month to our of season to get our list healthy and reinvigorated.
2. Injection of talent. We have a strong draft hand, and a lower finish has the silver lining of improving that position. Whether we land a good trade target, or go all in on the draft, we should have some fresh new talent to add to our best 22 for 2022. Add to this some game time into our younger crew across the remainder of this year, and I think the short term pain will definitely be for the long term gain.
3. Soft cap increase. This one gets somewhat overlooked. We hear a bit about how tough clubs are doing with the cuts to soft cap. I think it was a Chris Fagan interview outlining some of the things within the club that you just wouldn't consider. Not enough staff to track GPS numbers at training. Assistant coaches having to play the role of sports scientist. Etc. PLUS we had an extra $100k cut compared to everyone else. That's equivalent to one additional role lost within the club. I believe we let go of a lot of coaching staff and prioritiesed recruiting staff. If this pays off with our draft hand, and we can add significantly to our coaching panel with an increased soft cap for 2022, I think this will have a really significant impact.
So that's just 3 simple reasons. Whether that means top 4 & challenge for flags again, who knows - it's a strong, even competition and premierships are hard to win. But I do think we'll rebound strongly next year with a few things going our way, and should be a competitive, finals winning team once again.
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
Just the "big 3" that sprung to mind at the time!You can only come up with three reasons Damo? Seriously chief you going to have to raise the bar lol
We just need one 25-28 year old gun midfielderFor us to bounce back we need 4 - 5 really good young players. ASAP.
I hope not...just hope he's in the background developing slowly like a diamond in the rough...Could be added pressure on young Sampson to progress faster than he anticipated after Mabs and CCJ's exits
I think the club let CJ and Chol go based on good news about soldos fitness and availability for next year. It'll be interesting to see if we go for Talia and 2 KPPs in the draft.Could be added pressure on young Sampson to progress faster than he anticipated after Mabs and CCJ's exits