TradeDraft
Post-Human
Media won't let this Drop all week.
Just be Bagging Collingwood all Week.
Though club does Deserves it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I bet he’s wishing that now.If only he chose the Tigers.....
I bet he’s wishing that now.
Media won't let this Drop all week.
Just be Bagging Collingwood all Week.
Though club does Deserves it
Media won't let this Drop all week.
Just be Bagging Collingwood all Week.
Though club does Deserves it
I look forward to this game to be over, so the media can drop this narrative and move on.
To me the issue with the Treloar move is that in this area the AFL industry as a whole and the sum of its parts struggles with the concepts of being professional sports business when it comes to player movement. If you look at big team sports competitions around the world players can in contract can be moved on a days notice to club not of their choosing often in another city. There’s no apologies or explanations given.
We made a ruthless and cold blooded decision that we needed to move Adam on. We saw him as expendable in the effort to solve the cap issue and probably rebalance our team. It’s sad but that’s reality. Where we got into trouble is that we didn’t just come out and say that, and I get why. We were trying not to tip our hand (though it was a known in the industry anyway) and let’s face it the industry isn’t really ready for that level of professionalism.
I mean if the Treloars are complaining now about how it was handled can you imagine the complaints if we’d been ruthlessly honest and said we were recalibrating our list and viewed Adam as not an essential part fbthe list and therefore expendable?
I can’t see the club being transparent when the issues with treloar are pretty clear his injury history (continuing at the dogs) and impact v 900k salary. Not his fault, but the club won’t publicly come out and say “he’s not worth 900k” not would I expect them toLook at Baseball where Players can be Traded while they are playing a Game and get Pulled from the Game When/IF they are Traded.
Would Helped IF Club was Honest on why Treloar was Traded instead of making it something worse then it really is. I think everyone knew it was because of Salary Cap Isuses
I can’t see the club being transparent when the issues with treloar are pretty clear his injury history and impact v 900k salary. Not his fault, but the club won’t publicly come out and say “he’s not worth 900k” not would I expect them to
I’m sure it happened internally mate but many conversations behind closed doors aren’t made public for good reason.Then I guess they are in for a Bashing either way.
Ned Guy the List Manager should be the Main Guy that should have had a Go At as he Runs the Salary Cap
I’m sure it happened internally mate but many conversations behind closed doors aren’t made public for good reason.
Media won't let this Drop all week.
Just be Bagging Collingwood all Week.
Though club does Deserves it
And maybe the issue with Beams hasn’t helped. Treloar has a number of years to run on his big contract and he has said he has been suffering mentally. So put it all together and there were probably quite a number of reasons why he was traded. It’s unfortunate how it has played out, and again probably an issue with list management and contracts. But in the end the club is bigger than the individual.I can’t see the club being transparent when the issues with treloar are pretty clear his injury history (continuing at the dogs) and impact v 900k salary. Not his fault, but the club won’t publicly come out and say “he’s not worth 900k” not would I expect them to
Jen it’s Collingwood. There’ll always be another narrative.I look forward to this game to be over, so the media can drop this narrative and move on.
They won't stop it and then they will focus more on Stephenson when we play North and then Phillips when we play Hawks.
Well of course it was the AFL who set the narrative up.I look forward to this game to be over, so the media can drop this narrative and move on.
Might have had one if when we were going into forward 50 he didn’t do one of this bombs on the run almost straight to McGovernWould at least have 1 Flag under his name
It’s funny how some people only count the bad stuff.Might have had one if when we were going into forward 50 he didn’t do one of this bombs on the run almost straight to McGovern
(There was another play not long after this where another Pies favourite possible cost us a flag w a rookie mistake)
I like the way we were honest w Phillips - told him straight up 12 months earlier what our intentions were - pity we couldn’t have snagged a first rounder from CatsI don't think they'll even really mention Phillips. He seemed to leave on reasonably good terms, so the story is hardly juicy whatsoever.
No - I really liked Ads, esp in first couple years. Wish they had told him straight up it was cap issues and he was the one they would choose to cut loose.It’s funny how some people only count the bad stuff.