I reckon the footy public's perception of Anderson was driven by two things: he was the public face of a number of unpopular decisions mostly in the direction of fiddling with the game and making it more of a 'product'; and his face always looks like it's just on the verge of an outright snarl.
I understand that perception, but I've met with him plenty of times over the last eight years in his role, and the reality is that he was very well-suited to that job, very smart, inquisitive and willing to listen to evidence, but also a hard negotiator when needed. To those saying he's not a 'footy person', bullshit: he played regular ammos footy, and understood the flow of the game as well as most assistant coaches do.
If you don't like Anderson, it's mainly because you don't like the way the AFL as a whole is driving the game out of the fan tradition. Not going to argue with that, but it's unfair to pin it on just one of the architects.
I understand that perception, but I've met with him plenty of times over the last eight years in his role, and the reality is that he was very well-suited to that job, very smart, inquisitive and willing to listen to evidence, but also a hard negotiator when needed. To those saying he's not a 'footy person', bullshit: he played regular ammos footy, and understood the flow of the game as well as most assistant coaches do.
If you don't like Anderson, it's mainly because you don't like the way the AFL as a whole is driving the game out of the fan tradition. Not going to argue with that, but it's unfair to pin it on just one of the architects.




