List Mgmt. AFL Senior List Contract Status

[robbieando]

SYDNEY SWANS CONTRACT STATUS (Updated 21-NOV-2025)

The minimum list size for each club will be 37, which can be made up of as little as 36 senior listed players and one rookie.

To reach 44, clubs can carry 36-38 senior listed players, four to six Category A rookies, and two Category B rookies.

Current List make up - 37 Senior Listed players, 5 Category A rookies and 2 Category B rookie.

Contract Expires - 2026:
Taylor Adams
Joel Amartey
Rylie Bice
Noah Chamberlain (Cat B Rookie 1st Year)
Harry Cunningham
Joel Hamling (Cat A Rookie 2nd Year)
Liam Hetherton (Cat B Rookie 1st Year)
James Jordon
Jake Lloyd

44

Jake Lloyd

Age

32

Ht

182cm

Wt

81kg

Pos.

D/M

Career

Season

Last 5

D

23.4

5star

K

14.4

5star

HB

9.0

5star

M

4.3

4star

T

1.9

4star

MG

403.9

5star

D

23.4

5star

K

14.4

5star

HB

9.0

4star

M

4.3

4star

T

1.9

3star

MG

403.9

5star

D

23.2

5star

K

13.4

5star

HB

9.8

5star

M

4.2

4star

T

2.2

4star

MG

357.4

5star

(Cat A Rookie 1st Year)
Justin McInerney
Dane Rampe

24

Dane Rampe

Age

35

Ht

187cm

Wt

89kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

17.0

4star

K

10.6

4star

HB

6.4

4star

M

4.9

5star

T

2.5

4star

MG

358.8

5star

D

14.1

3star

K

9.0

4star

HB

5.1

3star

M

3.4

3star

T

1.5

2star

MG

284.5

4star

D

10.6

3star

K

7.2

3star

HB

3.4

3star

M

2.4

3star

T

1.4

4star

(Cat A Rookie 1st Year)

Contract Expires- 2027:
Riak Andrews
Ned Bowman
Billy Cootee
Caiden Cleary
Jesse Dattoli
William Edwards (Cat A Rookie 1st Year)
Will Green
Brodie Grundy
Tom Hanily (Cat A Rookie - 3rd Year)
Max King

Multiple players found. Use birthday to differentiate. eg [PLAYERCARD="23/11/1962"]Joe Smith[/PLAYERCARD]

Peter Ladhams
Tom McCartin
Hayden McLean
Lewis Melican
Jevan Phillipou
Matthew Roberts
Angus Sheldrick
Patrick Snell
Chad Warner
Corey Warner

Contract Expires - 2028:
Braeden Campbell
Errol Gulden
Issac Heeney
Harry Kyle
Logan McDonald
Tom Papley
Malcolm Rosas Jr
James Rowbottom
Jai Serong
Sam Wicks

Contract Expires - 2029:
Callum Mills

Contract Expires - 2030:
Charlie Curnow

35

Charlie Curnow

Age

28

Ht

194cm

Wt

94kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

13.3

3star

K

9.7

4star

HB

3.6

3star

M

5.3

5star

T

2.2

4star

G

1.3

5star

No current season stats available

D

10.8

3star

K

6.4

3star

HB

4.4

4star

M

3.2

4star

T

1.6

4star

G

0.8

4star

Contract Expires - 2031:
Nick Blakey

 

[Mick Oxlong]

Sometimes I think the hat is the only thing he wears.

Not a reply so obviously doesn't wear the pants!

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Why isn't he getting paid more than Buddy?

Because he's not as good as Buddy. One could also say, Buddy doesn't do his ankle we win the Grand Final.

Now I'm no Richards basher, but if Reid was playing instead of XR, we would have won that game.

I'm staggered that so many people can't see the value that Reid brings to the table.

 

[swansfan51]

Because he's not as good as Buddy. One could also say, Buddy doesn't do his ankle we win the Grand Final.

Now I'm no Richards basher, but if Reid was playing instead of XR, we would have won that game.

I'm staggered that so many people can't see the value that Reid brings to the table.

Reid isn't worth 4 goals a game on his own, and the gap between him and someone who was already playing definitely isn't 4 goals

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Reid isn't worth 4 goals a game on his own, and the gap between him and someone who was already playing definitely isn't 4 goals

If you judge the value of 4 goals as being taking marks 30m out and slotting goals, no, he is probably not.

If you judge 4 goals of value in keeping certain defenders accountable, preventing easy run out of half back, switching to a defensive role when Tom Boyd starts to find his range, causing Tippet to be isolated one on one in the goal square......etc etc.

It wasn't a 4 goal game and you know it. It was 1 point with 7 minutes to go. It was a game about periods of ascendancy. Reid would have given us greater value for our periods of ascendancy than XR and would have been a handy and effective intercept mark during the periods of Dogs ascendancy. Even with the other things that went against us, which are well covered in other threads, I have no doubt that Reid playing would have led to a far different outcome.

 

[Teddy chester]

What's going on with heeney's contract?

 

[Tedeski]

What's going on with heeney's contract?

He's leaving us. Hence why he didn't want to do the time trial today!
Couldn't be f . k . d since he'll be leaving. Waste of time.

 

[Teddy chester]

He's leaving us. Hence why he didn't want to do the time trial today!
Couldn't be f . k . d since he'll be leaving. Waste of time.

Towers was the signature I wanted us to get anyway, well done swans and all the best Isaac

 

[Punts]

So Reid plays we win


Lol

 

[Tedeski]

So Reid plays we win


Lol

Guaranteed!

 

[Tedeski]

Absolutely 200%!

 

[Tedeski]

Without a doubt!

 

[Cadsky]

Someone should update his wiki

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

So Reid plays we win


Lol

I did actually justify my statement. A worthy Blood might have addressed the argument rather than simply sneer at it.

 

[Mick Oxlong]

If you judge the value of 4 goals as being taking marks 30m out and slotting goals, no, he is probably not.

If you judge 4 goals of value in keeping certain defenders accountable, preventing easy run out of half back, switching to a defensive role when Tom Boyd starts to find his range, causing Tippet to be isolated one on one in the goal square......etc etc.

It wasn't a 4 goal game and you know it. It was 1 point with 7 minutes to go. It was a game about periods of ascendancy. Reid would have given us greater value for our periods of ascendancy than XR and would have been a handy and effective intercept mark during the periods of Dogs ascendancy. Even with the other things that went against us, which are well covered in other threads, I have no doubt that Reid playing would have led to a far different outcome.

You know you've got sw51 beat when he doesn't respond...he'd hate it too!

 

[Mick Oxlong]

So Reid plays we win


Lol

He's on an AFL list, XR isn't...we'Ve already won!

 

[Cadsky]

You know you've got sw51 beat when he doesn't respond...he'd hate it too!

Or he believes the post is so moronic it doesn't warrant a reply?

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Or he believes the post is so moronic it doesn't warrant a reply?

Interesting. Did you think it was moronic?

 

[swansfan51]

Interesting. Did you think it was moronic?

Punts already summed up my view

Anyway this is the Contract Status thread, and miggs will soon remind us that this is off topic!

 

[Cadsky]

Interesting. Did you think it was moronic?

No I think both points have merit. But I don't think anyone can say for certain that had Reid played we definitely would or would not have won.

Anyway this isn't about what I think. SF51 will probably delete this for being off topic.

 

[GotTheGoodes]

That 2018 list is fairly large now with some significant talent which we may not have valued as highly when we signed their last contracts. The few that stand out to me are probably Double A, Paps, Hewy & Marshy (given he gets a run this year over Laids).

It'll be interesting where Naisy, Tippo & Sinkers are in the pecking order at that point too. If Tippo spends another year or so injury free he should be able to squeeze out 1 last good contract but I'm not sold he will be in the position to demand too much if Naisy really stands up in the meantime.

NicNew also an interesting one. I hope he gets a good crack this year along with Marsh.

Big year coming up leading into contract negotiations. Hopefully it spurs a few to launch their careers into the stratosphere.

 

[miggs]

Player X now has to line up at centrelink.

 

[Kirkswan]

Player X now has to line up at centrelink.

Yes, silly boy... mind you I'm not sad to see the back of him!

 

[Superstar swan]

Priorites this year should be Heeney, AA and mills

 

[GotTheGoodes]

Going to be interesting. I reckon Heenz, Jones, Hewy, DoubleA & Millsy would all be getting massive offers thrown at them by rivals.

I think Heenz & Millsy are fairly safe to stay on.

The one I worry about the most is Jones. He & his brother have a very strong relationship & maybe Zak wants to play with Nath before Nath hangs them up?

Not sure about AA or Hewy. I'd hope they could see they are the next group of best 18s & if they stay they are in the best place to reward effort. Not sure of Georges strength of family connection in SA but I do know AA has a fairly strong family connection in WA which could be a worry (I'm thinking Freo would love him & throw the kitchen sink at him).

I reckon that'll be it for Macca.

Reid, Talia & BJack are all in the same boat re: need to show something in 17 to either create interest from rivals or to be rewarded. At this stage they aren't priorities unfortunately IMO. Perhaps they can push themselves up the order with a solid consistent year though.

 

[GotTheGoodes]

I reckon the most talk will be around JPK. I reckon the Hawks are creating space for him. They are envisioning Hodge & Burgoyne both heading off into the sunset with the triumphant return of a Kennedy. It's a long shot, I don't think he'll go, but anythings possible. Where theres an emotional connection it's hard to discount the option.