- May 8, 2007
- 48,686
- 71,373
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #351
He is correct though.You’ve been posting here for ages. Who warned you? How would you not have formed an opinion of your own by now?
BF politics is extremely left based. That's a fact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is correct though.You’ve been posting here for ages. Who warned you? How would you not have formed an opinion of your own by now?
yes leftist/communist infiltration into colleges and universities IS a real danger, this is where they SHAPE minds.
those woke students grow up and become something. This is why there is huge investment to infiltrate theses places.
oh you didn’t know that did you?
do you know how much corruption exists in politics?
once you get some life experience come back for a chat.
otherwise don’t waste your time.
But what do you mean by that?
In theory, what could/should the incoming Biden administration do to persuade the rusted-on Trumpists that the election wasn't stolen?
How do you unify with that?
You've got a percentage of the country who have been misled to the point they reject the routine, legal operations of liberal democracy. The Biden administration has to meet these people in the middle? No, I don't think so.
What's the inconsistency?There's no good reason to compromise on the truth like Biden's election win, but I don't think you lose anything by being consistent in response to threats and riots. With more consistency they wouldn't have breached the Capitol.
Thats a high bar. Nobody running for president is going to openly endorse looting. Even Trump wouldn't explicitly call for a riot.What's the inconsistency?
Did Biden endorse the looting that spilled out from the BLM protests? Who endorsed looting?
So what's the inconsistency?Thats a high bar. Nobody running for president is going to openly endorse looting. Even Trump wouldn't explicitly call for a riot.
The inconsistency is in how half the country overlooks or even at times supports violent groups or actions from protest groups like antifa or blm.So what's the inconsistency?
I don't understand the argument.
Trump incited insurrection and told a mob to march on the Capitol while his election defeat was being certified. But on the other hand..... what?
What is the both sides/inconsistency critique here?
Or how those groups are made out to be more violent than they actually are. Right wing media highlights anything negative and ignores the vast number of peaceful marches.The inconsistency is in how half the country overlooks or even at times supports violent groups or actions from protest groups like antifa or blm.
Are we talking about people in government?The inconsistency is in how half the country overlooks or even at times supports violent groups or actions from protest groups like antifa or blm.
Or how those groups are made out to be more violent than they actually are. Right wing media highlights anything negative and ignores the vast number of peaceful marches.
This is where you come in.
Biden seems to dodge the question by saying that Antifa isn't an organisation.Are we talking about people in government?
Or just "the country"?
What is the inconsistency as far as Biden is concerned?
That aside, do you honestly see no difference between the grievances of the BLM protesters and the MAGA folks seeking to overturn the results of an election?
You don't have to agree lock-step with BLM to see the difference. I certainly don't. I think the racial justice movement in the US has gone out over their skis. And looting is criminal and should be prosecuted. But they didn't march on the Capitol seeking to prevent the peaceful transfer of power when their guy lost an election. That is indefensible.
If you think liberal democracy is worth defending/preserving, there's no equivalence there.
So what are you arguing?Biden seems to dodge the question by saying that Antifa isn't an organisation.
I'm not arguing an equivalence.
What is "left-wing media"? Everything that isn't explicitly conservative/RW populism?Right wing media does demonise them, but left wing media provides its own distortions.
Don't get drawn into this bullshit. Don't minimise this by way of a bogus analogy that says "but what about the left?"
Look at this statement. It is a deflection.I don't mean to deflect from the Capitol mobs or their significance. My view is that addressing violence on the left would see less violence on both sides.
Hey, you are claiming this happened so you provide the evidence.oh please look this up. she held back payment to put trump offside while the people who needed the payment suffered.
What a woman, she even got her hair done at a salon during a lockdown which she so vigilantly enforced. Go PILLocy.
There is a fairly good chance that fella John Sullivan is an FBI or Corporate plant/spy/infiltrator/provocateur. At least in terms of his so called antifa/BLM roles.
Look all I've got to go on is your posting vs the actions of Trump supporters.And you would know, go away child.
About six months of BLM people whinging about him.What's the evidence pointing to him being an FBi plant??
Having John Sullivan at the capitol, or having just one antifa/BLM supporter , is now evidence for all Trump supporters that the entire show was organized and ran by ANTIFA and the BLM movement.
They have already forgotten that they originally accused shaman man of being antifa...
This is the common online set of accusations against him: