Andrews Vs Perrie

[jc67]

Did anyone see the punchup?
who won?
why did it start?

REPORTS: Glenelg: Andrews, by umpire Williams for allegedly striking Perrie in the 23rd minute of the second quarter. North: Perrie, by umpire Rowston and boundary umpire Fallon for allegedly striking Andrews in the 23rd minute of the second quarter

 

[Crow_Magnon]

Could it be that they both saw a vacancy in the Crows line-up....with Carey's and Smart's retirements?

Certainly one way to eliminate a possible competitor!

 

[Tyson20]

both were given a reprimand by the tribunal...hmmm never hear of those anymore in the AFL

 

[jc67]

Originally posted by jc67
who won?

I guess it was a draw then

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Originally posted by jc67
why did it start?

Perhaps part of AFC's new policy to toughen up the players...

 

[naughty monkey]

Originally posted by jc67
Did anyone see the punchup?
who won?
why did it start?

nope. Unfortunately not there.
* MUCH gnashing of teeth *

I'm guessing Andrews "won" - Perrie came off with the blood rule.
Although I would add that I think if Perrie was really fair dinkum he could have done some serious damage.

Apparently Andrews (from memory, might be wrong) was felled by a late tackle.

Both landed some rippers. Both would have been out for a month if it was an AFL game.