- Joined
- Jun 19, 2017
- Posts
- 18,119
- Reaction score
- 30,975
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Since you're the legal expert, you've been asked before.Burden of proof is higher in Courts.
On what grounds can he be denied entry?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 13
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Since you're the legal expert, you've been asked before.Burden of proof is higher in Courts.
Thinks he's a pea heart who doesn't offer much when things aren't set up for him to succeed, he said it basically in Starcs first series. I think that opinion has more or less been proven correct over the journey.He is, but he makes this call almost every summer - would love to know exactly why he has an axe to grind with Starc.
Since you're the legal expert, you've been asked before.
On what grounds can he be denied entry?
Now you're just embarrassing yourself.Did he come by boat?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Now you're just embarrassing yourself.
You've been asked several time now on what grounds he could be denied entry.Nope. You are. Stokes seems a person of problematic character. Of course Dutton would endorse him as he has done others.
You've been asked several time now on what grounds he could be denied entry.
You just keep avoiding the issue.
Put up or shut up.
Onus of proof is different in Courts.
Most "traditions" in Australian cricket dare back to the post WSC period, I can remember watching ODIs on Boxing Day in the 80s, or in the case of the deification of the cap even more recently than that.
Horace is a stuffier character than Ian Chappell & Geoffrey Boycott.
I am many times older combined than that pair of bellybutton lint.
Not a chance… If anything he has already copped the most significant punishment of any player in history when it comes to ball tampering. Does not warrant a life ban at all.Should not have been allowed to play cricket after the SA disgrace.
Mind you the Poms have their own skeletons. I should be surprised Stokes was granted entry to the country after his thuggery.
Not a chance… If anything he has already copped the most significant punishment of any player in history when it comes to ball tampering. Does not warrant a life ban at all.
The alternative isn’t even Harris because he’s already getting a game, our openers would be Harris and Usman or something like that…The alternative is Harris enough said..

Didn't even warrant a ban at all, did we not see what FAF got?
The alternative isn’t even Harris because he’s already getting a game, our openers would be Harris and Usman or something like that…![]()
Not a chance… If anything he has already copped the most significant punishment of any player in history when it comes to ball tampering. Does not warrant a life ban at all.
Or Chandimal who got done what a couple months after these 3? People act like Smith and Warner committed the biggest crime in cricket history and will never forgive them, yet just about everyone in history that has done it has been ignored.Didn't even warrant a ban at all, did we not see what FAF got?
I doubt it, history says that’s unlikelyExpect Warner to be a walking wicket this summer.
Faf should have got life as well.
Or Chandimal who got done what a couple months after these 3? People act like Smith and Warner committed the biggest crime in cricket history and will never forgive them, yet just about everyone in history that has done it has been ignored.
Always read to the end...![]()
Boxing Day Test - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You sure?
Instead of a Test match a One Day International was held on 26 December 1989 at the Melbourne Cricket Ground between Australia and Sri Lanka. Australia won by 30 runs in front of a crowd of 45,012.