Just something that’s ive noticed lately. In discussing whether a reviewed goal has crossed the goal line, I’ve heard commentators (on multiple occasions) say something along the lines of ‘the padding is part of the post’, with the implication (I think) being that a goal is only a goal once the ball fully crosses the invisible plane between the back of each goalpost’s padding.
Now, imagine a dribbled goal crossing the goal line close to the midpoint of the goal posts. My understanding is that a goal umpire should call a goal once the entire ball has cross the back of the goal line.
So which is it? The back of the post or the back of the goal line? Surely there’s a need for consistency whether the ball goes through the middle of the posts or narrowly misses the lower part of the post? The difference is probably a matter of centimetres, but it’s an important difference.
Now, imagine a dribbled goal crossing the goal line close to the midpoint of the goal posts. My understanding is that a goal umpire should call a goal once the entire ball has cross the back of the goal line.
So which is it? The back of the post or the back of the goal line? Surely there’s a need for consistency whether the ball goes through the middle of the posts or narrowly misses the lower part of the post? The difference is probably a matter of centimetres, but it’s an important difference.