iBeng
Intentionally left blank
- Apr 3, 2012
- 58,148
- 66,409
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
This whole situation goes well with this...
NSFW language.
NSFW language.
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You got a link for that Drug Index by any chance? The unknown is killing me...This ties into the point I was previously making though on the purity of certain substances.
In instances where they are consuming a substance with 40% purity, what’s in that other 60%?
That mixture of the 60% could very well include substances that could be banned as performance enhancing but they will never know if they don’t test.
You got a link for that Drug Index by any chance? The unknown is killing me...
Sorta envisioning a WatchMojo "Top 10 Drugs" video without the link.
Sorry, my 15-min work break isn't enough to catch-up. At least 10 of those minutes are spent snorting 79% pure cocaine in the shitter.Already posted it. Maybe look back before trying to take pot shots mate
Not dorks. Most of us are happy with the policy. Don’t really want stoned or drunks driving around in heavy machines. Btw what do you do for a crust?Didn't realise miners were such dorks
He’s the sniffing accountant!Not dorks. Most of us are happy with the policy. Don’t really want stoned or drunks driving around in heavy machines. Btw what do you do for a crust?
Sorry, my 15-min work break isn't enough to catch-up. At least 10 of those minutes are spent snorting 79% pure cocaine in the shitter.
Once again, you've made a very good point as to why pharmaceutical companies should be in charge of supply. It would largely kneecap organised crime, ensure there is strong quality control, and prevent people from feeling ashamed to discuss their usage with medical professionals. The report you have linked demonstrates people don't give a s**t and will take illicit substances regardless, so I'm really struggling to see the negatives here.Good luck to you. Hopefully yourself and bailey aren’t consuming the stuff that’s 40% though and cut with substances that are known to cause significant damage to the brain, kidneys and respiratory organs.
FYI - that 79% is a significant outlier if you looked at the link but good luck to you
Not dorks. Most of us are happy with the policy. Don’t really want stoned or drunks driving around in heavy machines. Btw what do you do for a crust?
And I’d have thought that’s the view of any sensible, reasonable person.Haven’t read the thread so apologies if this line of thought has been done.
Smith shoukdnt have been suspended in my opinion.
What he did was in the off-season. If he had been tested positive in the off-season rather than sprung on social media it would have been an anonymous first strike. I don’t see why it should be any different in this case…..except the anonymous bit.
And I’d have thought that’s the view of any sensible, reasonable person.
exactly what it was.Reprimand for using drugs and two week penalty for embarrassing the AFL
Thats
exactly what it was.
hope he thanked DeStupidGoey for taking the heat off of him!