Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL followed by ROFL.Don't make me laugh. Hodge and Mitchell are so bloody overated.
Ablett and Bartel kill them in overall skills and performance.
Hodge has 1 decent game every 6 weeks. Sam Mitchell cops the better tag and would have to be considered the better player.Luke Hodge has probably got the best foot skills in the league. He can deliver a great pass on his left foot or his right.
Your avatar is totally g*y
Luke Hodge has probably got the best foot skills in the league. He can deliver a great pass on his left foot or his right.
So if Hodge decided to leave Hawthorn tomorow and you had to get rid of Bartel to make way in the salary cap, would you do it?
A Brownlow doesn't suddenly launch you above most others. Just look at some who have won them and some who have missed out.
did anyone actually watch Mitchell's performances in the finals ? average at best, made some absolute howlers. Gets a lot of it, but only average disposal; also got caught a couple of times in space when the majority of AFL players would have had enough awareness to know a bloke was closing down on them. His reputation dropped a few pegs as far as I'm concerned, and if he was happy with his output then he's got problems.
Ablett and Bartel have been brilliant in both finals they've played so far, hopefully more to come come Saturday.
A few have mentioned it on BigFooty recently. I am not trying to stir up things here, or even just pump up Jimmy to annoy everyone.
Just wondering what people think. Where do people rate him amongst the 2001 draftees?
FWIW, he was picked at number eight.
It does if you post on BigFooty.
If Mitch had got another few votes it would be Mitchell > Bartel > Ablett > etc
Discuss.
Hell no. Pre-Brownlow, still hell no.
And that is why you are roundly considered to be an idiot.
Hodge is one of the top five players in the AFL. Bartel, despite his Brownlow Medal is not.
Both Ablett and Bartel are much better players than Hodge.
Get in the idiot queue behind your mate then.
Just impossible to seperate Hodge / Bartel / Ablett / Mitchell at the moment - they've all achieved so much that there's little between them.
Judd
Hodge / Bartel / Ablett / Mitchell
Ball
Pull your head in. Take your Hawthorn goggles off nob jockey.
And of course, your point of view would be objective wouldn't it numbnuts?
Sure, if you say so, but I have more important things to worry about than arguing with a tosser like you who becuase his team is goooone, has nothing better to do than blindly defend his players in debates such as this one, even when he knows that his opinion is wrong.
And that is why you are roundly considered to be an idiot.
Hodge is one of the top five players in the AFL. Bartel, despite his Brownlow Medal is not.
My opinion is wrong is it dummy?
Perhaps we should poll Hodge v Bartel and then assess it. Until then, your opinion is about as credible.