- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
- Posts
- 11,734
- Reaction score
- 9,062
- Location
- Tas
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Gold City Royals
a brownlow medallist - by definition they are favoured by the umps
What about Toney Lockett Brownlow & Coleman!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

WB v SYD · RIC v MEL · HAW v GCS · ESS v COL · PA v GEE · FRE v CAR · StK v WCE · BL v ADE · GWS v NM ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
a brownlow medallist - by definition they are favoured by the umps
Jason Dunstall v Shane Woewodin?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
A Coleman means you have a gun KPF. I'll take that over a gun midfielder.
But the forward is already kicking enough goals to win the Coleman.brownlow need a gun in midfield to drive to the forward
Starting a team from scratch what you prefer in your team. A Coleman or a Brownlow medalist?

Scott Cummings kicked 95 goals that year. You can fluke a Brownlow, because it's subjective. You can't fluke a Coleman.
Leigh Mathews Coleman medalist non Brownlow Carey, Gaz Snr, Dunstall all same. Makes it more interesting.Brownlow, presuming it's in the engine room - the midfield. Would take Ablett/Judd over Franklin/JR to build a club around.
You can't fluke a Brownlow either. You have more chance of fluking a GF win than fluking either award.Scott Cummings kicked 95 goals that year. You can fluke a Brownlow, because it's subjective. You can't fluke a Coleman.
Then you can also fluke a coleman in years when the key forwards are injured etc. Matthews Coleman is considered weak due to the small number of goals he kicked, as is Neitz's who was competing against Kent Kingsley of all people.Of course you can fluke a Brownlow. A Brownlow is based on the opinion of three guys on whether or not you were one of the top 3 players out of 44.
You can't fluke a Brownlow either. You have more chance of fluking a GF win than fluking either award.
915 goals yea he didn't deserve a ColemanThen you can also fluke a coleman in years when the key forwards are injured etc. Matthews Coleman is considered weak due to the small number of goals he kicked, as is Neitz's who was competing against Kent Kingsley of all people.

LOL how many goals he kicked in his career is irrelevant. Richardson kicked 800 yet does that mean he deserved a Coleman? John Coleman will be surpassed by Steven Milne by the end of his career in goals kicked, yet this doesn't make him more worthy as a forward or a Coleman winner. Winners such as Matthews were criticised for winning in weak seasons just like Woewodin is for the Brownlow apparently. Even Longmire was canned for kicking only 90 goals in 90. The argument either goes both ways about fluking a win or it doesn't.915 goals yea he didn't deserve a Coleman![]()
Well why bring up Matthews when you could have easily bought up Wade? TrollLOL how many goals he kicked in his career is irrelevant. Richardson kicked 800 yet does that mean he deserved a Coleman? John Coleman will be surpassed by Steven Milne by the end of his career in goals kicked, yet this doesn't make him more worthy as a forward or a Coleman winner. Winners such as Matthews were criticised for winning in weak seasons just like Woewodin is for the Brownlow apparently. Even Longmire was canned for kicking only 90 goals in 90. The argument either goes both ways about fluking a win or it doesn't.