Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Changes vs Bulldogs

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

see, i'd say that any turbulance created is VERY necessary right now. this side needs a shake up.

and the 4, 5, 6 changes stat may be accurate, but how many teams likely to win would be making that many changes anyway?
I agree that a level of turbulence is necessary, in order to shake the players up out of their lackadaisical attitude. Changing 4-6 players goes beyond that and the team loses a lot of cohesion due to turning over too much of the side.
 
Essendon made 5 changes from last week's team and they seemed to go alright.

And you may say 'oh, well they were only playing against St Kilda'. We're playing against an injury ravaged WESTERN BULLDOGS. Even if we had made 6 changes I would have been bitterly disappointed if we didn't win the game.

Also how depressing is it checking out Glenelg games on the SANFL site. Lyons' name is just permanently locked at the top. Better play Tom Lynch.
Just my luck that a rare win happens the night I make my statement - my guess is that clubs making 4+ changes would lose 95% or more of their subsequent games. Congratulations to the Bombers for bucking the trend.
 
Centrals lose again :thumbsu:

Would be awesome... if Sturt didn't just lose to South.

Lyons just the lazy 25 touches but apparently was so slow that he was moving backwards at various stages. Also has grown a shell and leaves a slimy trail.
 
Centrals lose again :thumbsu:

Would be awesome... if Sturt didn't just lose to South.

Lyons just the lazy 25 touches but apparently was so slow that he was moving backwards at various stages. Also has grown a shell and leaves a slimy trail.
Apparently Harper was seen heckling him at the breaks
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom