TempleKelvington
Cancelled
- Sep 23, 2009
- 6,096
- 5,130
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
I think this weeks selections are more about the weeks ahead than the game tomorrow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Could nt Disagree more - this game is a final for both teams. I think we've set ourselves to give it our bestI think this weeks selections are more about the weeks ahead than the game tomorrow.
Yeah, it's not really my point, I think we are looking ahead. Not saying we are not trying to win this game, but we have fast tracked players in order to have them better prepared for the weeks to come.Could nt Disagree more - this game is a final for both teams. I think we've set ourselves to give it our best
Holy shit. We must change our senior team more than any other club.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
In that case - Hrovat in!Jong plays
We lose
It's that's simple and has been for 12 months against decent teams.
No one wants to hear it but it's now beyond me being annoying it's a dead set certainty
Couldn't be any worseIn that case - Hrovat in!
Jong plays
We lose
It's that's simple and has been for 12 months against decent teams.
No one wants to hear it but it's now beyond me being annoying it's a dead set certainty
Ha ha. I just watched the last 2 minutes of the game against the Swans last year, featuring both Jong and Hrovat. I must admit, I thought of MD.Lets not do this again![]()
Smaller ground?Does anyone else think Honeychurch was a bit stiff to be dropped? Played exceptional in his first game against port, was ordinary againts Geelong but most of them were. Maybe Bevo decided to go with the bigger bodies on the smaller ground ?
Unfortunately think he's gone at the end of the year. Has been treated terribly by the MC.Does anyone else think Honeychurch was a bit stiff to be dropped? Played exceptional in his first game against port, was ordinary againts Geelong but most of them were. Maybe Bevo decided to go with the bigger bodies on the smaller ground ?
Smaller ground?
Jong plays
We lose
It's that's simple and has been for 12 months against decent teams.
No one wants to hear it but it's now beyond me being annoying it's a dead set certainty
Does anyone else think Honeychurch was a bit stiff to be dropped? Played exceptional in his first game against port, was ordinary againts Geelong but most of them were. Maybe Bevo decided to go with the bigger bodies on the smaller ground ?
SCG is a bit larger than Etihad, though there's not a great amount in it.Probably what I would assume is the case.
Unfortunately think he's gone at the end of the year. Has been treated terribly by the MC.
Can you come up with anything better than that? PatheticJong plays
We lose
It's that's simple and has been for 12 months against decent teams.
No one wants to hear it but it's now beyond me being annoying it's a dead set certainty
He didn't do himself any favours with his performance against Geelong. He was being beaten for pace and clean skills below the knees when he was matched up against 190+cm KPD's.Unfortunately think he's gone at the end of the year. Has been treated terribly by the MC.
Thought he was better than good to fair against Port and everyone was woeful against Geelong.Too many in front of him . A limited player with limited ability.
Been very good in the VFL no doubt , He was good to fair v Port , woeful v Cats.
So with the ins this week he had to go.
So you drop a player immediately?He didn't do himself any favours with his performance against Geelong. He was being beaten for pace and clean skills below the knees when he was matched up against 190+cm KPD's.
I meant it more in the sense it was poor game immediately before best 22 players return, so he didn't do himself any favours with this specific performance when the he's competing with the likes of Jong for a spot who played a much better game.So you drop a player immediately?
Think it's pretty obvious he's not in the future plans of the MC, hopefully he carves out a nice career elsewhere.
After 5 horrible games. Yet he continues to get chance after chance, but Honeychurch is straight out after being made to work for it all year.I meant it more in the sense it was poor game immediately before best 22 players return, so he didn't do himself any favours with this specific performance when the he's competing with the likes of Jong for a spot who played a much better game.
Thought he was better than good to fair against Port and everyone was woeful against Geelong.
Also wouldn't say a bloke who's only played two VFL games in 12 months is ahead of him.
Love Clay but I think Honeychurch deserved another week (at least) ahead of him.
So you drop a player immediately?
Think it's pretty obvious he's not in the future plans of the MC, hopefully he carves out a nice career elsewhere.
I'd like to see him actually be given a chance to see if he has anything to offer at AFL level. As it stands he gets two weeks (one good, one bad) after knocking down the door all year and it's straight out for a bloke that's done three knees and only started running a couple of months ago.Give me a half fit Smith in front of honey anyday. Game is to important Immortal .
I agree it does seem harsh , cause we had many very poor players v the cats.
My problem is , I just don't see what Honey has to offer at AFL level.