Mega Thread Delist/Trade/Draft Super-mega-ultrathread

[ziad]

Also worth noting that Coniglio was dropped last weekend. GWS has Ward, Scully, Palmer, Treloar, Greene, Whitfield, Shiel, Tyson, Miles, Adams and ...... shit they have a lot of midfield talent. I don't think sending Coniglio back home will hurt them regardless of which draft pick he was.

The real question is could we fit him in.

sorry.....

 

[GoldenEagle]

The real question is could we fit him in.

sorry.....

Good point

 

[Spooky17]

Why not trade Sinclair?

Much prefer to keep Lycett, his great potential is starting to show in the WAFL ranks. Will be cherry ripe once thick Cox pulls the pin.. assuming Lycett will wait that long. Is Lycett contracted for next year?

 

[Spooky17]

The real question is could we fit him in.

sorry.....

We'd create a gap and force him in

 

[Chris_6678]

Much prefer to keep Lycett, his great potential is starting to show in the WAFL ranks. Will be cherry ripe once thick Cox pulls the pin.. assuming Lycett will wait that long. Is Lycett contracted for next year?

Yeah he is.... Lycett is playing some excellent footy in the WAFL so i think HAS to stay so we can have Lycett and Nic Nat and no doubt Sinclair could play a forward role along with those 2 when Cox retires.

 

[kane249]

Why would we be busting a gut to get the number 1 pick, when the apparent consensus #1 is a Victorian key forward prospect? He might well become a very good player but he doesn't seem to fill a pressing need for us, plus he'll take a few years to come good and by then the go-home factor may well have set in.

Let the Blues, Dogs etc throw players and picks at GWS for him. Why would we get involved in that war?

Good points Fivey, the other factor to consider is due to the mini-draft pick 1 this year is essentially pick 3 with Martin and Hogan already gone.

 

[BOND 007]

Clubs need 3 ruckman and with Cox's end likely to be short term, why would WC contemplate trading either Lycett or Sinclair ?. And lets be honest, GWS aren't going to offer a high pick for either so its a pointless exercise.

 

[Spooky17]

Clubs need 3 ruckman and with Cox's end likely to be short term, why would WC contemplate trading either Lycett or Sinclair ?. And lets be honest, GWS aren't going to offer a high pick for either so its a pointless exercise.

Agreed on the 3 ruckman, but could we have NN, Sinclair/Lycett + draft/rookie pick? Then can have the 3 rucks and a fair pick too?

 

[erbenz]

Watching U/18's and while Patrick Cripps has been good, Dunstan has been exceptional. WA have really missed Sheed as well.

 

[Chris_6678]

Watching U/18's and while Patrick Cripps has been good, Dunstan has been exceptional. WA have really missed Sheed as well.

Did Acers play?

 

[erbenz]

Did Acers play?

Acre's is playing, made a blue on the HFF line and played on when he shouldn't have but hasn't done too much aside from that.

 

[Spooky17]

Who's our best bet with our first pick assuming around pick 8-12?

 

[Noctorniquet]

Did Acers play?

has been very quiet so far

 

[Chris_6678]

I hope we can land Sheed but he looks like a top 7 pick...but there a few teams who might draft some talls that would probably be a later pick early as there are not alot this year.

 

[Spooky17]

I hope we can land Sheed but he looks like a top 7 pick...but there a few teams who might draft some talls that would probably be a later pick early as there are not alot this year.

Would love Sheed... who's next on the list should he go early? Acres, Marsh, or even Garlett?

 

[Noctorniquet]

clem smith looks like he will be a very handy player, could be one to watch

 

[Chris_6678]

Would love Sheed... who's next on the list should he go early? Acres, Marsh, or even Garlett?

If we can get Sheed if not Acres would be the best bet for a first rounder and then we get Garlett with our 2nd rounder. With our later picks maybe we get a proper small forward and maybe a defender.

 

[Jimmy_the_Gent]

Also worth noting that Coniglio was dropped last weekend. GWS has Ward, Scully, Palmer, Treloar, Greene, Whitfield, Shiel, Tyson, Miles, Adams and ...... shit they have a lot of midfield talent. I don't think sending Coniglio back home will hurt them regardless of which draft pick he was.

Coniglio re-signed earlier this year. I wish I knew for how long.

 

[Chris_6678]

Coniglio re-signed earlier this year. I wish I knew for how long.

I could be wrong but i swear i read somewhere it was till the end of 2015 as he signed an extension earlier this year.

 

[erbenz]

If we can get Sheed if not Acres would be the best bet for a first rounder and then we get Garlett with our 2nd rounder. With our later picks maybe we get a proper small forward and maybe a defender.

Would rather Cripps than Acres if we can't get Sheed. Judging from today's performance, Acres would be a chance to slip a fair way down IMO.

Also, we can't be too WA conscious, some great guys running around from SA and the Vic teams that are very good options for us (i.e. Dunstan, Billings, Crouch, even Schorenberg).

 

[Noctorniquet]

agree, i know it was only 1 game but acres didnt fire a shot, plenty of guys were better than him today

 

[The Falcon Strike]

What is Yarran's contract status at the moment?

Looks like he has the shits on with Mick, not sure his ego would be liking being played as a sub.

Get NN in his ear?

 

[Monsterdarlz]

Any chance we could potentially trade our first pick plus someone for congilio?

 

[Noctorniquet]

What is Yarran's contract status at the moment?

Looks like he has the shits on with Mick, not sure his ego would be liking being played as a sub.

Get NN in his ear?

Then we just need walters in 3 years and we have the street crew back from swan districts

 

[Jimmy_the_Gent]

What is Yarran's contract status at the moment?

Contracted until the end of 2014.