Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Just once what I'd love to hear from someone running this angle is what compensation they think Buddy should have generated. Same with Frawley, same with McKay. Just tell us how you think the system should work
It really is incredible. People on here think he makes decisions on his own. It'd be Rawlings, Thursfield, Clayton, Clarko and Viney all coming to a group decision on the move and then it probably gets ticked off by the CEO/Pres/Board as well.The Rawlings bashing on here is completely out of hand and based on very little evidence.
Pretty much this, but with two goats instead of one...Me too. I'd prefer to go to the nearest active volcano, get a bucket of burning lava and pour it into each ear if it meant I could avoid hearing this drivel.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yes in a Chancey Gardiner kind of way, he revealed that he isn't speaking in metaphors, and that he really is just a moron.Yeah pretty much. What an idiot!
Can I say though, in an odd way, I kind of enjoyed him telling us all what he really thinks. There was something refreshing about it, even if it was mostly dumb
No current season stats available
The absolute audacity of Chris Scott. Arguably no club has benefited more from the Father/Son rule than Geelong. And then last year their rorting of the Salary Cap dump which gave them Pick 7 as well, yet he is happy to spout his rubbish. He should be ashamed of himself.
If there was no F/S rule then we would have had Nick Daicos, a far better Pick 1 than mummy's boy from the 2021 Draft.
We might well have taken Will Ashcroft last year, though I am more than happy with Harry. Irrespective, no F/S rule would have meant that West Coast would have taken whoever we didn't take out of Harry and Ashcroft.
Take away the NGA and we would have had a third choice, being Cadman and in 2020, Ugle-Hagan would have gone to another club.
If people are going to get all salty about things like this, then they should call for all compromised draft situations to be abolished and then his comments would become valid, in that the natural order of the draft rewards you for being at or near the bottom of the draft.
Imagine how last year (2022) we might have performed if we had have been able to draft Nick Daicos instead of s***forbrains. I don't think we would be needing to ask for assistance if we hadn't have to compete in a highly compromised situation.
So get this folks... Nick Riewoldt just had his say on Triple M. He thinks we should receive nothing because there are other equalisation measures that the AFL had available and they have chosen the wrong one and we don't deserve it because we did it to ourselves and we played 8 finals in the last 10 years compared to the Saints etc etc. This coming from a person whose entire career unfolded as a result of being a priority pick at a club that played in a grand final just 3 years prior. FFS, irony much?
floginess is off the scale with this bloke, plus cant piss another oppo to post this,So get this folks... Nick Riewoldt just had his say on Triple M. He thinks we should receive nothing because there are other equalisation measures that the AFL had available and they have chosen the wrong one and we don't deserve it because we did it to ourselves and we played 8 finals in the last 10 years compared to the Saints etc etc. This coming from a person whose entire career unfolded as a result of being a priority pick at a club that played in a grand final just 3 years prior. FFS, irony much?
Yes, I'd say so. RHJ is still contracted.Is this just Drury, Dawson, Free and Shiels?
(I say "just" because its reported elsewhere, just not officially confirmed)
A lot of cherry picking going on here. No finals in 7 years would be more relevant.
So Nick is able to quote the misinformation he heard from Bill & Ben on 360 last night?So get this folks... Nick Riewoldt just had his say on Triple M. He thinks we should receive nothing because there are other equalisation measures that the AFL had available and they have chosen the wrong one and we don't deserve it because we did it to ourselves and we played 8 finals in the last 10 years compared to the Saints etc etc. This coming from a person whose entire career unfolded as a result of being a priority pick at a club that played in a grand final just 3 years prior. FFS, irony much?
Repeat something enough and it becomes accepted fact.So Nick is able to quote the misinformation he heard from Bill & Ben on 360 last night?
Well done Nick, good listening mate
I still think it should have been 4, Saunders and 11 next year (tradable).Just putting this out there that MAYBE the media and Clubs via the AFL are playing 5th dimensional chess with us here on Bigfooty, remember when we thought we were being shafted via no pick 11 and no access to Sanders and offered some s**t second round picks as a consolation prize AND NOW we are lapping it up like kittens on crack milk because the media and clubs are salty as all hell.
WE ARE BEING PLAYED FOR FOOLS WHERE IS OUR ACCESS TO SANDERS AND OUR PICK 11 YOU *erS![]()
Imagine if we win our annual game at Geelong? It'll be nuclear.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
If Kayne Turner is one of them ill ******* explode
LolGil is on 360 tonight.
Apparently Robbo is going to get stuck into him over the draft assistance.
Good on ya Robbo, you let Gil know you think we were short-changed!Gil is on 360 tonight.
Apparently Robbo is going to get stuck into him over the draft assistance.