Carl Peterson
Delisted by the Hawks yesterday ........ any interest?
Delisted by the Hawks yesterday ........ any interest?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Carlton v Collingwood - Rd 6 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Pies at 64% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 6 Games
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 6
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad

He was delisted because he didn't want to put in the hard yards and wanted to return home instead. Can't see him even wanting to come here (with our notoriously strenuous preseason), let alone us wanting to take him on.
Garry Moss is an interesting one. Snagged a RS nom in R5 2009 with 24 disposals, 9 marks and 4 goals and now finds himself delisted.
Yeah against WC. Hes a dud.
Hawthorn are a basket case at the moment, they seem to lack any sort of leadership or list management skills at all. How they won a premiership is beyond me.
They complained all year that they didnt have a ruckmen, wade skipper seemed to step up and looked the goods, they then trade for a ruckmen who is injury prone and they delist the only two good ruckmen they have.
Delisting 13 players is an interesting fact in itself. How are they going to fill the spots?
im not complaining about carl peterson going. sounds like the right call, provided he had a good leadership structure above him and failed to take any notice. Ok If Im wrong about the ruckmen then so be it, but their were plenty of complaints from the hawks about a lack of ruckmen. just seemed odd and a little rash to make all those changes in a compromised draft and get rid of half decent ruckmen.
Croad was on the veterans list, will be replaced by Bateman (who will in turn need replacing on the senior list).Delisting 13 players is an interesting fact in itself. How are they going to fill the spots?
Croad was on the veterans list, will be replaced by Bateman (who will in turn need replacing on the senior list).
That leaves them with 7 senior & 5 rookie list positions..
They traded for 2 players, so that brings them down to 5 senior list position. Tuck will go on the rookie list, so that's 4 rookie list positions.
5 national draftees (possibly including 1x PSD) and 4 rookie draftees seems about right. Nothing to get too concerned about.
Thanks for the clarification. Sounded awfully daunting at face value. Given the apparent lack of depth in this draft though - is 5 picks too many?

