- Thread starter
- Banned
- #151
Is it his time to shine?Nishioka, not Nishikori.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Is it his time to shine?Nishioka, not Nishikori.
The game has changed.Over 30s are doing well this year.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Think Goffin can beat nadal though?The City Boyz, the stage is set in Monte Carlo. Do you like it?
Not sure.Think Goffin can beat nadal though?
Nah, the game has changed.Perhaps Thiem will make a breakthrough soon...
Nah, the game has changed.
Anyone under 30 now has the deck stacked against them. Ask Demosthenes and Belnakor.
Apparently anyone younger than that shouldn't really be expected to win anything of note. Because the game has changed.Right, well I don't know dem and bel.
For silly people to acknowledge their silliness.What exactly are you aiming for here?
You keep going on about the same thing that I've completely forgotten what your argument or point is in the first place!For silly people to acknowledge their silliness.
When your cat shits indoors and you run their nose in it, what are you aiming for?
That makes no sense.You keep going on about the same thing that I've completely forgotten what your argument or point is in the first place!
geech, glad is wasnt just me then.You keep going on about the same thing that I've completely forgotten what your argument or point is in the first place!
Haha don't worry so am I. No idea if it proves or disproves their point.does that prove Sweet Jesus point or does it hurt it??? i am still confused.
Without looking at the numbers, i am guessing Zverev is the youngest ATP masters winner for a long time.
Better sports science perhaps explains the increase in both.