Game Day: NAB Cup round 1 v Carlton/Port
- Thread starter brucetiki
- Start date
- Tagged users None
I am with Vader, although Milne is a bad example.... I think Walker is a half forward flank, who isnt quick but is exceptional big... Not many better kicks off a step from outside 50 in traffic....
- Jul 19, 2010
- 25,590
- 63,182
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Footypie32
especias secreto
The more I read this thread and read about Walkers strengths and weaknesses, the more I'm thinking he would be more suited to Matthew Richardson Wing/high HF role. He has endurance, but not very quick. He's evasive and good in traffic and can bomb a goal from 60m.
I reckon Truck would beat Tex over 20 metres.
Again, I don't care about Tex's chasing - in fact it's kind of embarrasing watching him try. On the other hand there's no excuse for him not working hard to get into space - as Buddy does unbelievably well.
Southerntakeover
Hall of Famer
I like how you've ignored the entire discussion, and gone back to just repeating the originally contended statement as fact.
You're right, the rubbish should all be removed.......I can't believe my summary of Tex's efforts last weekend gets bumped to a secondary board and this rubbish stays here
I guess I only got some of the rubbish.
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 77,345
- 152,003
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #435
I'm tired of all the Franklin hate on this board.
Leave him alone FFS
He's got a Coleman and a premiership, what more do you want?
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
I'm tired of all the Franklin hate on this board.
Leave him alone FFS
He's got a Coleman and a premiership, what more do you want?
Him in Crows colours?
look i love the bullshit as much as anyone.. but are you implying serious posts get moved but crap derailing of threads is okay now? I think you are. Tread carefully.
The player watch stuff being moved is being done because we want to grow the Locker Room board, not because we want to sweep player-related discussion under the rug.
It would be a boon to the forum to have a vibrant, regularly-updated Locker Room, much more so than haphazard two-page threads that vanish after two days never to be seen again.
At the moment it appears like your post is being "demoted" because so few people post in The Locker Room, but that's precisely why more posts need to end up there - people won't start posting there until there are posts to reply to.
Certainly we're not looking to stifle player discussion, quite the opposite (despite WALL-e's tongue-in-cheek dig above
) - I'd like to see our Locker Room subforum be as active as possible.
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
It's a tough one stabbie. I've only really just started to venture into the backyard and very very rarely venture into the locker room. I'm sure I'm not alone there. Personally, I'd like to see those player watch pages as stickies in this forum rather than a separate forum altogether. It's the old KISS principal - don't try and complicate things by adding layers, keep it simple so more people will use it. Just my ten cents worth.
I suspect that people don't visit The Locker Room because not much is posted there. You only need to look at other team subforums to see how well player watch subforums work when they're regularly contibuted to.
Growing pains
Growing pains
(you realise i'm just being deliberately provocative of course stabbie.. i understand exactly what your intent is.. i just don't think that's the best solution)
- Jul 25, 2010
- 32,674
- 18,767
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors NBA Champions
We get accused of trolling out own board, then you card and banned us for trolling and yet you do it all the time. Where is the accountability for the moderators.
You troll Walker, Dangerfield (by using that stupid nick name Danger mouse) and anyone with a sense of popular following and you troll them.
No wonder all the good posters are leaving. The common denominator is the change is moderators and how they troll.
Footypie32
especias secreto
The player watch stuff being moved is being done because we want to grow the Locker Room board, not because we want to sweep player-related discussion under the rug.
It would be a boon to the forum to have a vibrant, regularly-updated Locker Room, much more so than haphazard two-page threads that vanish after two days never to be seen again.
At the moment it appears like your post is being "demoted" because so few people post in The Locker Room, but that's precisely why more posts need to end up there - people won't start posting there until there are posts to reply to.
Certainly we're not looking to stifle player discussion, quite the opposite (despite WALL-e's tongue-in-cheek dig above
Thankyou Stabby. Finally a clear response as too the reasoning of this change. I dont feel it has been properly explained until now. I always felt the lockerroom was only for player news and stats rather than discussion. Will keep that in mind from now on.
Similar threads
