Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour GFC 2021 Player Trading, Drafting FA, Rumours and Wish lists... Part II

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah maybe. I guess I don't know all the details so hard for me to judge. Maybe it's a poor decision. Maybe they see him being at arms length from the playing group acting more as a technical consultant for the coaches rather than someone who has any definitive cultural impact. I'm not sold on the idea of getting him in the first place but depending on the how and why I don't see it as an uncontrollable situation.
Maybe he can be like the Smoking Man to Scott's Fox Mulder. Shrinking into the shadows and answering Scott's paranoid hypotheses with increasing obscurantism. No-one really knows who he actually works for.
 
Does anyone have a direct link to the 2006 off season review chat?? Would be interested to see how many of our soon to be next season premiership superstars were either considered trade material or just C/B graders on here.

players can take time to come into their own and become stars and it is not always obvious early on either.

mid anyone does have a link to it would be a good read to see how they were rated until that point
 
This is a symptom of the high volume, low quality draft strategy. Geelong has taken the 4th most national draft selections since 2011 but has had access to the worst draft picks during that time (ranked by DVI).

Incidentally, Hawthorn ranks near last in both.

This cuts to the meat of it.

It's not so much that we have not visited the draft, its that we have just not been able to access enough high quality chances. The result is a revolving door on drafted talent.

I can only hope we do a little better this year... the cruz of our best22 will have to go soon..so at least the drafted talent will get more opportunity even at the cost of some games.
 
Does anyone have a direct link to the 2006 off season review chat?? Would be interested to see how many of our soon to be next season premiership superstars were either considered trade material or just C/B graders on here.

players can take time to come into their own and become stars and it is not always obvious early on either.

mid anyone does have a link to it would be a good read to see how they were rated until that point
There aren’t many reviews in there but here it is: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/official-geelong-player-review.269738/

There’s also a “Where will the improvement come from?” Thread like this year’s one which is “interesting” reading (or embarrassing for some (me)).
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Does anyone have a direct link to the 2006 off season review chat?? Would be interested to see how many of our soon to be next season premiership superstars were either considered trade material or just C/B graders on here.

players can take time to come into their own and become stars and it is not always obvious early on either.

mid anyone does have a link to it would be a good read to see how they were rated until that point

The main trust I remember was frustration. We had gone from an honourable PF loss, to the semi final loss in the see but don't believe it game, to a look where all the years was going to be wasted ..yet again.

The look of our side mainly look good players but it looked like we lacked high quality. We had some that looked like the typical wasters of talent, pretty sure that was the year Mooney got reported 4 times? Milburn was undisciplined and Ablett was just playing on talent , and had not tried to elevate beyond that.


In the space of 12 months , that changed to having a side of AA players...id say in a similar fashion to how we will soon look at Melb.

The key to that was the underlying talent was there. Some players finding their best level at their best age. The group becoming a melded group that had been developed together that was willing to do what ever they needed to do.. to avoid what it looked like..where they were heading was a repeat of so many years before.
 
If Scott is so good why do we need another "opinionated coach". Scope for conflict there. Further the game has changed since Lyon's day; has he changed with it?

With the draft we need:

3 mids who can actually kick the ball and hit targets

1 or 2 half backs to replace the dross we've got there now (Kolo, Atkins for starters)

1 or 2 forwards in the medium to tall range to replace Rohan and Esava ( who may yet earn a spot with natural improvement.

Zac Taylor would be great as would young Brown. I dream about a classy long-breaking left-footer but Wells seems to shun lefties for some reason.
 
There aren’t many reviews in there but here it is: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/official-geelong-player-review.269738/

There’s also a “Where will the improvement come from?” Thread like this year’s one which is “interesting” reading (or embarrassing for some (me)).

cheers catempire.

nah don’t stress, very hard thing to predict after coming 9th in 06.

have no interest in shaming anyone, more just interested to go back in time and observe a more realistic picture of how development works. It is not a linear transformation from drafting a bunch Of star kids with gradual incremental improvement to announcing the champs are here… it’s more of an up and down squiggly line filled with highs and lows and non predictability, until the day it all comes together.
 
Looking at a few of the recent phantoms I’m keen to trade up to secure another higher pick. Ideally Brisbane’s second but more realistically the Dog’s pick 23. Around that mark, having 2 consecutive picks, I’m confident we can secure 2 mids of good quality.

Agree with those that mention Zac Taylor - high production and has elite kicking skills. Really think he needs to be prioritized.

Knevitt and Connor MacDonald are the other two I’m particularly interested in. A tall mid that can win his own footy - tested well. And MacDonald, high production as well, wins his own footy, good skills.

They’re my 3. Whilst Brown looks a great option, I think our immediate priorities lie elsewhere just at the moment.
 
If Scott is so good why do we need another "opinionated coach". Scope for conflict there. Further the game has changed since Lyon's day; has he changed with it?

With the draft we need:

3 mids who can actually kick the ball and hit targets

1 or 2 half backs to replace the dross we've got there now (Kolo, Atkins for starters)

1 or 2 forwards in the medium to tall range to replace Rohan and Esava ( who may yet earn a spot with natural improvement.

Zac Taylor would be great as would young Brown. I dream about a classy long-breaking left-footer but Wells seems to shun lefties for some reason.

Although I agree, it's no different than bringing in Balme to oversee Bomber. It happens often, even if some of us aren't fans of it.
 
Although I agree, it's no different than bringing in Balme to oversee Bomber. It happens often, even if some of us aren't fans of it.
Wasn’t balme more of the head of the football department, rather than someone who was there to oversee coaching and strategy? 2 different positions.

Simon lloyd already has that position as head of the football department doesn’t he?
 
Balme was older than Bomber and probably a less abrasive personality; but if it works out well for us I won't complain.

Bomber was a strange unit but he knew footy: I heard him on ABC radio once commenting on a game and he described what was happening on the filed better than anyone I've ever heard.
 
Wasn’t balme more of the head of the football department, rather than someone who was there to oversee coaching and strategy? 2 different positions.

Simon lloyd already has that position as head of the football department doesn’t he?

Ugh I'm not sure which Lloyd is doing and which Lyon is alleged to be coming to do.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Does anyone have a direct link to the 2006 off season review chat?? Would be interested to see how many of our soon to be next season premiership superstars were either considered trade material or just C/B graders on here.

players can take time to come into their own and become stars and it is not always obvious early on either.

mid anyone does have a link to it would be a good read to see how they were rated until that point
I have a two page spread from the Herald Sun by Jon Ralph I kept Dated May 6 2007

Players gone backwards since 2005.

Brad Ottens
Steve Johnson
Charlie Gardiner
Tim Callan
Josh Hunt
James Kelly
Steven King
Tom Harley
Jarod Rooke
...........................................
Stagnated

David Johnson
Cameron Ling
David Wojcinski
Andrew Mackie
Shannon Byrnes
Corey Enright

..........................................
Improved

Garry Ablett
Jimmy Bartel
Joel Corey
Matthew Egan
Darren Milburn
Matthew Scarlett
Cameron Mooney
Mark Blake
.....................................................
Young Ones
Jason Davenport Nathan Djerrkura Ryan Gamble todd Grima Tom Hawkins Simon Hogan Stephen Owen Brent Prismall Joel Selwood Matthew Stokes Travis Varcoe Trent West Matthew Spencer

Injured
Tom Lonergan Joel Reynolds.
 
I have a two page spread from the Herald Sun by Jon Ralph I kept Dated May 6 2007

Players gone backwards since 2005.

Brad Ottens
Steve Johnson
Charlie Gardiner
Tim Callan
Josh Hunt
James Kelly
Steven King
Tom Harley
Jarod Rooke
...........................................
Stagnated

David Johnson
Cameron Ling
David Wojcinski
Andrew Mackie
Shannon Byrnes
Corey Enright

..........................................
Improved

Garry Ablett
Jimmy Bartel
Joel Corey
Matthew Egan
Darren Milburn
Matthew Scarlett
Cameron Mooney
Mark Blake
.....................................................
Young Ones
Jason Davenport Nathan Djerrkura Ryan Gamble todd Grima Tom Hawkins Simon Hogan Stephen Owen Brent Prismall Joel Selwood Matthew Stokes Travis Varcoe Trent West Matthew Spencer

Injured
Tom Lonergan Joel Reynolds.
Guess he got Callan & Gardiner somewhat right
 
We've had that gap badly for a while but our youngsters from the 2016 draft should step up and fill that gap now.

The gap on our list is the 5 years between Parfitt (23 years 5 months) and Cameron (28 years 6 months). We only have 5 players in that range and apart from O'Connor who I think will be a gun, they're unproven (Narkle) or just role players (Bews, Kolo and Atkins). It's sort of astonishing that we're so competitive with that age gap.

On the bright side we've got a lot of good young players who are moving in to that range and we should expect big improvements from this group over the next couple of years.

O'Connor was threatening to break out before injury and Parfitt, Simpson, Zuthrie, Ratugolea, Close, Henry, Stengle and Miers will all be 23 round 1 next year. That's a big and talented group who can and must improve for us to be competitive long-term.

So yes we'll probably look to add players in the 24-26 range in the next few years but the core group which we've been waiting a few years for is there now.
Not convinced on O'Connor anymore.

And imo, Ratugolea won't make it.

Zac Guthrie shouldn't be on our list.
 
Not convinced on O'Connor anymore.

And imo, Ratugolea won't make it.

Zac Guthrie shouldn't be on our list.
Id like to see MOC have a big pre season, if we can get his fitness base up he could easily transition into the midfield as an attacking threat and not just a tagger, simiarly to how he played back in his gaelic days, good size at 191/88.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If Scott is so good why do we need another "opinionated coach". Scope for conflict there. Further the game has changed since Lyon's day; has he changed with it?

With the draft we need:

3 mids who can actually kick the ball and hit targets

1 or 2 half backs to replace the dross we've got there now (Kolo, Atkins for starters)

1 or 2 forwards in the medium to tall range to replace Rohan and Esava ( who may yet earn a spot with natural improvement.

Zac Taylor would be great as would young Brown. I dream about a classy long-breaking left-footer but Wells seems to shun lefties for some reason.

I'm not seeing how Lyon's appointment would assist our quest for a faster, more finals capable, game plan........
 
Simon lloyd is football manager. Lyon is being asked to perform a strategy or coaching director position. According to the media reports.

My issue with it (which also goes along with Scotts extension) is I feel its just more of the same.
All mates, guys who likely won't question or really look to change things up.
The club just feels full of nepotism at the moment and keeping the status quo.
In fairness ladder position results probably suggest it's a good strategy, but it's one with a time limit that's about ready to go off (I reckon next season is our last genuine shot at competing, as in top 4, beyond that we'll face retirements of some all time greats and we'll fall away pretty badly).
 
Was there anything to take away from the Scarlo interview on 7news Melbourne tonight. Did he play the straight bat on everything asked or said what he felt ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top