Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour GFC 2023 Player Trading, Drafting FA, Rumours and Wish lists Pt II

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

PMBanger's latest observations on George Stevens are less than encouraging. Unless he startles us all at the Combine i'd want us to be looking elsewhere.

As for Oliver and Smith - forget it, we haven't got the capital.

Interesting to read Barlow's comments on Mannaghe and Clohessy - would either of those still be on the board at our second (Sav) pick?
 
Wouldn't it be a bit weird to wave the white flag already? We haven't even started the trade period yet.
No I don't think so. Clubs have a fair idea what the landscape looks like a fair way out from trade week. If you're looking at a contracted player I think it's even more clear cut.

Keep in mind too that with Bailey Smith being managed by Paul Connors, I think that makes it even more clear cut. Connors speaks highly of his dealings with Geelong and if he's told them no deal this year, then I think Geelong would accept that as gospel and focus elsewhere.
 
If Duursma is available, what would people prefer between him and a pick in the 25-30 range for Esava?

I've got some reservations about Duursma, but I think he's got a better chance of playing 100 games for us than someone drafted in that range, and is a good age for our list, so I'd be inclined to try and include him in discussions.

 
if sanders is still available at our pick do we select him or
fleece North for the pick
they may be willing to part with several future picks
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Interesting on trade radio the other day Phil Davis threw a comment about a club that JJ knows very well could be Adelaide but sounded like geelong that goes out of its way to interview players it has no hope of drafting but to plant some seeds for later down the track to try and trade for them in the future.
 
You dont know him to make this call....

People pretending to know his personality and mindset without knowing him, and making calls from the cheap seats are kidding themselves.
It's probably true that a lot of people are not writing from first-hand knowledge.

It also seems to be true that the club at which he has won three best and fairests is prepared to move him on. [2]

The sense with the Dees over the last two years is that they didn't go as well as they should have. That always, to me, suggests cultural issues, whether slackness, or conflict, or something else. [2]

I'm getting four ...
 
Why on earth would Dees put up Oliver for a trade it would be like us trading danger during his prime. It's been said but Dees know something they're not sharing with the rest of us, attitude issue or body perhaps a combination of both has Dees spooked with his contract length?
Oliver isn't like peak Danger, the Dees equivalent is Petracca which is why theres no chance they trade him.

But there must be something big going on because Oliver instantly makes every midfield in the league better. How bad do relationships or attitude have to be for you to contemplate trading someone just after they signed a massive deal.

Dursma/Lord are a safer bet than Bailey Smith who may or may not get his act together.
Duursma hasn't shown a lot at AFL level, Lord has had one big final and not much else. Smith has a far better track rate than those two, I don't think its safe to call any of the players in that list a safe bet but Smith has runs on the board more consistently.

Why does the AFL make draft week so long - it's taking the piss. Force clubs to get serious and do it over 3 days maximum. If you can't organise s**t in that time then move on.
Extended content = advertising/eyes on the product = money/engagement.

They could knock out trade week from a Friday to a Monday but theres no money in that. Need all the podcasts, radio shows with all their/the AFL sponsors constantly talking shit to keep people engaged because a lot of people drop off the AFL after the GF until late preseason when the matches start.
 
At that point we'd just want Sanders. He's a talent that i wouldn't trade away unless we got a GOD like offer.
Bit of a stretch. He's very good and I'd take him at 7 but he is very handball happy and not the quickest off the mark though combine numbers might mock me later on that.

He is what we need though so be good to get him
 

Remove this Banner Ad

He is cover for Jack Henry, and potentially Stewart as the Intercept marker. But yes, he is just break glass in total emergency KPD. We will need a KPD in the draft.

I wonder whether Jack's foot is worse than first thought?
 
if sanders is still available at our pick do we select him or
fleece North for the pick
they may be willing to part with several future picks
lol... he will be well and truly gone by then.
Norf will use pick 3 Hawks 4 even the Dees at 5 will take him.
Best pure mid in the draft.
Ready to play from Round 1.
 
If Duursma is available, what would people prefer between him and a pick in the 25-30 range for Esava?

I've got some reservations about Duursma, but I think he's got a better chance of playing 100 games for us than someone drafted in that range, and is a good age for our list, so I'd be inclined to try and include him in discussions.

We should take ZZ Top at 25.
Zane Zakostelsky. The Bolter of the draft?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It's not a roaring engine room. Guthrie is 31 and hasn't played for a year. Danger is creaking. The ruck situation is Stanley past his best, and a very green Conway. Apart from Atkins, all the other options are at the start or the end of their careers.
Danger creaked to 12 Brownlow votes still.

Holmes and Bruhn could easily break out. It's too early to call it on Bowes. Parfitt had a rough year but who knows. Atkins second half of the season was very strong. Blicavs was a late starter. Guthrie is fresh and ready to go.

Dangerfield: 17th season
Stanley: 15th season
Guthrie: 14th season
Blicavs: 12th season
Bowes: 8th season
Parfitt: 8th season
Atkins: 6th season
Holmes: 4th season
Bruhn: 4th season
Knevitt: 3rd season
Clark: 2nd season

Forgetting practicalities for acquiring them, Oliver in his 9th or Smith in his 6th season would arguably be the perfect addition.
 
So it seems like Oliver and Smith is staying at their clubs. I would rather just head to the draft now.

Not interesting in Wines, Duursma or Harmes.
Yes I think I'm with you on that.

No to Wines and Duursma, but I can see the benefit of bringing in a couple of fresh faces as "role players" like O'Brien and Harmes on peanuts. As a club we've done that well in the past, and if you look at the Pies GF side they had a few blokes who command little respect outside the walls of Collingwood, but clearly play a defined role and contributed to a premiership.

Markov from Richmond - Frampton from Adelaide - Mitchell from Hawthorn (who most people questioned at the time).
 
Yes I think I'm with you on that.

No to Wines and Duursma, but I can see the benefit of bringing in a couple of fresh faces as "role players" like O'Brien and Harmes on peanuts. As a club we've done that well in the past, and if you look at the Pies GF side they had a few blokes who command little respect outside the walls of Collingwood, but clearly play a defined role and contributed to a premiership.

Markov from Richmond - Frampton from Adelaide - Mitchell from Hawthorn (who most people questioned at the time).

I don't think either of those improve what we got though. O'Brien isn't a genuine KPD size so no help if SDK goes down. Only backup for for J Henry or Kolo.

We need to bolster the midfield with A grade or Elite talent . Harmes is a C grader at best, I would rather who we get with pick 7.

We have plenty of role players like Atkins or MOC that rotate through the middle. Need the actual meat here, not the potatoes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top