Limerick
Premiership Player
Veteran
North Melbourne - 2014 Daw, Black, Gibson Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2013 Daw, Black and Gibson Player Sponsorship
North Melbourne - North 2012 Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - North 2011 Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - North 2010 Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - North 2009 Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - North 2008 Player Sponsor
- Oct 2, 2006
- 3,499
- 1,849
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- North Melbourne Football Club (AFL)
- Thread starter
- #51
No problems. I'll send a letter off from me with no reference to this site or its contributors.
For the record my position on relocation is that I don't want it and importantly don't see it as a viable option for any Melbourne club, either at GC, ACT or Tasmania, within the next ten plus years. This I believe provides me with a strong logical and financial basis upon which to fight any relocation, rather than an emotional one.
My statement on the issue was "If our Victorian tenure became impossible, which is a situation that I cannot foresee within the life of this new Board, then I would favour relocation ahead of a merger or going out of existence. This doesn't mean that I'll accept relocation as a first option solution.
I accept that Mark, John and many others hold the view of no relocation at any cost and will not follow the club if it fully relocates. If it were to come to the crunch and I was on the board I would strongly and visibly request a poll of all adult members.
Mark, John K,
If you are successful in the election and a motion was put to the board to increase the number of games on the GC what would be your reaction?
For the record my position on relocation is that I don't want it and importantly don't see it as a viable option for any Melbourne club, either at GC, ACT or Tasmania, within the next ten plus years. This I believe provides me with a strong logical and financial basis upon which to fight any relocation, rather than an emotional one.
My statement on the issue was "If our Victorian tenure became impossible, which is a situation that I cannot foresee within the life of this new Board, then I would favour relocation ahead of a merger or going out of existence. This doesn't mean that I'll accept relocation as a first option solution.
I accept that Mark, John and many others hold the view of no relocation at any cost and will not follow the club if it fully relocates. If it were to come to the crunch and I was on the board I would strongly and visibly request a poll of all adult members.
Mark, John K,
If you are successful in the election and a motion was put to the board to increase the number of games on the GC what would be your reaction?