Remove this Banner Ad

Vic How would you rate Daniel Andrews' performance as Victorian Premier? - Part 6

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uh oh, Dan haters prepare yourselves.


Time for the rest of us to grab some popcorn, because the only ones involved in this cluster**** seem to be Novak, the Feds and TA.
 
But even the 30,000 today does not include those that weren’t able to be tested for both PCR and RATs so the number is actually a lot higher than 30,000
PCR positivity rate indicates minimum of just under 5x the recorded total.

So a realistic estimate for Vic would be 80-100k and for NSW 150-200k.

Thus we'd be looking at a peak in NSW within about 7-10 days and at some stage a combined PCR+RATs recording of 80k+. The Victorian peak is probably 14-21 days away.
 
Last edited:
And what a sterling job Jaala Pulford did. On the back of what she said someone senior like Dan should have said something. But that's not the issue. We have a ministry partly devoted to major events, and here is the acting premier doing her darndest to piss off TA. Not conducive to a strong partnership relationship.
You were way off with this comment.

Novak's court submission explicitly revolves around alleged federal government approval for his visa based on a possibly dishonest health deceleration and some communication with Tennis Australia.

The Vic gov has stayed well away from this.
 
Anyone with even a degree of political acuity and/or, to use your words, "a half- functioning brain" could see the politicisation by Scummo. However, even a cursory look around via the medya, forums , personal contacts should make you aware that reasonable political acuity isn't as prevalent as you appear to believe whereas "half-functioning" political brains are.

There is an abundance of peeps who don't believe Scummo's intervention was purely political. And that it was not a means of diverting attention from his myriad of stuff-ups (the latest being RAT) that moved him to make Novaxx politically front and centre. At least 3 tennis connected peeps have now been subsequently pursued as his boyos in an attempt to mop them up so it doesn't look so politically obvious.

And, believe it or not, there is an abundance of peeps who don't see Scummo as a pathological liar, are oblivious to his successive job failures, think he's trustworthy, and is doing a shipshape job. Why one character indicated on this forum only recently all's well cos peeps can still buy fuel and other items.
Correct.

The ABF even tried to bait Vic into giving him an "exemption" knowing he'd been let slip through the federal visa net.

Given the thorough briefing Fairfax and News seemed to have been given a week ago, it looks like the PMO has been hard at work.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You were way off with this comment.

Novak's court submission explicitly revolves around alleged federal government approval for his visa based on a possibly dishonest health deceleration and some communication with Tennis Australia.

The Vic gov has stayed well away from this.

Really? Even though in the court documents in the applicants outline of submission and throughout the document they state his medical exemption was endorsed by the Victorian government which they are trying to use as evidence for entitling him to be here? Wouldn’t call that staying out of it.
 
Really? Even though in the court documents in the applicants outline of submission and throughout the document they state his medical exemption was endorsed by the Victorian government which they are trying to use as evidence for entitling him to be here? Wouldn’t call that staying out of it.

TA and the Vic health panel used ATAGI guidelines and didn’t know who they were checking …. Probably the same guidelines the The Department of Home Affairs used!!!!

“we stopped the tennis players” !!!! It’s a bit too long for an LNP slogan.
 

Tennis Australia have been too cute by half.

Their ‘cunning loophole’ is: ‘It was unsafe for Djokovic to get vaccinated because he was recovering from being infected with Covid-19’. Relying on an ATAGI leaflet that advises “vaccination can be deferred in those with PCR- confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection until complete recovery from the acute illness (which may be up to 6 months)”.

TA suggested Djokovic might obtain a statement from a doctor, if he believed he had been infected in the past six months …. nudge, nudge, wink, wink.

The official position is: “Someone with an asymptomatic COVID-19 case can get vaccinated as soon as their isolation ends.”
 
Last edited:
Uh oh, Dan haters prepare yourselves.


Time for the rest of us to grab some popcorn, because the only ones involved in this clusterfu** seem to be Novak, the Feds and TA.
I don't think either Feds or State have much to worry about. Heads have to roll at TA and they have to pay the bills, and Novax must go.

Court papers show TA lied to the Vic govts panel and the Feds relied on Novax being honest and TA/Vic govt panel doing their job.

On SM-G570F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Unless Novak wins his appeal
Possible he has evidence that he has been recovering from an acute illness, after becoming infected with Covid-19, and medical advice was not to get vaccinated until he had fully recovered.

I doubt his FB posts will be tendered as evidence.

[Serbia's Prime Minister, Ana Brnabic, was the first European leader to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in Dec 2020, ‘illustrating an omnivorous approach to procurement that has Serbia at the front of the race to inoculate people’.

"Whether [vaccines] come from China, the US or EU - we don't care as long as they're safe and we get them as soon as possible.”]
 
Last edited:
its a long listen .... but interesting nonetheless

points of interest
- ben asks why the medical exemption process was not better coordinated with the feds
- paul suggests TA and vic gov officials believe the feds have made this a spectacle for political gain
 
Last edited:
its a long listen .... but interesting nonetheless

points of interest
- ben asks why the medical exemption process was not better coordinated with the feds
- paul suggests TA and vic gov officials believe the feds have made this a spectacle for political gain

In other words more anti Morrison pile ons , you’d love that 🙂
 
I was reading a thread by an immigration lawyer and visas are granted on the provision that supporting documents are provided upon arrival, its not about who said what its about what is the law. The judge will have to determine that
 
Possible he has evidence that he has been recovering from an acute illness, after becoming infected with Covid-19, and medical advice was not to get vaccinated until he had fully recovered.

I doubt his FB posts will be tendered as evidence.

[Serbia's Prime Minister, Ana Brnabic, was the first European leader to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in Dec 2020, ‘illustrating an omnivorous approach to procurement that has Serbia at the front of the race to inoculate people’.

"Whether [vaccines] come from China, the US or EU - we don't care as long as they're safe and we get them as soon as possible.”]
He tests positive to Covid in mid December 2021 and two days later is at a big function without face mask, shaking hands with well wishers congratulating him on having a postage stamp released with his face on it. It’s a sham!
 
Australia Day parade cancelled again.

“While the parade’s cancellation is not Covid-19 related, the state government has strenuously denied it is linked to a growing movement to boycott Australia Day on January 26”.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You were way off with this comment.

Novak's court submission explicitly revolves around alleged federal government approval for his visa based on a possibly dishonest health deceleration and some communication with Tennis Australia.

The Vic gov has stayed well away from this.
You posted yesterday you didn’t care about this saga but here you are posting on it. You do care
 
It is a legal case and most hearings are heard by video link now due to COVID. Unless there is a suppression order or ex parte application made all legal cases are matters of public record. Certain high profile decisions can be broadcast if the court decides this as being in the public interest.
They weren't querying the legal practice which has been in play for some time and much more so since Covid. They are IT pros who were expressing misgivings from an IT perspective which was my point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top