Remove this Banner Ad

Vic How would you rate Daniel Andrews' performance as Victorian Premier? - Part 6

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fun question. Jacinta Allan said yesterday;

“This is what happens with every Bill that comes through the parliament”

To what was she referring?

Debate, amendments.

This is taught in primary school. Perhaps you should read up on how democracy and parliament works?

After that, maybe you could share the new found knowledge with your friends on the steps.
 
They don't want to ban vaccines, the just don't want them mandated.

And Florida..

View attachment 1285576
View attachment 1285577

nope, they want them banned. they think they spread death and poison (they are not shy about screaming this shit online)

side note - wish these idiots would stop posting anti vaxxer shit on linkedin. my feed is borderline unreadable now
 
You mean another decision made based on internal polling rather than scientific data.
The question ought to be how the government botched this decision in the first place. A bit like the playground closure rule.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

That makes no sense.

The both want their freedom and rights. Whether it be to keep them or to have them restored. Same outcome if they get what want they want.
 
nope, they want them banned. they think they spread death and poison (they are not shy about screaming this sh*t online)

side note - wish these idiots would stop posting anti vaxxer sh*t on linkedin. my feed is borderline unreadable now

Linkedin pulls shit from Facebook or other sites you visit.

I deleted Facebook a year ago and linkedin still gives me requests to connect from people I have only whatsapped.

It's all interconnected and targeted like ads on here.

Stay away from anti-vax sites and you won't get them in your feed.
 
fu** me even if Florida's cases are coming down, how on earth you could consider the carnage left in its wake as any way responsible or the way to go is astounding

My question is what has changed to make it come down?
 
The both want their freedom and rights. Whether it be to keep them or to have them restored. Same outcome if they get what want they want.
One’s getting what they want, hence the goal post shifting. The other’s having what they want taken away. This is a fairly major distinction.
 
People who want their freedoms and rights returned are now seen as nutter.

What an age we live in.
people who are deluded into believing they are entitled to act differently to the law of the land because they are special snowflaakes and "mah freedumbs"?

yeah, they are nutter.
 
Linkedin pulls sh*t from Facebook or other sites you visit.

I deleted Facebook a year ago and linkedin still gives me requests to connect from people I have only whatsapped.

It's all interconnected and targeted like ads on here.

Stay away from anti-vax sites and you won't get them in your feed.

nah, i wish it was that

former work colleagues are posting the shit (i have one who no exaggeration is doing about 30-50 links a day - his work actually made him put a disclaimer on his profile now so they dont get linked to his shit)

I miss when linkedin used to be about work
 
people who are deluded into believing they are entitled to act differently to the law of the land because they are special snowflaakes and "mah freedumbs"?

yeah, they are nutter.

It's those in power implementing the laws who act special and entitled by not following the laws they introduced.

nah, i wish it was that

former work colleagues are posting the sh*t (i have one who no exaggeration is doing about 30-50 links a day - his work actually made him put a disclaimer on his profile now so they dont get linked to his sh*t)

I miss when linkedin used to be about work

There is a very easy solution to this problem.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

It's those in power implementing the laws who act special and entitled by not following the laws they introduced.



There is a very easy solution to this problem.

they are mates - if it was just former acquaintances or colleagues I would have unlinked long ago
 
It's those in power implementing the laws who act special and entitled by not following the laws they introduced.



There is a very easy solution to this problem.
has there been a government politician which has defied vaccination mandate? if you have a name spill, because that would be shit truck behaviour
 
The question ought to be how the government botched this decision in the first place. A bit like the playground closure rule.
I’ll hazard a guess.

Inmates running the asylum?
 
has there been a government politician which has defied vaccination mandate? if you have a name spill, because that would be sh*t truck behaviour

So would vaccinating a minor without parental consent.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Total side question but is it true that judges don’t need to be vaxxed?
that was earlier I think and was due to complexities around jurisdiction (federal employee vs state) I think it was sorted out that they would get vaccinated, but am not 100% sure.
 
when has that happened?

what if the minor (aged 12 - 15, and Gillick competent) wants to have vaccine even though parents disagree?

I'm guessing the same thing that happens if a 12-15yo wanted to leave school early, get a tattoo, marry, get a sex change, etc etc.
 
I'm guessing the same thing that happens if a 12-15yo wanted to leave school early, get a tattoo, marry, get a sex change, etc etc.
look at you playing right wing bingo
 
I'm guessing the same thing that happens if a 12-15yo wanted to leave school early, get a tattoo, marry, get a sex change, etc etc.
how about we confine it to medical issues hey (well sex change is medical but I'm one of the luddite type who thinks sex change operation is something that should be barred to anyone under 25)
but equivalent medical issues where this does come up not infrequently
- use of contraceptive pill
- adolescent wanting medical Hx kept confidential from parents

(and a less frequent extreme one)
- blood transfusion where parents are jehovah witness but child is having life threatening trauma needing blood, medical can get urgent guardianship order to administer blood against the wishes of parents to save life of child who has not had opportunity to choose if they want to follow JW beliefs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top