- Banned
- #226
This from the guy with a thousand aliases. Pontificate some more.For those wanting to know the content of the PM's.
I suggested Clay get a purpose in life, right now it revolves around "trying to out me"
Pathetic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

This from the guy with a thousand aliases. Pontificate some more.For those wanting to know the content of the PM's.
I suggested Clay get a purpose in life, right now it revolves around "trying to out me"
Pathetic.
Translation - I've been shown up as a fool.
How is it the fairest when the players and clubs have next to no say in where they play? Where would Jesse Hogan rather play? You can guarantee it would be anyone but Melbourne, and he'd probably prefer to play in WA.The AFL is by far, the best administered game in Australia and a leading figure in regards to maintaining fairness anywhere in the world.
Take your hand of it.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Age are reporting that Melbourne picks 3 and 13 to GWS for Hogan and pick 20 is close to being finalised
The Age are reporting that Melbourne picks 3 and 13 to GWS for Hogan and pick 20 is close to being finalised
Not sure why #13 and #20 would be involved considering GWS accepted #2 for the first pick in the mini draft.
How is it the fairest when the players and clubs have next to no say in where they play? Where would Jesse Hogan rather play? You can guarantee it would be anyone but Melbourne, and he'd probably prefer to play in WA.
Maybe it was part 2 of a dodgy deal whereby GWS didn't nominate Viney, letting him fall to the demons for 26
You guys are hilarious. A high draft pick was always going to get Hogan and we were never ever a chance. Melbourne aren't over paying and GWS are just doing the best by their club.
The Age are reporting that Melbourne picks 3 and 13 to GWS for Hogan and pick 20 is close to being finalised
On the bright side I guess that means we'll be keeping Moller then.
Fairness is relative. If the AFL system was ever tested in court under restraint of trade it would fail every single time. It's only because the players union buys in that it is never tested.And I'd rather be a Hollywood star. Come on Clay, it's an accepted fact that if players want to play professional sports that utilize a draft system then you go where you are drafted. That is fair otherwise the bigger market teams would get all the players all the time.
FA and trading is what then balances that out when a player/club is not getting what they want.
Make no mistake... that club will be a monster in four or five years.

What about GC?? They are not doing too badly at stockpiling some rare talent themselves.
The restraint of trade was even worse before FA and that same argument can be applied to every league that uses a draft. Small price to pay to be a professional athlete. All this boohoo,homesick and I want to play for my favourite club stuff is childish nonsense, none of this happens in other countries.Fairness is relative. If the AFL system was ever tested in court under restraint of trade it would fail every single time. It's only because the players union buys in that it is never tested.
Yes they have. Traded Pick 12 for Pick 24,43 and Tom Lee.I've just heard that Saints have done a pre-list trade with GWS to secure Tom Lee (unconfirmed).
Umm, yes it does. It even happens in Australia. The NRL has no draft. Neither does Super Rugby. For rugby league it was tested in court and found to be a restraint of trade. Players go where they can be paid the most.The restraint of trade was even worse before FA and that same argument can be applied to every league that uses a draft. Small price to pay to be a professional athlete. All this boohoo,homesick and I want to play for my favourite club stuff is childish nonsense, none of this happens in other countries.


