Judd or Buckley

[DVD Player]

Has Judd, or will he by the end of his career, surpass Buckley as a player?

 

[PieEyedLad]

Buckley's been the best Collingwood player over the last 20 odd years.

Even in a heavy loss, or in seasons that we didn't go so well, you look at Buckley's stats in games and see 25 odd touches, 6 tackles, 8 marks and 3 or so goals and you just have to admire him as a footballer, no one could ever question his endeavor and what he always tried to do to get his team over the line.

Judd's no slouch though, but I think Buckley has been the greater footballer. He could easily overtake him by the end of his career though.

 

[Donakebab]

Buckley, but Judd isn't far off. No vote.

 

[Burzum]

Judd..

 

[richoatthedisco]

Judd, hands and heels.

 

[the distributer]

id say buckley averaged more touches, did more with the touches, better skills, better mark, better goal kicker, stronger, tougher, better leader, both are/were very good one on one players.

judds quicker, more evassive, better line breaker.

buckley by a fair way.

 

[Hodgepodge]

Buckley was a poor shot at goal for some reason. Amazing that he kicked as many goals as he did.

 

[Kaladin Stormblessed]

Judd's already past him and got at least three more years to extend the gap.

 

[Hodgepodge]

Judd's already past him and got at least three more years to extend the gap.

Statistically Nathan's pulling further ahead every year.

Judd's goal average was an impressive 1.3 goals at West Coast. It's now slipped to 0.9 and will probably go down to 0.7 by career's end.

http://finalsiren.com/PlayerCompare...dd&PlayerName3=&PlayerName4=&SelectedPlayers=

 

[DO IT TO IT]

judd surpassed buckley 5 years ago, he's just widening the gap now

 

["The Roar Is Back"]

Buckley by a very significant margin !!

 

[daicos21]

Judd is more exciting with his abillity to accelarate away from an opponent but Buckley's disposal was 3 classes above. If it is quarterback/playmaker type of midfielder that you want, then Bucks hands down.

 

[jonbe54]

Judd is more exciting with his abillity to accelarate away from an opponent but Buckley's disposal was 3 classes above. If it is quarterback/playmaker type of midfielder that you want, then Bucks hands down.

If you want lace out disposal to leading forward up to 60M then bucks

If you want a flashy quick 3 step breakaway and an errant 30M pass then of course go for Judd.

 

[Sin City]

Judd has not gone past Buckley but I think he is a strong chance to do so by the end of his career.

Buckley is too underrated on BigFooty.

 

[barmyarmy]

id say buckley averaged more touches, did more with the touches, better skills, better mark, better goal kicker, stronger, tougher, better leader, both are/were very good one on one players.

judds quicker, more evassive, better line breaker.

buckley by a fair way.

buckley was not a tough footballer more an outside player who finished off other's good work.....as where judd is the best of both worlds chalk and cheese when comes to tougher and stronger

 

[Kipz]

buckley was not a tough footballer more an outside player who finished off other's good work.....as where judd is the best of both worlds chalk and cheese when comes to tougher and stronger

See the post above you, moran

 

[Eastern Rangers]

Judd has not gone past Buckley but I think he is a strong chance to do so by the end of his career.

Buckley is too underrated on BigFooty.

Judd's career has reached greater heights than Buckleys and his best football has been better than Buckleys for a greater period.

Two Brownlows at two clubs (should have had more), a Premiership and a Norm Smith that he clearly deserved.

 

[The OBSTacle]

Judd, just.

 

[Adelaide Hawk]

Buckley easily. A far superior player to judd.

 

[.Shotties.]

Judd's career has reached greater heights than Buckleys and his best football has been better than Buckleys for a greater period.

Two Brownlows at two clubs (should have had more), a Premiership and a Norm Smith that he clearly deserved.

Jesus Christ. LRT clearly deserved that medal. Every time I rewatch that game I'm more and more mystified as to why he didn't.

 

[the distributer]

buckley was not a tough footballer more an outside player who finished off other's good work.....as where judd is the best of both worlds chalk and cheese when comes to tougher and stronger

I honestly hope for your sake that you're trolling, possibly the stupidest comment ive heard, if you didnt see much of the man play just say so son.

 

[the distributer]

Judd's career has reached greater heights than Buckleys and his best football has been better than Buckleys for a greater period.

Two Brownlows at two clubs (should have had more), a Premiership and a Norm Smith that he clearly deserved.

he also won a brownlow he clearly didnt deserve, buckley was unlucky brownlow night on more than on occassion, also has a norm smith (in a losing team), remember, buckleys very best form was when he was 28+, was still a star before hand though, judd will need to not only keep up his current form but improve it in coming years to compare to buckley.

 

[bluepride]

also has a norm smith (in a losing team),

As did Judd.

 

[Stormers]

Judd pretty comfortably for mine

 

[the distributer]

both champions, no doubting that, ive always stated judds best was better, i reckon judds best was better than anyone ive seen TBH, but injury has taken its toll, OP isnt easy to get over and he's done a brilliant job at the blues considering, isnt as good as he was but we still see camios from the man, they only last for a half or so now days though, who knows, he could keep improving, still a young man really but if he were to retire today buckley would have to be in front, buckley was a resiliant bugger, hardly ever injured and had longevity at a very high standard.

footskills are starting to hurt judd a tad, i blame the OP for that, he used to have very good disposal, if he can improve that and lenghen his camios he'll become the best player in the comp again IMO.