We scored a goal approximately 1 in 8 forward 50 entries yesterday, whereas Collingwood scored 1 in every 3.4 entries. Strange that we can generate 54 inside 50s and still get flogged by 90 points. Something is not working.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We scored a goal approximately 1 in 8 forward 50 entries yesterday, whereas Collingwood scored 1 in every 3.4 entries. Strange that we can generate 54 inside 50s and still get flogged by 90 points. Something is not working.
We missed 8 absoloute sitters with boomer missing 2 as well.
Edit. Ttoes wasnt the best 2 hours ai. I hope they make the players watch it 7 times before Fremantle.
It's character building as a supporter so I can only imagine what it'd do for the players. It's interesting watching it without the gameday emotion. Prior to junktime we were better than I first thought live. We had a real crack at them but completely undid any good work through the moments you mention and the goals we gifted them from primary school kiddy mistakes with our disposal.
One thing I wouldn't do, having assessed the game again, is make a whole raft of changes. One or two maybe, but that's all. I'd put it back onto the group. "Fix this or **** off! The ball's in your court boys. Deliver!"
We need a big guy at FF. On the break, that is when the Fb shits himself, period. Imagine a whole 50 open for Petrie to lead into, I would be banking on him then. This is where Warren is missed, he gut runs around and can get into space that Edwards and co just don't have the will to get into.
Yeah, baffling why Petrie was never allowed any time in the goalsquare.
Dawes is a good example of what's needed - he is not a particularly good mark or anything special, but he has size, and doesn't mind using it.
Stop making sense and get back to posting nicknames and inside jokes. :stern lookI equate kicking for goal like catching in cricket. You just gotta practice it over & over again so that it becomes instinctive. Because it's instinctive acts/thoughts that cope best with pressure.
The problem with kicking for goal from set shots or taking skied catches in cricket is that you have time to think about the process & if you dont have a rock-solid process that works for you 100's of times a week at training, you are doomed.
And like a team that has the dropsy's in cricket, poor kicking for goal is contagious.
And its instincts that a sportsman will always revert to under pressure. Remember this - Steffi Graf was a great baseline tennis player but useless up at the net. She then apparently `practiced' her volleying to improve that part of her game. In matches where she was cruising, she'd come to the net occasionally. But in tight, pressure situations, she would NEVER approach the net because she just was not comfortable there - her instincts told her to stay back at the baseline. It takes a hell of a lot of practice to make something become instinctive - not just a token gesture half hour here & there. 1000's of repetitions under match-like conditions (which can be difficult to simulate obviously) are necessary to make something become instinctive.
Apparently in this era of professionalism, hours spent practising kicking for goal is not as important as sprint recovery, endurance, rehab etc. Which baffles me because in the end, there's no point generating shots for goal if they are not converted. I think coaches just hope that their players are good enough to convert.
Stop making sense and get back to posting nicknames and inside jokes. :stern look
Yeah thanks for that Onip.Patrick Swayze = The Land.