- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,548
- 52,865
- AFL Club
- GWS
Who is proposing she has to?Her opinions are odious, but if she doesn't want to fly QANTAS nobody can make her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who is proposing she has to?Her opinions are odious, but if she doesn't want to fly QANTAS nobody can make her.
Some of it probably stems from respecting older generations, parents, grandparents etc opinions or just respect in general even if their opinions are from a different era of innocence and ignorance.It would be very hard pressed to find a credible argument against gay marriage.
Some religious folk just like to cling on to traditional definitions of certain things e.g. marriage between man and woman, can't eat pork because pigs are dirty, only eat seafood on Good Friday etc.
That's debatable. At least 40% of the country would vote no if a plebiscite was held. Because Labor and The Greens are against a plebiscite, that is a clue in itself that they are scared that a plebiscite on gay marriage would fail. Btw, if given the chance, I will vote yes.
What if you have gay parents?Much like parts of Asia, the respect of parents isn't always a bad thing.
The opposite we see playing out here, where certain kidds must've been raised under a rock or by terrible parents and carry a massive chip and disrespect through life.
Rubbish, it would easily pass because the majority of people either support it or don't care at all and just want it over with. The ALP and Greens oppose the plebiscite because they don't really care about the issue, they just want the credit for introducing it.That's debatable. At least 40% of the country would vote no if a plebiscite was held. Because Labor and The Greens are against a plebiscite, that is a clue in itself that they are scared that a plebiscite on gay marriage would fail. Btw, if given the chance, I will vote yes.
She hasn't called for any violence, she has just expressed an opinion. The Left needs to accept that people have free will and are allowed not to mindlessly follow their view.Probably the greatest tennis player ever, but her same sex relationships and marriage equality views are based on religious bigotry which has its origins in a highly superstitious, fearful of the unknown, less educated and ill informed era.
Nobody has said she can't express her point of view. But others are free to point out her opinion is bigoted.She hasn't called for any violence, she has just expressed an opinion. The Left needs to accept that people have free will and are allowed not to mindlessly follow their view.
They certainly can but you can't punish someone by removing her name from a venue for expressing an opinion.Nobody has said she can't express her point of view. But others are free to point out her opinion is bigoted.
Yes; you can.They certainly can but you can't punish someone by removing her name from a venue for expressing an opinion.
Why not.What if you have gay parents?
She has been spouting homophobic Christian crap for over a decade yet why are we hearing about name changes now.
What if you have gay parents?
Originally posted in thread from 2012 but would do better as a new thread: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...nis-not-if-margaret-court-has-her-way.902849/
She is entitled to her opinion, she also has to cop the backlash by making her opinion public.
But she is still entitled to think for herself and form her own views whether we agree or not. It doesn't make her a bad person by having her own opinion.
Bradman's politics have at times come close to being a front in the culture wars, but nobody suggested his name be removed from anything.
Her opinions are odious, but if she doesn't want to fly QANTAS nobody can make her.
I didn't say she had RR. Being gay is a completely natural occurrence in our species, I don't know why people get so fascinated and offended by what consenting sound of mind adults do with and to each others bodies.She hasn't called for any violence, she has just expressed an opinion. The Left needs to accept that people have free will and are allowed not to mindlessly follow their view.
What if you have gay parents?
AgreeYou can't take her name off court, it's not as if she'd called for mass executions of NTTAWWTs. She's still an amazing tennis player with an incredible record, she's just a silly old bugger as well.
Its actually a very interesting question.Its not debateable. Every recent poll has put support at close to 70%.
http://www.afr.com/news/politics/el...es-in-gay-marriage-plebiscite-20160701-gpwg3z
Yes would win in a landslide. We've been over this countless times as to why Labor/Greens oppose a plebiscite, nothing to do with your fantasy about SSM being knocked back.
Labor will simply legislate for it when next in government. No need for a plebiscite unless its a referendum to change the Constitution.
Lets take her name off the court for being against something that is currently against the law? I honestly dont understand.You can't take her name off court, it's not as if she'd called for mass executions of NTTAWWTs. She's still an amazing tennis player with an incredible record, she's just a silly old bugger as well.
In defence of Gough he didn't say she should have her name taken off the court. He said the opposite actually. I can't believe that I am defending him!Lets take her name off the court for being against something that is currently against the law? I honestly dont understand.
How dare she have the same view as the law of Australia.