The problem with discussing any trade value is that next year's planning is completely up in the air for everyone.
What will list sizes be? If they are reduced how many picks must be used in the draft?
Like everything else being different in 2020, so will usual "trade value".
Us Tiger fans seem to assume that we will grab Maurice Rioli Jnr with our last (third?) pick. He doesn't appear to be on any draft watchers radar at all, so any shitty pick should do.
We have a tall defender in our academy, but basically no reports on how he's progressed this year and no idea if he's actually in our planning or not.
So, given Rance is probably our only retiree and we have very few delisting candidates, chances are we only actually use 1 or 2 "live" picks. Other clubs probably similar, so could be everyone trying to trade out some picks this year for futures.
Tigers currently have picks 17, 31, 53. Maybe trade Broad to GC for pick 34, then trade 31 & 34 to Norf for pick 25 since they need to replace 8 or so of their 11 delistings?
What will list sizes be? If they are reduced how many picks must be used in the draft?
Like everything else being different in 2020, so will usual "trade value".
Us Tiger fans seem to assume that we will grab Maurice Rioli Jnr with our last (third?) pick. He doesn't appear to be on any draft watchers radar at all, so any shitty pick should do.
We have a tall defender in our academy, but basically no reports on how he's progressed this year and no idea if he's actually in our planning or not.
So, given Rance is probably our only retiree and we have very few delisting candidates, chances are we only actually use 1 or 2 "live" picks. Other clubs probably similar, so could be everyone trying to trade out some picks this year for futures.
Tigers currently have picks 17, 31, 53. Maybe trade Broad to GC for pick 34, then trade 31 & 34 to Norf for pick 25 since they need to replace 8 or so of their 11 delistings?





