News Non-Crows AFLW 2023

Remove this Banner Ad

The Hawks and Bombers also had more development by playing in the VFLW, so it's not surprising that Port were the second worst team in the comp this year even if, on paper, they had more talent. A mixture of being green as well as Phillips being cooked contributed to that.
 
The top pick in the draft this year is a mad Crows fan as well apparently despite being in Ports academy lol.
Wonder what would happen if she requested a trade to the Crows. Would the AFL block it or just force us to pay overs. Back in the early days, players were moving within Victoria and getting to their club of choice for very little. Brianna Davey moved from Carlton to Collingwood for a 1st, 2nd and 3rd rounder and late pick swaps. She was their best player, but she was moving from a grand final team to a weaker team.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The top pick in the draft this year is a mad Crows fan as well apparently despite being in Ports academy lol.
If rumours are to be believed the Draft is going to be different before next season, due to the 2 seasons in one year it’s going to be a 19th year and over draft, so basically only a top up draft.

If you were alluding to Lauren Young in your post she still isn’t draft eligible until before the 2024 AFLW season.

Will be interesting how the trading period will work if any players want to leave expansion sides, there was a clause put in prior to last year’s signing/trading period that expansion teams could not sign 2021 draftees from the other 14 teams, I wonder if they’ll sneak in a clause that teams can not trade for expansion team signings/draftees in this next trading period. I can imagine they would not want a Hannah Ewings trying to get to her rightful home at the Crows straight away.
 
The Hawks and Bombers also had more development by playing in the VFLW, so it's not surprising that Port were the second worst team in the comp this year even if, on paper, they had more talent. A mixture of being green as well as Phillips being cooked contributed to that.
Port had that in the SAAFL/AdFL from 2010 (The PAFC/PAMFC merger also merged with the PAWFC) but they scuttled the team after 2018.

No sympathy for them when they complain about Essendon/Hawthorn having the leg up. They had it too, but decided to pull out.
 
--Vs Top 4Vs Top 8Vs Bottom 10
1​
Brisbane2-14-15-0
2​
Melbourne1-13-16-0
3​
Adelaide1-24-24-0
4​
Richmond1-11-1-26-0
5​
Geelong1-12-35-0
6​
Collingwood0-21-36-0
7​
Western Bulldogs0-10-37-0
8​
North Melbourne0-1-33-1-33-0
9​
Gold Coast0-30-45-1
10​
Essendon0-30-54-1
11​
Greater Western Sydney0-30-54-1
12​
Fremantle0-30-63-1-0
13​
St Kilda0-20-53-2
14​
Carlton0-20-42-2-2
15​
Hawthorn0-20-13-4
16​
West Coast0-20-42-6
17​
Port Adelaide0-10-31-1-5
18​
Sydney0-00-30-7

--
1​
2​
3​
4​
5​
6​
7​
8​
9​
10​
11​
12​
13​
14​
15​
16​
17​
18​
1​
Brisbane-WWL-W-WWWWW--W---
2​
MelbourneL-W---WWWW-WWW-W--
3​
AdelaideLLWWW-W--WWW---W-
4​
RichmondW-L-L--DWWW--WWW--
5​
Geelong--LW-LWL-W-WW--W-W
6​
CollingwoodL-L-W--L-WWWWW---W
7​
Western Bulldogs-L--L--L--WWWWWWW-
8​
North MelbourneLLLDWWW-W-------WW
9​
Gold CoastLL-L---L--L-WW-WWW
10​
EssendonLL-LLL-------LWWWW
11​
Greater Western SydneyL-LL-LL-W----WWL-W
12​
FremantleLLL-LLL------DWW-W
13​
St Kilda-LL-LLL-L----LW-WW
14​
Carlton-L-L-LL-LWLDW---D-
15​
HawthornL--L--L--LLLL--WWW
16​
West Coast-L-LL-L-LLWL--L-W-
17​
Port Adelaide--L---LLLL--LDLL-W
18​
Sydney----LL-LLLLLL-L-L-
 
I'd say, looking at results you'd go

1. Brisbane
2. Melbourne
3. Adelaide
4. Richmond
5. North Melbourne
6. Geelong
7. Collingwood
8. Western Bulldogs
9. Gold Coast
10. Greater Western Sydney
11. Carlton
12. Fremantle
13. Essendon
14. St Kilda
15. West Coast
16. Hawthorn
17. Port Adelaide
18. Sydney

Pretty much spot on. Just a few minor tweaks here and there.
 
So did Port really have the best crowds this season?
Yes

You could argue to take away their outlier due to a unique situation.
Which if you did in isolation, they drop from #1 to #4

But if you're taking away Port's outlier, you must also take Sydney and Essendon's outliers (first ever home game) and Melbourne's (double header with mens final)

You do all these and it still ends up

Port Power
13022​
3255.5​
Essendon
12248​
3062​
Sydney
10602​
2650.5​
Adelaide
12699​
2539.8​
West Coast
12415​
2483​
Geelong
12276​
2455.2​
Carlton
10484​
2096.8​
Collingwood
9771​
1954.2​
Brisbane
9442​
1888.4​
St Kilda
9251​
1850.2​
North Melbourne
9146​
1829.2​
Hawthorn
9128​
1825.6​
Richmond
8535​
1707​
Western Bulldogs
8450​
1690​
Greater Western Sydney
7728​
1545.6​
Fremantle
7076​
1415.2​
Melbourne
5155​
1288.75​
Gold Coast
5083​
1016.6​

Though, if you're taking Essendons/Sydneys outliers of first game, you could then argue to take Port's first HOME game too, but that was rd 2. But all that does is drop them from 1st to 3rd (2,552)

Essendon
12248​
3062​
Sydney
10602​
2650.5​
Port Power
7655​
2551.667​
Adelaide
12699​
2539.8​
West Coast
12415​
2483​
Geelong
12276​
2455.2​
Carlton
10484​
2096.8​
Collingwood
9771​
1954.2​
Brisbane
9442​
1888.4​
St Kilda
9251​
1850.2​
North Melbourne
9146​
1829.2​
Hawthorn
9128​
1825.6​
Richmond
8535​
1707​
Western Bulldogs
8450​
1690​
Greater Western Sydney
7728​
1545.6​
Fremantle
7076​
1415.2​
Melbourne
5155​
1288.75​
Gold Coast
5083​
1016.6​
 
Wonder if it’s a deliberate plan by Geelong and their coaching staff that when they play a top 8 team they decide they are just going to play the most ugly style of football to just turn it into an utter slugfest scrap.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wonder if it’s a deliberate plan by Geelong and their coaching staff that when they play a top 8 team they decide they are just going to play the most ugly style of football to just turn it into an utter slugfest scrap.
Also their forward line efficiency made the Crows’ look amazing.

Roos with the most undeserved finals win 😂
 
If I've learnt anything over the last 6 years

GFs in Melbourne are a disaster.

half the next smallest (and that (2nd smallest) was played 66km away from the their home ground)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top