Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Non-Essendon Thread IX

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Can't you let me feel like a football genius for a minute?
Nah, youre not a mod anymore. Back with us plebs now.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I'm really enjoying this contest. I don't have any interest in who wins though, so maybe that's enhancing my enjoyment of the match.
 
Is it me or does hawthorn play like we do at etihad? our short kicking game dosnt work as well at etihad compared to the g and we get troubled my fast sides

game is also showing that carlton are a decent side
 
imick has darlton playing a sustainable brnd of footy. doht think they have enough cattle yet, but they are on the right track.
On the piss early mate? :p
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Kruezer is a poor ruckman. He's good below his knees, yes, but a ruckman's first job is to win hitouts. He does that once every 6 games
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Carlton are getting F'd in the A by the umpires tonight.

I think everyone watching can see it, no matter what your feelings on carlton are. Between the free kicks and carltons own errors they were never going to win
 
He had to change the way they were playing they were figured out, he had get the team to evolve, there is a reason even mick malthouse has changed his "signature" game style at Carlton (1 doesn't have the cattle and 2 its not effective in today's footy)

Id argue that what he is doing is better than sitting around and doing nothing hoping it would get better. Then again you could argue that LT is meant to be player driven, not forced upon a group.
Just playing devils advocate, im not necessarily for or against leading teams but i am very much of the belief that the biggest thing in footy is mindset/attitude.


If LT helps create a premiership winning mindset then go for it. Best thing bucks is doing atm is being proactive, of course if he is forcing it on the players then that could cause more harm




With respect so much of what you've said, which mirrors a lot of what has been said, is circular and/or self-fulfilling and assumes that Malthouse would not have evolved (which is unlikely given that the experience at Carlton already confirms that he has).

To look at it a different way, is there really a need to do any of this or are they doing this because they have screwed up what they had which makes it all "necessary"?
 
So do the football scribes blame Hawthorn's total lack of run in the first half on the presence of Bailey or did Hawthorn win because they players on the ground pulled their fingers out. I can see all the talk being about Hawthorn being too tall. Funnily enough their talls were the difference.
 
With respect so much of what you've said, which a lot of what has been said, is circular and/or self-fulfilling and assumes that Malthouse would not have evolved (which is unlikely given that the experience at Carlton already confirms that he has).

To look at it a different way, is there really a need to do any of this or are they doing this because they have screwed up what they had which makes it all "necessary"?

Yeah true, i guess there wouldn't be the need to do it if they hadn't have stuffed it up to begin with.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom