Remove this Banner Ad

Off and running towards 2004

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

blackdiamond

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Dec 7, 2000
Posts
8,730
Reaction score
1,208
Location
Melbourne, Victoria
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
New Orleans Saints, Detroit Tigers
courtesy of www.portadelaidefc.com.au

Off and running towards 2004

126554aq.jpg


Fitness machine Kane Cornes led a pack of 13 players through the Power’s first training session of the 2004 pre-season on Wednesday morning.

The Power’s ten players with less than four years AFL experience were required back at pre-season training on Wednesday and were joined by Adam Kingsley, Brendon Lade and Damien Hardwick, who chose to have a run with the youngsters. Players with four or more years AFL experience aren’t required back from holidays until next Wednesday (19 Nov).

The first session, which lasted around 45 minutes, included an 18-minute run in North Adelaide and it was Cornes who set the pace, as he regularly has in recent years.

“We had seven weeks off and I really enjoyed it, we had the footy trip to Hawaii which was great, we got a lot of sun over there. (But) I think if it (the break) was any longer you’d be itching to get back.”

Cornes nominated a couple of stand-out performers from the session and was encouraged by what he saw of Kingsley, who is yet to be offered a contract for Season 2004.

“There were a few good performances, I think Dom Cassisi, Damon White and Stephen Gilham came back in pretty good shape and it should set them up for a big year,” he said.

“If (Kingsley) does get his chance, he really deserves it. I know he has been doing a ton of work which is really good and he looks pretty slim. So if he does get that chance I’m sure he’ll grab it with both hands so I’d like to see him get another crack.”

Fitness coach Andrew Russell said Kingsley, the 1998 John Cahill Medal winner, had done everything asked of him since the end of the season when the club had indicated it may delist him.

“I think you can see Adam has completely changed body shape and he’s worked pretty hard,” Russell said on Wednesday.

“The last month he has had a pretty heavy program that he has been running and I’m reasonably happy with where he is at. Where he ends up is yet to be determined but he is in line at the moment and is showing that he has done the work we wanted him to do.”

The Power will submit a second (but not final) list for 2004 to the AFL this Friday.

Russell, who is entering his fourth year in charge of the Power’s fitness program, said he wasn’t planning any major changes to his pre-season program but pinpointed an area he wanted to improve on from last season.

“I’ve been through the program many times and thought about where I can change it and we don’t need to make major changes. We’re really just bringing in the best parts of the program from the last three years,” he said.

“We had some soft tissue injuries going into the start of last season and that’s an area we need to improve. During the season we had a pretty good program and we thought it ran pretty well.

“Certainly the coaches always want the players to be fitter and there were certain players unavailable in finals that they would have liked but we don’t feel we need a major overhaul in that area.

“Last year the issue was with the players who came back injured and missed the first phase of training prior to Christmas. (On returning) the workload was too high too quick so it’s monitoring loads really and having a fractionally more individualised approach to each player.”

Russell said Wednesday’s session was “an easy run just to let me know where they’re at” and he wasn’t surprised by what he saw.

On the eye-catching performance of Cornes, Russell said Kane had to make sure he didn’t do too much work.

“I love those guys like Kane Cornes who you have to pull back all the time and I’d much rather have 40 Kane Corneses than 40 players who weren’t motivated,” he said.

“Kane’s learned a lot and he now understands that he has to pull back at times and he’s learning about his body all the time.”

Russell said the Power players would do between eight and 12 sessions per week during pre-season depending on the player and their needs.

“Some players don’t need to do quite as much work as others. An example might be Gavin Wanganeen, last year he only did 70 to 75 percent of the pre-season but he did it consistently and he trained almost every day and he didn’t have too many breaks in his program,” he said.

“That’s really the key that players don’t have major breaks in their pre-season even if they don’t do quite the work load that others do. The stats suggest that if you do a consistent training program and don’t break down at all then you’ll have a good year.”
 
Originally posted by Scott
“There were a few good performances, I think Dom Cassisi, Damon White and Stephen Gilham came back in pretty good shape and it should set them up for a big year,” he said.
I certainly bloody hope so. Its crunch year for White and Cassisi....there's room in the side for both if they're good enough. Heck, Gilham too.
 
Sadly it looks like Kingers is a dead set certainty to stay on the list now, I wish the players would stop talking him up, next you will know he'll be named joint Vice Captain with Tredders.

Even if Adam has completely changed his body as Andrew Russell states I still don't see how this is going to change his high turnover and bombscare rate. If he is fitter it probably just means he will get more of the ball and thus more of what we hate.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

being a bit harsh on kinga i rekon....i still rekon he will be good for the team..experience is valuable, and he has a good shot for goal...

i still rekon he will be useful
 
Originally posted by mik
being a bit harsh on kinga i rekon....i still rekon he will be good for the team..experience is valuable, and he has a good shot for goal...

i still rekon he will be useful

Not harsh at all, quite light actually.

Alan Scott once made the statement that we will never win a premiership with Mark Williams at the helm, what he should have said is we will never win a premiership with Adam Kingsley in the side.

God help Kingers if I draft him! :D
 
Hardwick

Hardwick has rocked up early this year as he knows he is going to stuggle to make the side as the team starts looking to the future. I think it will be the last year we see Hardwick, in the Port Strip, so not be surprised if he plays a few games in the SANFL.
 
Re: Hardwick

Originally posted by crazy_big_al
Hardwick has rocked up early this year as he knows he is going to stuggle to make the side as the team starts looking to the future.

Id love to beleive your line about looking to the future but i cant just see it happening. Recalling Kingsley makes me believe it will be same old same old this year with the same players getting a go, the same players being screwed around and no young players given a chance to shine.

As for Hardwick, he was in our top 2 players in the finals this year and i reckon he still has quite a bit to give to the team. His year wasnt as bad last year as people made out, he had a bad 3-4 week period but the rest of the time he was his usual solid self.


With Kingsley....all the media outlets seem to be having orgasms over his fitness. His fitness has never been a problem to me. His general skills, thinking, decision making, constantly putting teammates under extreme pressure, lack of defensive skills, continuous loss of opponent and wasting of the ball has been a problem for me. He can be fit as a bloody marathon runner but if he is still the same kingsley with the same damn faults then what is the point?
 
Originally posted by Russian
Did I hear somewhere that Heath Hopwood was training or has been invited to train?

Yeah i think so. I dont mind Hopwood. I think hes a definate player and i was quite keen on drafting him at the end of 2000.
 
So he's shed 4kg. Losing weight won't necessarily make him a better player.

I think it's fairly obvious he's going to be kept on now, so bye bye Wade.

*Sigh* Prove me wrong Chocco.. prove me wrong.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Probably Wade will be rookie listed. I doubt there's any other interested parties.
 
Re: Re: Hardwick

Originally posted by Macca19
Id love to beleive your line about looking to the future but i cant just see it happening. Recalling Kingsley makes me believe it will be same old same old this year with the same players getting a go, the same players being screwed around and no young players given a chance to shine.

I like to think of next year as the no-lose year. We either win a premiership or - catastrophic circumstances notwithstanding - the old conservative empire tumbles down and we introduce a breath of fresh air to the club.

I guess the other thing to consider is the last time Choco was caught in a corner (early 2000) he did abandon the complex game plans and introduced youth (Carry was brought in, even Koula got a game in his first season) to turn things around.
 
Re: Re: Hardwick

Originally posted by Macca19
Id love to beleive your line about looking to the future but i cant just see it happening. Recalling Kingsley makes me believe it will be same old same old this year with the same players getting a go, the same players being screwed around and no young players given a chance to shine.

As for Hardwick, he was in our top 2 players in the finals this year and i reckon he still has quite a bit to give to the team. His year wasnt as bad last year as people made out, he had a bad 3-4 week period but the rest of the time he was his usual solid self.


With Kingsley....all the media outlets seem to be having orgasms over his fitness. His fitness has never been a problem to me. His general skills, thinking, decision making, constantly putting teammates under extreme pressure, lack of defensive skills, continuous loss of opponent and wasting of the ball has been a problem for me. He can be fit as a bloody marathon runner but if he is still the same kingsley with the same damn faults then what is the point?
Very good post Macca.
Hardwick IMO still has quite a bit to offer. He was never in the top couple of players, but is still in our best 18 and will be for a while.

In reality, there really is no real reason for delisting Kingsley and Paxman. We have quite a few places to draft new young players without delisting these two, and both would be good insurance value. Paco much more so than Kingsley.

HOWEVER

With Mark Williams as a coach if we had both Paxman and Kingsley on our list he would go for the soft option like he has always done and play them instead of giving young players a chance to develop, apart from the odd one or two that he has a soft spot for.

"Recalling Kingsley makes me believe it will be same old same old this year with the same players getting a go, the same players being screwed around and no young players given a chance to shine."
Unfortunately, it just cannot be put better than that. :(
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom