Of course we wouldNeither is Stephenson, it's his one slight flaw and they are the two players we will probably be picking from
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course we wouldNeither is Stephenson, it's his one slight flaw and they are the two players we will probably be picking from
Can change your vote to reflect your change in mind... just sayin
Perhaps we should have a vote to decide if we want to have a new poll.If you ran a new poll now you'd get a different result. The poll reflects the opinions of when it was started.
That's true. The more I watched of his highlights, the more effective his long kicking appeared, although I'd still question his shorter kicking.It's more his Kicking Action then the Actual Kick
The idea of honoring the number is not a bad one. Giving it to the highest draft pick however may not have been the best idea. Some seasons we don't even get to see then number out on the paddock.It does have a purpose, Presti gave up his spot in the granny and this was the way the club chose to remember him for that decision, but I think that it should be scrapped when Nick Daicos get drafted.
Can change your vote to reflect your change in mind... just sayin
That's true. The more I watched of his highlights, the more effective his long kicking appeared, although I'd still question his shorter kicking.
The idea of honoring the number is not a bad one. Giving it to the highest draft pick however may not have been the best idea. Some seasons we don't even get to see then number out on the paddock.
Since I shifted away from the idea of a key position i've pretty consistently liked Coffield for us.
Whose idea was the number 35 going to the first player selected? It is ridiculous and now we have a junior Daicos, the club should end it.
One of the worst ideas I've seen with absolutely no purpose.
I think Coffield is off our Radar now. Earliest he might go is 8 to Saints
He'll be a steal for someone.
So you think he is the Best Talent in the Draft?
No. But the best likely at 6 and considering other risks (Bonar and injury for e.g.) Unless Cerra falls.
Suspect Swooop is right and it’s who people want rather than who they think we’ll take/will be available.Going by the poll, Fogarty is the runaway winner for pick 6, yet as you imply, this is not reflected by the discussion. What's the point of a poll that so inaccurately reflects the feelings of posters? Three times more people voted for Fogarty than Naughton, and 6 times more for Fogarty than Cerra. Coffield is a clear number 2 in the poll, but not going by the comments. It's the last time I put any faith in a poll. It seems people just do something deliberately obtuse when they complete a poll.
What you like about Coffield over higher Rated Talents in Brayshaw,Naughton and Fogarty who else bee Linked to us?
Who is your avatar, I feel I know here from somewhere - she'd be a good pick up at 6The poll is more likely a greater reflection of who people hope we select than who we expect the club will take.
The discussion now in the thread is more focused on the latter.
I'm still hoping for Stephenson.
Just head to the Phantom draft board. You're not a closet luddite, are you?So is there a list of all the gurus phantom drafts and who do these gurus list at 6 and 38?
Be interesting too see and compare Friday night.
I'd say the first five picked will have a big bearing on who we pickI say North has a Big Say who be Available at our Pick
No not part of the tolpuddle martyrs eitherJust head to the Phantom draft board. You're not a closet luddite, are you?
swoop42 Looks like Judy GreerWho is your avatar, I feel I know here from somewhere - she'd be a good pick up at 6
(Joking ofcourse)