- Moderator
- #76
Monty knows best.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yes.
The idea of Dougal Howard is better than the reality. He's inconsistent, he makes dumb errors, poor at ground level, he's not a particularly good kick, his marking is hit and miss hence why he spoils as a first preference.
I was one of the few who was happy they moved him forward because to be frank he's just the tall Pittard.
All the 'he's unreliable, his marking is poor' etc comments are a bit rich when McKenzie has cost us several goals this year by dropping uncontested marks, one of which came just three days ago. Rose coloured glasses all round.
Did you watch the final yesterday mate?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Yes. One mark.
Dougal did it multiple times every week.
Saying Mckenzie hasnt been more reliable this year is just stubborness in the extreme.
Howard would get obliterated by Hawkins. I have fond memories of Hipwood kicking six on Howard last year.It is about Port not the Saints. It you cannot see the relevance of not having Dougal Howard to use against a player like Hawkins I will not waste my time debating the issue with you.
Against Port earlier this season, Josh Bruce had 1 kick, 1 mark and kicked 0.0.
Having said all that, he’d be handy against Brisbane, and if he thumps Dixon in 2 weeks then i’ll throw a tanty
I feel we need a fit Burton, he is more important than some think.It’s funny trades.
So St K also got Paddy, who has helped them make finals. But probably only has one more year, and there is a chance of injury (like last night).
Howard has been better than anyone else they had this year, and probably also has helped them make finals.
Doubt however, they will beat Richmond or us. So trade not a threat. Not sure St K will be a threat next year either.
We on the other hand, got Williams, who we are yet to see, but there is the potential that we have a small forward who can replace Robbie...
We also got points towards Mead, who we are yet to see, and possibly points towards Jones, who we are yet to see.
The sum of all of this is really a 2-12 year decision from now, with the club backing our current tall defenders and system - the best in the league in 2020 (and Hopefully 2021/2022).
I think the club thought Jack Watts still had a couple of years to go, and may not have traded Doogs if they knew Watts was done.
Still have prelim and Gf to go, have been lucky to escape any serious injuries back there, but I believe the club will look for some cheap cover this trade season. Maybe an almost retired player on a low salary rookie or 1-2 year contract, that costs us minimal draft points. Mostly to replace Watts and give Pasini more time to develop.
It’s still a yes to the trade for me. Doogs made a lot of mistakes, didn’t mark much footy, and was out of position a lot. We also increased our draft value for him, and got some use out of him.
Would not have had as good a year without McKenzie this year.
Very true but our lack of height down back is still an issue, our defense is missing a genuine tall.Dougal played his best game yesterday, sadly he will go missing next week.
we could debate trading him extensively, but history will show whether it was a mistake in the future,
Brisbane have some handy talls also.Yes true, if we do play St Kilda there is a bloke called Max King who played really well yesterday...does McKenzie play on him as well?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Maybe he's better coached.Mckenzie has shown consistency this year that Howard never looked like showing. Whether hes a better player or not doesnt matter. Mckenzie and his traits have fit our team better
Dangerfield says hi.Forget dropped marks, McKenzie also TAKES marks unlike Howard.
All the 'he's unreliable, his marking is poor' etc comments are a bit rich when McKenzie has cost us several goals this year by dropping uncontested marks, one of which came just three days ago. Rose coloured glasses all round.
The look on Ken's face when Stanley marked 20m out 1st qtr....... it was a gulp moment for me.It's the lack of a genuinely tall KPD rather than Dougal himself to me, I mean sure get rid of him but bring in a replacement at least.
I don't wanna say it but if we get in a tight final and the difference ends up a tall marking over our short people late in the game all our team defense knob polishing all year will be meaningless.
The quick centre clearance one kick deep in the forward line on the short ass GABBA with an undersized defense is nightmarish.The look on Ken's face when Stanley marked 20m out 1st qtr....... it was a gulp moment for me.