They are the Kane Kornes of ads…How ******* awful are the KFC ads
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
They are the Kane Kornes of ads…How ******* awful are the KFC ads
AFL Video Ump: "Rock 'n roll it. I can't decide between the book depository or the grassy knoll."As someone who has training in how to use cameras my mind still boggles at how the goal reviews turn into footage sent back from the moon in 1969 when they play it back frame by frame.
Kornes would have been well suited to a playing career at the Crows, and not just because of who his father is.
for those who do not have access - here's there main points.
Adelaide Crows must target Port Adelaide ruckman Peter Ladhams, says Kane Cornes
Port Adelaide’s Peter Ladhams is the man that can solve Adelaide’s ruck issues.
The Crows need to make an aggressive move and table a four-year, $2 million offer to secure his signature in this trade period.
Ladhams can be the player to solve the conundrum and his name has already been discussed among Adelaide’s list management committee.
He should be the No.1 big-man target to add depth to the depleted ruck division at West Lakes. Ladhams is only 22 and fits perfectly inside the demographic of Adelaide’s rebuilding playing group.
The biggest barrier blocking Adelaide from securing Ladhams this off-season is his contract status at Port Adelaide, which sees him committed to the club until the end of 2022.
After also failing to lure Collingwood big man Brodie Grundy home last year, the recruitment of Ladhams would help to ease the pain.
The Crows will welcome an influx of elite talent via this year’s draft that has the potential to fast-track their significant list overhaul.
The draft needs to be supported by an aggressive trading strategy and stealing Ladhams from its cross-town rival would be a major coup.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The same way Smith managing to get three warnings about not being in that ruck contest in the second.How did libba get away with that rugby throw ffs
******* umps
Have you not watched a Bulldogs game since the end of 2015?How did libba get away with that rugby throw ffs
******* umps
His highlights package after 2 games is pretty remarkable, fair play I say.Rankine looks very good and sooner or later will probably rip a game apart but the absolute jizzfest everywhere on BF is way over the top.
he spotlight on Rowell and rankine has drawn so much away from Anderson. Anderson has looked good and could easily be one of the best couple of players in the afl very soon
Living in Melbourne makes it easier to see the bias. I watch all the shows because it's all I've got and there is a bias to the expansion teams and the Victorian teams but the footy programs are nationally televised so there is room to cover opposition teams a bit more. I grew up with the MLB and NFL and whoever is hot in the power rankings gets a little more limelight. You seem to be content with the crumbs the league hands us. Establishing a power ranking ensures that the team at the top is scrutinised, but it also helps talented players get revolution and sponsorship. You see how picky the subject of the final being or of Victoria is. It'll be good for the game if it happens...Nah, it is obvious you dont watch any of these shows. They are not recaps of who won games ... they are all about newsworthy stories and dramas from the weekend, often off-field. Besides Robbies after-the-siren goal, there was absolutely nothing newsworthy about Ports win. Nothing! It was a nothing effort, marked mainly by missed goals and opportunities in the last 4 minutes. Other than a one liner "Port won," there was nothing worth talking about to their viewers. Any expectation otherwise is just being churlish IMO.
I do agree their content can be weighted to Vic sides, but they are Vic-based media shows, and their largest demograph would be Victorians, so that is understandable. Also they tend to crap on about some useless subjects, and their hosts are often driven by their own egos (hello Eddie). So it depends what mood I am in as to whether I watch or not.