Originally posted by Third Ring
To use your analogy, if you asked people about paying tax, a large majority would say they are happy to do so, as long as everyone is treated the same, with some concessions for the more needy. I will happily support someone in need of help.
However, most people will object to having to pay more than someone who 'unfairly' pays less or who gets more.
Show me someone who happily pays tax while Kerry Packer doesn't and while 3 generations of a family live off handouts down the beach.
The priority picks are too concessional.
The question was directed at Deej and his proclimations of never taking a handout.
Even if he went to the most prestigeous school in Australia it still gets govt grants and therefore he got handouts.
Tax Cuts are handouts. $7,000 to get a new home is a handout.
A new classroom for my kids school is a handout.
Reopening the rail link to Bairnsdale is a handout.
The list goes on. And the analogy is flawed.
If that is Deej's politics, well thats cool, but it isn't appropriate for a competition that wants to maximise revenue, and thats what the AFL's first priority is. And they are suceeding brilliantly in that respect.



