Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Qualifying Final Changes vs. Sydney

  • Thread starter Thread starter YelloMit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Just handed them the game IMO. That is if there isn't a late change. There is no spot for three rucks. Would prefer Mayne to go back and bring in De Boer or better still leave Crozier in.

Yes that is precicely what has just happened... Have some faith that the coaching staff actually know what they're doing. Obviously they have a plan, they havent just woken up this morning and said, 'yeah i think Griff needs a game, barely played all year'.

A lot of planning and strategies are currently in motion behind closed doors, there is quite obviously a reason for his inclusion i think.
 
Just handed them the game IMO. That is if there isn't a late change. There is no spot for three rucks. Would prefer Mayne to go back and bring in De Boer or better still leave Crozier in.
Buh?

There are 25 players selected. There will be one or two late changes
 
Or even Smith's first game where David Hale monstered him. Not too sure we'll be seeing left field choices like Mora and Smith in a Qual final.

I think you're being flattering to David Hale.
IIRC Tanner Smith should have received four free kicks for in the back from Hale ; Appalling umpiring.
 
Ross has played him back before, and maybe he's the most suited for the Johnson role.

He played one game in the backline which was unconvincing.

He's played three games in the forward line which have been very convincing, and delivered far more than Clarke would as a perma-forward.

Ibbotson has to take the Johnson role.
 
Yes that is precicely what has just happened... Have some faith that the coaching staff actually know what they're doing. Obviously they have a plan, they havent just woken up this morning and said, 'yeah i think Griff needs a game, barely played all year'.

A lot of planning and strategies are currently in motion behind closed doors, there is quite obviously a reason for his inclusion i think.
Just stating my opinion. I was quite confident in us winning this with Crozier/Suban/De Boer or even A.Pearce in there instead but not anymore. Griffin is a no.1 ruck only. He's never been capable of playing a number two. I'd obviously be more happy to be wrong though so hopefully I am.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I think you're being flattering to David Hale.
IIRC Tanner Smith should have received four free kicks for in the back from Hale ; Appalling umpiring.

Not at all Fred, let's not pretend he wouldn't cop worse treatment against the protected beings of the Sydney forward line.

I have no doubt he's gotten better strength wise in those sorts of contests but still it would be rough.
 
He played one game in the backline which was unconvincing.

He's played three games in the forward line which have been very convincing, and delivered far more than Clarke would as a perma-forward.

Ibbotson has to take the Johnson role.
You're probably right, but I'd say Taberner can be a lot more effective where ever he plays now that he has confidence.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Robbing our forward line is no way to win the game.
Sandi obviously in some doubt, so Griff is cover.
I agree with this. Sandi looked sore at the end of the port game. I'd say he will be given until the last moment to show that he's OK. If he is, Crozier in for Grif if dry, mdb in if wet.
 
I like the idea of DeBoer being in the mix. Another rainy day today in Syd, if this keeps up another strong bodied mid could be useful.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom