- Dec 18, 2007
- 10,382
- 18,171
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Doesn't look like Rachele was training. Not wearing footy boots and has a jacket on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
There are 8 rounds to go, he is currently on 292 games so add 8 and he gets to 300. If we qualify for finals, the finals game becomes his 300th if the club decides he misses the West Coast game.
Not sure what you are going on about - it is now a 23 game season, not 22.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Official changes are in
IN: Taylor
OUT: Murphy (omitted)
Wow, did not think there was the slightest hope of that happening. But again, Murphy delivered exactly what everyone would expect of him, why do we keep selecting him instead of giving a kid a crack.
More like the selection panel tied and gagged Nicks so he couldn’t pick him.Nicks when Murphy shows nothing for the 118th game in a row:
![]()
Hopefully Taylor gets a full game.
Any coach that isn't a moron would sub Smith but who knows what Nixxy will do...
If the coaches are to have any credibility they had to pull the trigger on bringing Taylor in.Wow, did not think there was the slightest hope of that happening. But again, Murphy delivered exactly what everyone would expect of him, why do we keep selecting him instead of giving a kid a crack.
Great mullet
Let's not get too hyperbolic.We have potentially self sabotaged our season by giving Murphy those two games against Gold Coast and Hawthorn where we lost by a goal.
I hope he is not sub and gets a chance at a decent roleIf the coaches are to have any credibility they had to pull the trigger on bringing Taylor in.
I can only hope last week was "He does well in the SANFL, let's see how he does in the AFL in the midfield" move with Murphy and they saw that the results do not translate at all.
Nicks is a moronWow, did not think there was the slightest hope of that happening. But again, Murphy delivered exactly what everyone would expect of him, why do we keep selecting him instead of giving a kid a crack.
Yeah don’t get too excited.Wow, did not think there was the slightest hope of that happening. But again, Murphy delivered exactly what everyone would expect of him, why do we keep selecting him instead of giving a kid a crack.
We limped Ricciuto to break Ben Hart's (then ) games record tally and arguably cost ourselves an elimination final win (Massie on Franklin not withstanding)
Roo was a complete liability in that final game - ended up with half dozen possessions? If that?
Please tell me Murphy is out of contract end of this season
Surely that's done for him
Congrats on getting 100+ AFL games but time is over
I was sure someone told me Murph has a contract for next year.He is, but we have a first and then about 3 third round picks. We’ve got Murphy, Tex, Crouch, Schoey, Burgess, Smith and Bond all out of contract. You’d think at least 2 are retained.
That's a relief!Official changes are in
IN: Taylor
OUT: Murphy (omitted)
It’s one of life’s mysteriesWow, did not think there was the slightest hope of that happening. But again, Murphy delivered exactly what everyone would expect of him, why do we keep selecting him instead of giving a kid a crack.
Pedlar v Taylor.Draper in for Smith and it's our best team
Nick Murray vs Jordon Butts discussion not withstanding. I think most would be happy with either?
Getting closer
If the coaches are to have any credibility they had to pull the trigger on bringing Taylor in.
I can only hope last week was "He does well in the SANFL, let's see how he does in the AFL in the midfield" move with Murphy and they saw that the results do not translate at all.
Let’s ignore our coaches depth chart for a moment (which has IMO had enough questionable-in-retrospect calls in past years to suggest it’s not perfect). Do you personally think Murphy plays the seventh fiddle forward role better than Taylor would? I’d argue that, at worst, their output is about equal. As you said before, there is such little difference between outputs for this role that it is essentially swapping deck chairs on the titanic.
Then why not give the role to a player with an even slightly better chance of improving and locking down a long-term career? There’s four years and 102 games difference between Taylor and Murphy. When their output is similarly low, you can’t ignore such glaring difference in potential and ceiling. Mind you, this also applies to Draper and (to a lesser extent) Pedlar. To reward SANFL form though I think Taylor deserves another crack.
McHenry says hilol, what a moron. What did he expect Murphy to have suddenly improved?