Rumour Rumors of cat player in big trouble

[callmeX]

St kilda https://stacksgoudkamp.com.au/media...ch-facing-historical-child-sex-abuse-charges/

‘Ross Lyon’s job is in jeopardy’

THINGS are going from bad to worse for Fremantle as the fallout from the Ross Lyon sexual harassment scandal continues.

www.news.com.au

 

[callmeX]

Can we settle down, as the kid deserves his time
And for time with strippers
Did carlton golfather dr edelstein marry his
Swann marry a dancer
And you perfect nerd keyboard warriors keep punching

 

[Daka]

Him name is suppressed . only Big footy posters know the name

That's not true on X his name was trending on social media, when it came known a lot of non bigfooty people use X or twitter whatever you want to call it.

 

[TheEscapeClub]

Absolute disgrace that he was in attendance.

I’m hoping this bloke is never seen representing Geelong again.

If he is, after 40 years of supporting the cats, I’m at the age where I’ll always love the club and watch from a distance but I will never tip any money into a club that supports a guy like the player mentioned.

So your following Geelong coincides with Gary Ablett Snr's Geelong career in it's entirety?

Interesting.

 

[TheEscapeClub]

publicise it by the fact if he was on the ground, I wouldn't of given him a spare second thought, why is he there??? hes unavailable to play and facing serious charges

I'll give you an example, I see him on the ground and I turn to my mate and inform him of whats going on, answer me this why is he out there?

By virtue of him being out there lets "footy nerds" talk about it more, secondly its not just footy nerds that know, most people that follow football with any sort of awareness knows, obviously the casual supporter doesnt but you are making it out thats its a small section of big footy that knows

Theres posts on twitter about it with 100k+ views on numerous posts

So you turned to your mate and violated the suppression order? Good work.

Go and enjoy the win.

 

[craffles]

That's not true on X his name was trending on social media, when it came known a lot of non bigfooty people use X or twitter whatever you want to call it.

And reddit, WhatsApp and messenger

 

[mighty_lions]

So you turned to your mate and violated the suppression order? Good work.

Go and enjoy the win.

Arrest me, let’s stop pretending no one knows

 

[takethepowerback]

So you turned to your mate and violated the suppression order? Good work.

Go and enjoy the win.

He isn't violating the suppression order by chatting to his mate. It's about publication/disclosing details in public domains/forums.

 

[rei154]

Can we settle down, as the kid deserves his time
And for time with strippers
Did carlton golfather dr edelstein marry his
Swann marry a dancer
And you perfect nerd keyboard warriors keep punching

Did you have a stroke while writing this?

 

[CatsDan]

Time to shut this one down admins . I think there’s too many baseless rumours thrown around

 

[mighty_lions]

Time to shut this one down admins . I think there’s too many baseless rumours thrown around

says a 1 day old account in a rumour thread

 

[RAPPA]

Time to shut this one down admins . I think there’s too many baseless rumours thrown around

I ageee. A Banner is brewing.

 

[craffles]

Time to shut this one down admins . I think there’s too many baseless rumours thrown around

Is that you Pat?

 

[rye]

You clearly know nothing about spurious allegations. As a man you're right in the box seat for it to happen to.

this just isnt true and is a pretty poor post. reads like mgtow crap.

if there was nothing to whatever the accused had done it would not have gotten as far as it has.

even if the accused is eventually found not guilty, that does not mean that the accusation was spurious in the first place.

 

[Senor M]

You clearly know nothing about spurious allegations. As a man you're right in the box seat for it to happen to.

If it were a completely baseless allegation, then the "accused"'s lawyer would have called for the case to be dismissed months ago.

The accused has missed an entire season; you can't believe that if there wasn't some nuance to the evidence that he would just accept that, especially when he is wealthier and more socially connected than most people his age

 

[Foucault1989]

Charges dropped?

 

[darrenmorgan]

Charges dropped?

sauce?

 

[ShaunWDT]

this just isnt true and is a pretty poor post. reads like mgtow crap.

if there was nothing to whatever the accused had done it would not have gotten as far as it has.

even if the accused is eventually found not guilty, that does not mean that the accusation was spurious in the first place.

Whole point of a committal hearing is to prove the legitimacy of charges so this isn't accurate at all, people just need to stop immediately thinking people are guilty as soon as accused that's about it.

 

[Perrip]

Charges dropped?

Seems like they will be.

 

[Pistol Night]

Seems like they will be.

Always a great situation. Either the "victim" has been pressured into it or a young bloke thats totally innocent now lives with this stigma forever. No winners really

 

[STPer18]

Leagle eagles, does that mean the evidence wasn't enough to even get to court proper or what?

 

[rei154]

Leagle eagles, does that mean the evidence wasn't enough to even get to court proper or what?

Could do, could also mean that the accuser was pressured/struggled out of proceedings for what ever reason.
Sadly we will never know for sure.

 

[Daka]

Swept under the carpet as usual.

 

[Perrip]

Could do, could also mean that the accuser was pressured/struggled out of proceedings for what ever reason.
Sadly we will never know for sure.

Probably get more info about it when it's in court next about why the prosecution is discontinuing the case. Sounds like the police had issues with her statements.
Geelong Advertiser - Rebekah Cavanagh

Sen-Constable Ronaldson said she had concerns about the inconsistencies in the complainant’s statement.

 

[fpm84]

Swept under the carpet as usual.

Maybe, or maybe…..

‘Two witnesses who testified said they were told in the weeks after the night out that the woman had said she lied about the alleged attack.

They heard the men paid the woman for sexual services, but after she demanded more money, which the men refused, she decided to report the interaction as rape, the court was told.

“[I concluded that] if she consented and requested payment for services, she provided consent; therefore it is not right … if she then reported it as rape – that would be lying to the police,” one of the witnesses told the court.‘