Selwood: Out (in more than one way)
- Thread starter RedLegs#5
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Re: Selwood gets off!
Well he hasn't learnt his lesson has he? All the more reason to be given some time off.
Well he hasn't learnt his lesson has he? All the more reason to be given some time off.
Re: Selwood gets off!
May well have finished Raines' career.
Only just got back in the team by reinventing himself as a tagger.
The role will be taken by someone else.
Raines' future dependes on their success or failure.
May well have finished Raines' career.
Only just got back in the team by reinventing himself as a tagger.
The role will be taken by someone else.
Raines' future dependes on their success or failure.
- Nov 30, 2000
- 10,503
- 7,244
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- LUFC/MSRLC/MVFC
Re: Selwood gets off!
Read my later reply, sunshine.
Are you Geelong supporters genuinely stupid or really just that biased? I'm going with both.
Read my later reply, sunshine.
Re: Selwood gets off!
shouldn't have got off, i reckon.
captains shouldn't act like that anyway.
shouldn't have got off, i reckon.
captains shouldn't act like that anyway.
Re: Selwood gets off!
Yeh. Nah.
Are you Geelong supporters genuinely stupid or really just that biased? I'm going with both
Yeh. Nah.
Mercurial89
Brownlow Medallist
Re: Selwood gets off!
Mate he smacked someone in the head so he got smacked back and went down like a sack of spuds and gets cleared, Raines should have got off as well , its pathetic.
WTF does this mean?
I thought you were all crying about the head high contact? At least be consistent with your sooking. Are you implying he dives?
The force was too minimal to warrant a report ala Ivan Maric a couple of weeks ago.. I didn't see you all jumping up and down when he got off....
Mate he smacked someone in the head so he got smacked back and went down like a sack of spuds and gets cleared, Raines should have got off as well , its pathetic.
RedLegs#5
Cancelled
- May 30, 2005
- 5,676
- 3,350
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Socceroos,Wallabies, Glenn McGrath.
- Thread starter
- #136
Re: Selwood gets off!
Yes, you come under more stupid than biased.
Not shaping up to be such a respectable captain is young glass jaw Selwood.
A sensible decision and a good day for football.
Yes, you come under more stupid than biased.
Not shaping up to be such a respectable captain is young glass jaw Selwood.
Re: Selwood gets off!
Sure, since you think hitting a bloke off the ball is good for football apparently.
A sensible decision and a good day for football.
Sure, since you think hitting a bloke off the ball is good for football apparently.
Seems its ok in the AFL now to instigate on field violence as long as your opponent retaliates and knocks your block off. Disgraceful message sent by the MRP.
winty
Moderator
- Moderator
- #139
Re: Selwood gets off!
Have to love people who are blaming Selwood for the mistakes of others. It's not like Selwood blows the whistle everytime he gets a free kick, nor is he part of the Match Review Panel.
Go off at the people who came to the decision you didn't like. Don't focus all your hatred at the player who had nothing to do with the decision making.
Have to love people who are blaming Selwood for the mistakes of others. It's not like Selwood blows the whistle everytime he gets a free kick, nor is he part of the Match Review Panel.
Go off at the people who came to the decision you didn't like. Don't focus all your hatred at the player who had nothing to do with the decision making.
Magma
TheBrownDog
Re: Selwood gets off!
precedent has been set.
seems like the whole any purposeful head high contact will be suspendable macho bullshit line is thrown out the window, depends how hard it is now. alrighty mrp, cant wait for that all to change again in 2-3 weeks.
precedent has been set.
seems like the whole any purposeful head high contact will be suspendable macho bullshit line is thrown out the window, depends how hard it is now. alrighty mrp, cant wait for that all to change again in 2-3 weeks.
Re: Selwood gets off!
A bloke wacks a guy and is cleared, a bloke acts in what could be argued as self defense and is given a 3 week holiday based on the bloke he hit going down like a sack of s**t. The MRP are out doing themselves this year!
A bloke wacks a guy and is cleared, a bloke acts in what could be argued as self defense and is given a 3 week holiday based on the bloke he hit going down like a sack of s**t. The MRP are out doing themselves this year!
superfreak
Premiership Player
Re: Selwood gets off!
MEDIA RELEASE FROM THE AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE
The AFL wishes to advise the Match Review Panel has reviewed the weekend’s matches, with two matters still the subject of investigations that should be completed by late today, Monday April 30. The following charges were laid:
Charges Laid:
Patrick Veszpremi, Western Bulldogs, has been charged with a Level Two misconduct offence for making contact with his head to Tomas Bugg, GWS Giants, during the fourth quarter of the Round Five match between the Western Bulldogs and the GWS Giants, played at Manuka Oval on Saturday April 28, 2012.
In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the GWS Giants, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.
Kyal Horsley, Gold Coast Suns, has been charged with a first offence for making negligent contact with an umpire (Heath Ryan), during the first quarter of the Round Five match between the Gold Coast Suns and North Melbourne, played at Etihad Stadium on Saturday April 28, 2012.
In summary, he can accept an $900 sanction with an early plea.
A first offence for making negligent contact with an umpire is a $1200 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $900 sanction.
Leigh Montagna, St Kilda, has been charged with a Level Three striking offence against James Magner, Melbourne, during the first quarter of the Round Five match between St Kilda and Melbourne, played at the MCG on Saturday April 28, 2012.
In summary, due to his previous poor record, his two-match sanction must remain at two matches, even with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of one match suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 10 per cent to 247.50 points. He also has 64.06 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 311.56 points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 233.67 points and a two-match sanction.
Andrew Raines, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a Level Four striking offence against Joel Selwood, Geelong Cats, during the fourth quarter of the Round Five match between the Brisbane Lions and the Geelong Cats, played at the Gabba on Saturday April 28, 2012.
In summary, due to his previous good record, his three-match sanction can be reduced to one match with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Geelong Cats Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of seven activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Four offence, drawing 325 demerit points and three-match sanction. He has an existing good record, reducing the penalty by 25 per cent to 243.75 points and a two-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 182.81 points and a one-match sanction.
Will Schofield, West Coast, has been charged with a Level Three striking offence against Jack Riewoldt, Richmond, during the second quarter of the Round Five match between West Coast and Richmond, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday April 29, 2012.
In summary, due to his previous poor record, his two-match sanction must remain at two matches, even with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Richmond Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), medium impact (two points) and body contact (one point). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has 93.75 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 318.75 points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 239.06 points and a two-match sanction.
Taylor Walker, Adelaide Crows, has been charged with a Level One bumping or making forceful contact from front-on offence against Jacob Surjan, Port Adelaide, during the third quarter of the Round Five match between the Adelaide Crows and Port Adelaide, played at AAMI Stadium on Sunday April 29, 2012.
In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Port Adelaide Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.
Other incidents Assessed:
Contact between Carlton’s Jarrad Waite and Fremantle’s Adam McPhee from the second quarter of Friday’s match was assessed. It was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.
Contact between the Western Bulldogs’ Liam Picken and the GWS Giants’ Israel Folau from the first quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. Folau has received the ball and seeking to kick when he is tackled by player Picken around the waist. Folau disposes of the ball and does not brace for contact with the ground as part of the tackle. It was the view of the panel that Picken’s tackle was not unreasonable in the circumstances and the tackle did not have a slinging motion or a double action to drive his opponent into the ground. No further action was taken.
Contact between the Gold Coast Suns’ Karmichael Hunt and North Melbourne’s Andrew Swallow from the third quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The ball is bounced in the middle of the ground and player Swallow is bending to collect the ball as he is tackled by the Suns’ Josh Caddy. Player Hunt is coming to the contest from the side and tries to avoid making contact with the pair of players as they go to the ground. It was the view of the panel that the contact was caused by circumstances outside the control of player Hunt. No further action was taken.
Contact between the Brisbane Lions’ Andrew Raines and the Geelong Cats’ Joel Selwood from the first quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. the ball is kicked from the Brisbane defence and is loose. Selwood bends over to pick up the ball while Raines is also coming in to contest possession. Raines has his arm out in front of him in a bid to win the ball, but makes high contact. It was the view of the panel that Raines was attempting to win possession and did not have a realistic alternative way to contest the ball. No further action was taken.
Contact between the Geelong Cats’ Joel Selwood and the Brisbane Lions’ Andrew Raines from the fourth quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The two players are ahead of the ball and running upfield. Selwood makes high contact to Raines with his left hand. After receiving a medical report from the Brisbane Lions Football Club, it was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a report. No further action was taken.
Contact between West Coast’s Beau Waters and Richmond’s Daniel Jackson from the first quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. Richmond’s Shane Tuck has the ball on the wing and player Jackson is forward of the ball, calling for possession. Waters steps into Jackson’s path and braces for contact to block him. It was the view of the panel there was no forceful high contact and that Waters’ action was not unreasonable in the circumstances. The panel said the force used was not excessive in the circumstances and Jackson could reasonably expect contact to be made, having regard to his involvement in play. No further action was taken.
Contact between Richmond’s Shane Tuck and West Coast’s Ashton Hams from the fourth quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. After a marking contest, the ball comes to ground. Hams is moving towards the ball while Tuck is coming from the opposite direction. Tuck turns side-on to contest the ball and has his eyes on the ball. High contact is made to player Hams and a free kick is paid. It was the view of the panel that Tuck was attempting to win possession and had no realistic alternative way to contest the ball. No further action was taken.
MEDIA RELEASE FROM THE AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE
The AFL wishes to advise the Match Review Panel has reviewed the weekend’s matches, with two matters still the subject of investigations that should be completed by late today, Monday April 30. The following charges were laid:
Charges Laid:
Patrick Veszpremi, Western Bulldogs, has been charged with a Level Two misconduct offence for making contact with his head to Tomas Bugg, GWS Giants, during the fourth quarter of the Round Five match between the Western Bulldogs and the GWS Giants, played at Manuka Oval on Saturday April 28, 2012.
In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the GWS Giants, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.
Kyal Horsley, Gold Coast Suns, has been charged with a first offence for making negligent contact with an umpire (Heath Ryan), during the first quarter of the Round Five match between the Gold Coast Suns and North Melbourne, played at Etihad Stadium on Saturday April 28, 2012.
In summary, he can accept an $900 sanction with an early plea.
A first offence for making negligent contact with an umpire is a $1200 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $900 sanction.
Leigh Montagna, St Kilda, has been charged with a Level Three striking offence against James Magner, Melbourne, during the first quarter of the Round Five match between St Kilda and Melbourne, played at the MCG on Saturday April 28, 2012.
In summary, due to his previous poor record, his two-match sanction must remain at two matches, even with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of one match suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 10 per cent to 247.50 points. He also has 64.06 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 311.56 points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 233.67 points and a two-match sanction.
Andrew Raines, Brisbane Lions, has been charged with a Level Four striking offence against Joel Selwood, Geelong Cats, during the fourth quarter of the Round Five match between the Brisbane Lions and the Geelong Cats, played at the Gabba on Saturday April 28, 2012.
In summary, due to his previous good record, his three-match sanction can be reduced to one match with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Geelong Cats Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of seven activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Four offence, drawing 325 demerit points and three-match sanction. He has an existing good record, reducing the penalty by 25 per cent to 243.75 points and a two-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 182.81 points and a one-match sanction.
Will Schofield, West Coast, has been charged with a Level Three striking offence against Jack Riewoldt, Richmond, during the second quarter of the Round Five match between West Coast and Richmond, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday April 29, 2012.
In summary, due to his previous poor record, his two-match sanction must remain at two matches, even with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Richmond Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), medium impact (two points) and body contact (one point). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has 93.75 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 318.75 points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 239.06 points and a two-match sanction.
Taylor Walker, Adelaide Crows, has been charged with a Level One bumping or making forceful contact from front-on offence against Jacob Surjan, Port Adelaide, during the third quarter of the Round Five match between the Adelaide Crows and Port Adelaide, played at AAMI Stadium on Sunday April 29, 2012.
In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Port Adelaide Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.
Other incidents Assessed:
Contact between Carlton’s Jarrad Waite and Fremantle’s Adam McPhee from the second quarter of Friday’s match was assessed. It was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.
Contact between the Western Bulldogs’ Liam Picken and the GWS Giants’ Israel Folau from the first quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. Folau has received the ball and seeking to kick when he is tackled by player Picken around the waist. Folau disposes of the ball and does not brace for contact with the ground as part of the tackle. It was the view of the panel that Picken’s tackle was not unreasonable in the circumstances and the tackle did not have a slinging motion or a double action to drive his opponent into the ground. No further action was taken.
Contact between the Gold Coast Suns’ Karmichael Hunt and North Melbourne’s Andrew Swallow from the third quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The ball is bounced in the middle of the ground and player Swallow is bending to collect the ball as he is tackled by the Suns’ Josh Caddy. Player Hunt is coming to the contest from the side and tries to avoid making contact with the pair of players as they go to the ground. It was the view of the panel that the contact was caused by circumstances outside the control of player Hunt. No further action was taken.
Contact between the Brisbane Lions’ Andrew Raines and the Geelong Cats’ Joel Selwood from the first quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. the ball is kicked from the Brisbane defence and is loose. Selwood bends over to pick up the ball while Raines is also coming in to contest possession. Raines has his arm out in front of him in a bid to win the ball, but makes high contact. It was the view of the panel that Raines was attempting to win possession and did not have a realistic alternative way to contest the ball. No further action was taken.
Contact between the Geelong Cats’ Joel Selwood and the Brisbane Lions’ Andrew Raines from the fourth quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The two players are ahead of the ball and running upfield. Selwood makes high contact to Raines with his left hand. After receiving a medical report from the Brisbane Lions Football Club, it was the view of the panel the force used was below that required to constitute a report. No further action was taken.
Contact between West Coast’s Beau Waters and Richmond’s Daniel Jackson from the first quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. Richmond’s Shane Tuck has the ball on the wing and player Jackson is forward of the ball, calling for possession. Waters steps into Jackson’s path and braces for contact to block him. It was the view of the panel there was no forceful high contact and that Waters’ action was not unreasonable in the circumstances. The panel said the force used was not excessive in the circumstances and Jackson could reasonably expect contact to be made, having regard to his involvement in play. No further action was taken.
Contact between Richmond’s Shane Tuck and West Coast’s Ashton Hams from the fourth quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. After a marking contest, the ball comes to ground. Hams is moving towards the ball while Tuck is coming from the opposite direction. Tuck turns side-on to contest the ball and has his eyes on the ball. High contact is made to player Hams and a free kick is paid. It was the view of the panel that Tuck was attempting to win possession and had no realistic alternative way to contest the ball. No further action was taken.
muttweed
Cancelled
Re: Selwood gets off!
I love Sel to death, but that was just such a shitty decision.
And protected species my ass. One game he escapes suspension, and all of a sudden he's protected? Gtfo. Please.
I love Sel to death, but that was just such a shitty decision.
And protected species my ass. One game he escapes suspension, and all of a sudden he's protected? Gtfo. Please.
- Banned
- #144
Re: Selwood gets off!
so raines gets weeks because selwood goes to ground. good on Raines for not going to ground like selwood did to milk a free kick. Selwood going to ground as the norm along with throwing the arms out and the new ducking (dropping the knees)
Both should have got the same, either 3 or nothing. Would have been funny to see selwood get 3 plus his loading.
Ill be interested to see what gerard weatley has to say about this tonight on afl360, his geelong bias will ring true i bet, as always
so raines gets weeks because selwood goes to ground. good on Raines for not going to ground like selwood did to milk a free kick. Selwood going to ground as the norm along with throwing the arms out and the new ducking (dropping the knees)
Both should have got the same, either 3 or nothing. Would have been funny to see selwood get 3 plus his loading.
Ill be interested to see what gerard weatley has to say about this tonight on afl360, his geelong bias will ring true i bet, as always
MightyHawks
Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
Footy Club Survivor 3: Hawks Back to Back
10k Posts
Hawthorn Hawks - Conor Nash Player Sponsor 2017
Hawthorn Hawks - Kaiden Brand Player Sponsor 2017
Hawthorn Hawks - James Cousins Player Sponsor 2017
Hawthorn Hawks - Jermaine Miller-Lewis, Alex Woodward, Kaiden Brand Player Sponsor 2016
Hawthorn Hawks - Lowden, Anderson, Woodward Player Sponsor 2013
Re: Selwood gets off!
And how did Jordan Lewis get two weeks for the Monfries incident last year?
And how did Jordan Lewis get two weeks for the Monfries incident last year?
RedLegs#5
Cancelled
- May 30, 2005
- 5,676
- 3,350
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Socceroos,Wallabies, Glenn McGrath.
- Thread starter
- #146
Re: Selwood gets off!
I think it's perfectly reasonable for people to be angry at a player who constantly snipes behind the play.
You're a moderator, where's your objectivity?
I think it's perfectly reasonable for people to be angry at a player who constantly snipes behind the play.
You're a moderator, where's your objectivity?
Re: Selwood gets off!
Terrible inconsistent decision.
However people shouldnt be hating on Jelwood here, not his fault the MRP loves him and have him in their DTs, I bet he's just as surprised as us that he got off!
Terrible inconsistent decision.
However people shouldnt be hating on Jelwood here, not his fault the MRP loves him and have him in their DTs, I bet he's just as surprised as us that he got off!
Re: Selwood gets off!
Selwood was the instigator and he gets off its a pathetic outcome. This is another double standard from the muppet review panel...
they should both have been given 2 weeks anything else is bullsh!t
Selwood was the instigator and he gets off its a pathetic outcome. This is another double standard from the muppet review panel...
they should both have been given 2 weeks anything else is bullsh!t
lionaround
Club Legend
Re: Selwood gets off!
A precedent has now been set that you can punch anyone in the face, as long as you don't punch Joel Selwood.
I would expect the Lions and Raines to contest this charge, what an absolute joke. If anything Selwood should of received 2 weeks.
At least the MRP had some sense on this issue:
A precedent has now been set that you can punch anyone in the face, as long as you don't punch Joel Selwood.
I would expect the Lions and Raines to contest this charge, what an absolute joke. If anything Selwood should of received 2 weeks.
At least the MRP had some sense on this issue:
- Nov 30, 2000
- 10,503
- 7,244
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- LUFC/MSRLC/MVFC
Re: Selwood gets off!
Yep, I'm sure he cares what everyone outside of the Geelong Football Club thinks.
Yep, I'm sure he cares what everyone outside of the Geelong Football Club thinks.
Similar threads
