- Banned
- #8,626
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you have a source for the coming back for money line or were you just making s**t up. Surely you wouldn’t post innuendo.AFL Tonight started with this story. Just a shocking situation and I really feel for the family.
On the Cats board one poster has suggested that the mental health issues of his sister is the major reason he has been wanting to come back to Victoria. The Cats and the GC need to get something sorted out quickly though it all looks a bit late now.
And I have to apologise for some of my thoughts, being that he was just coming back for money purposes. Very incorrect it would seem in the light of this tragic development.
Good, not enough Sherrins for the ugly giraffe, orazioooo, Greenie, Dev and now Swinger.. They'll be eating each other by round 1.Rumours that Stringer to * good as done.
Did you have a source for the coming back for money line or were you just making s**t up. Surely you wouldn’t post innuendo.
Horace admitted he made a mistake and apologised. Only one poster on this board chose to have a crack at him. Make of that what you will.Did you have a source for the coming back for money line or were you just making s**t up. Surely you wouldn’t post innuendo.
Show me what you’re apologising for and my guess is it’s innuendo. But, you don’t like people posting anything unfounded so I’m guessing you didn’t post innuendo. But then I’m confused as to why you would be apologising.Show me where I posted innuendo.
A paper hat.Horace admitted he made a mistake and apologised. Only one poster on this board chose to have a crack at him. Make of that what you will.
Show me what you’re apologising for and my guess is it’s innuendo. But, you don’t like people posting anything unfounded so I’m guessing you didn’t post innuendo. But then I’m confused as to why you would be apologising.
Who are you apogisong too? If you feel guilty of personal thoughts about Ablett, apolgise to him. Your persoanl thoughts haven’t offended or hurt anyone on this forum. Sure admit you were wrong, but if you feel so guilty send Ablett a message on Twitter or do the old fashioned thing and write him a letter.Well golly gosh. What a twisted process you've been through. You didn't like what I said to you in the "Who is Cam Joyce" thread yesterday, so you've decided to have a crack at me in a totally unrelated thread.
Not that I need to explain anything to you but what I was apologising for were my own personal thoughts. I simply thought that the reason for him wanting to come back was because he was coming back for a better financial reward from Geelong. I never even mentioned those thoughts to anyone. I never posted those thoughts anywhere.
We all at times jump to conclusions, occasionally right mainly wrong. In my mind I misjudged him. I was wrong. I felt guilty about my thoughts so I owned up. That is all.
Who are you apogisong too? If you feel guilty of personal thoughts about Ablett, apolgise to him. Your persoanl thoughts haven’t offended or hurt anyone on this forum. Sure admit you were wrong, but if you feel so guilty send Ablett a message on Twitter or do the old fashioned thing and write him a letter.
You could put whoever that is on ignore.Weird post if ever I have read a weird post.
Even weirder your suggested approach. Oh well.
Think what you like but don't bother engaging me in this thread any further because I won't be reacting to your inanity in this thread anymore.
You could put whoever that is on ignore.
So Geelong get pick 19 for Motlop as compo which was way too high.
Cats then 'coincidentally' use pick 19 to get disgruntled Ablett back to Cats. (and a tiny swap of seconds)
So essentially Cats got Ablett for Motlop as direct swap.
AFL is an absolute farce.
surely thats DRs alter ego?Thanks H2H. Yes I may well do that. But if I'm not mistaken that poster is the poster who defends the umpires every time anyone complains. It is always worth reading him/her (pretty sure it is a him) defending the indefensible.