So why the hell are you still in here posting about it.
To help keep Geelong supporters feet on the ground after 5 wins against predicted bottom 8 teams.
A few of you getting a little. bit. carried. away.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why the hell are you still in here posting about it.
But a whole heap of Richmond players turned from finals incompetent to finals stars between the 2015 EF and the 2017 QF.
So I'm not sure this is some amazing metric: which players might stand up in a final one day.
A lot of our 25 and unders have multiple good finals performances in the bank anyway.
You'll only respond with Player Ratings nobody cares about. I'd rather discuss it with someone who watched the matches outside of the 3 Richmond ones.Like to name them?
Saints: made top 8, somehow predicted bottom 8?To help keep Geelong supporters feet on the ground after 5 wins against predicted bottom 8 teams.
A few of you getting a little. bit. carried. away.
I had a flick through the ladder prediction thread and Bulldogs/Adelaide/St Kilda were almost universally placed ahead of Geelong. A few even put Hawthorn ahead.Saints: made top 8, somehow predicted bottom 8?
Crom: Predicted by pretty much everyone to be top 8 and some even had top 4
Hawks: Bottom 4
Dogs: Anywhere from 6th-10th
Norf: Bottom 4
Stop the cap, people like you are definition of Tall Poppy Syndrome
Saints: made top 8, somehow predicted bottom 8?
Crom: Predicted by pretty much everyone to be top 8 and some even had top 4
Hawks: Bottom 4
Dogs: Anywhere from 6th-10th
Norf: Bottom 4
Stop the cap, people like you are definition of Tall Poppy Syndrome
Fellow finals contender Geelong beating them may have had something to do with that.I didn't make up the CURRENT BETTING ODDS.
I didn't make up the CURRENT BETTING ODDS.
Fellow finals contender Geelong beating them may have had something to do with that.
I know there was barely anything between St Kilda, Adelaide, Bulldogs and Geelong for premiership odds before the season.
So we have beaten 3 of our direct competitors. Once home, once neutral and once away. The ones you need to beat to make finals.
Games missed have been:
C.Guthrie: 5
Rohan: 5
Dangerfield: 3
Bowes: 2
Hawkins: 1
Duncan: 1
Stanley: 1
Kolodjashnij: 1
Bruhn: 1
Tuohy: 1
Atkins: 1
By no means a crisis (most sides will miss their top 2 mids though), but it shows we are utilising the top 28 or so players with most picking up a niggle or being managed so far. And a lot of those players are the under 30s you say are not elite so are as good as useless.
By no means a crisis? You are having a laugh. As we can see from the current table below, 4 of the 5 teams Geelong have played have had more absences from their best 22 than Geelong. Of your opponents, North and Hawthorn will be unarguably in everyone's predicted bottom 4 right now.
But if you think Crows at $6.00 Bulldogs $2.50 and Saints $2.50 to make the top 8 are value then tuck in, let us know how you get on. That is their current odds. It is not like I am quoting from some outrageous source. I can see you guys actually expect the rest of the world to be as over the top excited by your team's performances as you are. All I have said is hang on, let's see how they get on when they play the form teams, the teams favoured to make the top 4 and top 8, or decent teams near full strength. Because that is what you have to ultimately beat to get anywhere in any season. The teams you have beaten so far are 5w 15l outside their matches against Geelong, and have few meritorious performances between them, thus their current betting odds.
View attachment 1960930
Once again you have missed the point spectacularly.By no means a crisis? You are having a laugh. As we can see from the current table below, 4 of the 5 teams Geelong have played have had more absences from their best 22 than Geelong. Of your opponents, North and Hawthorn will be unarguably in everyone's predicted bottom 4 right now.
But if you think Crows at $6.00 Bulldogs $2.50 and Saints $2.50 to make the top 8 are value then tuck in, let us know how you get on. That is their current odds. It is not like I am quoting from some outrageous source. I can see you guys actually expect the rest of the world to be as over the top excited by your team's performances as you are. All I have said is hang on, let's see how they get on when they play the form teams, the teams favoured to make the top 4 and top 8, or decent teams near full strength. Because that is what you have to ultimately beat to get anywhere in any season. The teams you have beaten so far are 5w 15l outside their matches against Geelong, and have few meritorious performances between them, thus their current betting odds.
View attachment 1960930
Once again you have missed the point spectacularly.
I said we are already rotating the cast and the backups/deep squad are performing pretty well. Then the ones who have played every week have stood up. The side is adapting to each weeks challenges and the reshuffled squads are working.
Round 1: C.Guthrie, Rohan, Bowes
Round 2: C.Guthrie, Duncan, Atkins, Bruhn, Rohan, Bowes
Round 3: C.Guthrie, Dangerfield, Stanley, Rohan
Round 4: C.Guthrie, Dangerfield, Rohan, Tuohy
Round 5: C.Guthrie, Dangerfield, Hawkins, Kolodjashnij, Rohan
That's still plenty of games missed by veterans while the younger brigade have been doing well in coaches votes and so on.
2-4 starting mids missing each week. When Richmond are missing Taranto, Prestia and Hopper from midfield we hear a lot about it.
I'm satisfied that we have plenty of good contributors under 31 years of age this season, yes. When we've had senior players missing, we have leaned on all players in their 20s to get the job done. Cameron and Stewart continue to star but the rest of our veterans have just been good, solid contributors like the under 30s you are critiquing.So you are already satisfied you have the elite players under 31 years of age who are going to win you finals against the best teams in the competition over the current and future seasons because Geelong has comfortable wins v Adelaide and Hawthorn, an easy win v North, and narrow wins v St Kilda and Bulldogs?
Because that is my point entirely.
So you are already satisfied you have the elite players under 31 years of age who are going to win you finals against the best teams in the competition over the current and future seasons because Geelong has comfortable wins v Adelaide and Hawthorn, an easy win v North, and narrow wins v St Kilda and Bulldogs?
Because that is my point entirely.
Geelong - too young, too fast, too inexperienced, too good?At one stage we had too many 30+-year-olds and now we don't have enough 26-29-year-olds and too much youth? Keep moving the goalposts.
Where does this even come from, though?So you are already satisfied you have the elite players under 31 years of age who are going to win you finals against the best teams in the competition over the current and future seasons because Geelong has comfortable wins v Adelaide and Hawthorn, an easy win v North, and narrow wins v St Kilda and Bulldogs?
Because that is my point entirely.
The clown isn't meant to comment on how pleased he is that his performance amused the masses.Lol, Cats nuffies have gone full plot loss. Great to see.
Lol, Cats nuffies have gone full plot loss. Great to see.
Even after falling off The Cliff™ expectations of Geelong are still extremely high it seems.Where does this even come from, though?
I thought the narrative was 'Geelong will be treading water AT BEST in 2024 because they have no good youth coming through'. That was the mantra from opposition fans all off-season.
Now it's done a complete 180 and it's somehow become "If they don't win finals against the best in the comp, it's a failure"?
The Cliff™ was falling off the sidewalk and onto the curb for us. It's wasn't particularly steep.Even after falling off The Cliff™ expectations of Geelong are still extremely high it seems.